Save

Fixing Meanings in Global Governance?

“Respect” and “Protect” in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Author:
David Jason Karp University of Sussex Department of International Relations United Kingdom Brighton

Search for other papers by David Jason Karp in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This article uses snapshots, rather than the ongoing flows of diffusion/contestation typically emphasized by constructivists, to explore the exercise of power through normative change. Its case is a high-profile Human Rights Council initiative: the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGP s). These UNGP s have successfully presented meanings as fixed while actually stretching those meanings’ boundaries. They reconceptualize what it means to “respect” and “protect” human rights. This is surprising given that the principles were framed as a conservative exercise at clarification, and under-noticed due to the legal rather than conceptual focus of the existing critical literature. To respect human rights, according to the UNGP s, agents need to take costly positive action. Furthermore, protect obligations come before respect. These are significant innovations. On the other hand, two missed opportunities of the UNGP s are their thin harm-based foundation for respect obligations, and their state centrism about who has duties to protect.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2337 856 42
Full Text Views 204 35 4
PDF Views & Downloads 485 89 10