After Whaling in the Antarctic: Amending Article viii to Fix a Broken Treaty Regime

in The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Since the global decline in commercial whaling, the International Whaling Commission (iwc) has been at the centre of a long-standing debate between pro-whaling industry States and whale preservation States that threatens the collapse of the International Convention for the Regulation of Whaling (icrw) as a treaty regime. This article describes the ongoing treaty regime disagreement that led to the International Court of Justice (icj) Whaling in the Antarctic case and suggests that the icj’s decision highlights further weaknesses in the existing icrw treaty regime. The fissures in the treaty regime have become even more apparent with the iwc Scientific Committee’s request for more data from the Japanese government on the Proposed Research Plan for New Scientific Whale Research Program in the Antarctic Ocean (newrep-a) and Japan’s diplomatic threat to unilaterally resume whaling. The article concludes with a suggestion that States amend Article viii in order to strengthen the existing icrw framework.

Sections
References
  • 33

    J McCurry‘Australia Threatens Legal Action over Japanese Whaling’The Guardian19 February 2010 at 27.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 258 65 2
Full Text Views 206 206 2
PDF Downloads 28 28 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0