Stabilization at the Expense of Peacebuilding in UN Peacekeeping Operations

More Than Just a Phase?

In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
David Curran Coventry University Centre for Trust, Peace, and Social Relations UK Coventry

Search for other papers by David Curran in
Current site
Google Scholar
Charles T. Hunt RMIT University Social and Global Studies Centre Australia Melbourne

Search for other papers by Charles T. Hunt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):



The “uploading” of stabilization to UN peacekeeping presents conceptual, political, and practical challenges to the UN’s role in global governance and international conflict management. While scholarly research on stabilization has generally focused on militarization, its relationship to peacebuilding in the context of UN peacekeeping is underexplored. This article examines that relationship. A survey of UN policy frameworks highlights the simultaneous emergence of stabilization and clear expressions of peacebuilding. The article then draws on fieldwork in Mali and the Democratic Republic of Congo to illustrate how stabilization is displacing peacebuilding in the practices of UN peacekeeping. The article argues that the politics of stabilization impede local forms of peacebuilding, at odds with the “Sustaining Peace” agenda, and risks jeopardizing the lauded conflict resolution potential of UN peacekeeping.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3672 766 63
Full Text Views 636 163 2
PDF Views & Downloads 1135 327 6