Mou Zongsan and Martin Heidegger: Reopening a Debate on Ontology and Ethics

in Frontiers of Philosophy in China
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In this paper I investigate differences and similarities in the definitions of human being and human essence as proposed by two of the most influential thinkers of 20th-century world philosophy, namely Mou Zongsan and Martin Heidegger. I first examine a number of interpretations put forth by scholars that assess the philosophical compatibility of the thought of the two philosophers. Each of these assessments tend to agree that they are incompatible with each other based on what they perceive as an absolute distance between Mou’s and Heidegger’s ways of thinking. Although these studies are pioneering and show an in-depth understanding of Mou’s thought, none demonstrate a correct understanding of Heidegger’s philosophy. Therefore, I will attempt to demonstrate that, despite their differences, the ontological and ethical theses of Mou and Heidegger have several striking points of contact. I will also put forth the claim that Heidegger’s post-turn philosophy is more compatible with Mou’s philosophy than Kant’s system.

Mou Zongsan and Martin Heidegger: Reopening a Debate on Ontology and Ethics

in Frontiers of Philosophy in China

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 120 120 5
Full Text Views 17 17 5
PDF Downloads 4 4 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0