This article discusses how the institutionalization of international mediation practices and its growing relevance since the end of the Cold War coincided with the formation of an epistemic community that shares common practices for a third party. This community focuses on core concepts that structure mediation practices such as efficiency, rationality, and the management of time and information. The article analyzes the consolidation of this community through the circulation of knowledge among scholars and practitioners. In particular, it highlights the place of the concept of ripeness, developed by Ira William Zartman, in stabilizing a division between a moment of conflict and a moment of nonconflict; and it discusses the place of the UN system in its dissemination among mediation practitioners. The article argues that the project-oriented understanding of mediation practices that arises from these shared conceptions contributes to an insulation of these practices from broader views of conflict within international politics.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adler, Emanuel, and Steven Bernstein. “Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance.” In Power in Global Governance, eds. Michael Barnett and Raymond Duval (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 294–318.
Adler, Emanuel, and Vincent Pouliot. “International Practices.” International Theory 3 (1) (2011), 1–36.
Amer, Ramses. “The Resolution of the Cambodian Conflict: Assessing the Explanatory Value of Zartman’s Ripeness Theory.” Journal of Peace Research 44 (6) (2007), 729–742.
Ashley, Richard K. “The Geopolitics of Geopolitical Space: Toward a Critical Social Theory of International Politics.” Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 12 (4) (1987), 403–434.
Bercovitch, Jacob. “Mediators and Mediation Strategies in International Relations.” Negotiation Journal 8 (2) (1992), 99–112.
Bercovitch, Jacob. “Mediation Success or Failure: A Search for the Elusive Criteria.” Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution 7 (2005), 289–301.
Cetina, Karin Knorr, Theodore R. Schatzki, and Eike Von Savigny, eds. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (London: Routledge, 2005).
Connolly, Eileen, and John Doyle. “Ripe Moments for Exiting Political Violence: An Analysis of the Northern Ireland Case.” Irish Studies in International Affairs 26 (2015), 147–162.
Crocker, Chester A. High Noon in Southern Africa: Making Peace in a Rough Neighborhood, 1st ed. (New York: Norton, 1992).
Cross, Mai’a K. Davis. “Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later.” Review of International Studies 39 (1) (2013), 137–160.
Djelic, Marie-Laure, and Sigrid Quack, eds. Transnational Communities: Shaping Global Economic Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Edmead, Frank. Analysis and Prediction in International Mediation (New York: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 1971).
Faget, Jacques. “Les Métamorphoses Du Travail De Paix: État Des Travaux Sur La Médiation Dans Les Conflits Politiques Violents.” Revue Française de Science Politique 58 (2) (2008), 309–333.
German Federal Foreign Office and Initiative Mediation Support Deutschland. “Basics of Mediation: Concepts and Definitions.” Fact Sheet Series: Peace Mediation and Mediation Support (Berlin: Initiative Mediation Support Deutschland, 2017). https://peacemaker.un.org/resources/mediation-library/section?term_node_tid_depth=Mediation%20Process%20and%20Strategy#.
Goertz, Gary, Alexandru Balas, and Paul Francis Diehl. The Puzzle of Peace: The Evolution of Peace in the International System (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016).
Haas, Peter. “Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46 (1) (1992), 1–35.
Haass, Richard. Conflicts Unending: The United States and Regional Disputes (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990).
Hampson, Fen Osler, and I. William Zartman. Global Power of Talk: Negotiating America’s Interests (London: Routledge, 2015).
Hinnebusch, Raymond, and I. William Zartman. “UN Mediation in the Syrian Crisis: From Kofi Annan to Lakhdar Brahimi” (Washington, DC: International Peace Institute, 2016).
Jabri, Vivienne. War and the Transformation of Global Politics (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007).
Kleiboer, Marieke. “Review: Ripeness of Conflict: A Fruitful Notion?” Journal of Peace Research 31 (1) (1994), 109–116.
Lax, David A., and James K. Sebenius. “Thinking Coalitionally: Party Arithmetic, Process Opportunism, and Strategic Sequencing.” In Negotiation Analysis, ed. H. Peyton Young (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991), 153–173.
Lloyd Jones, Deiniol. “Mediation, Conflict Resolution and Critical Theory.” Review of International Studies 26 (4) (2000), 647–662.
Mancini, Francesco, and José Vericat. Lost in Transition: Lost in Transition: UN Mediation in Libya, Syria, and Yemen (Washington, DC: International Peace Institute, 2016). https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/1611_Lost-in-Transition.pdf.
Mason, Simon Jonas Augusto, and Damiano Angelo Sguaitamatti. “Mapping Mediators: A Comparison of Third Parties and Implications for Switzerland.” ETH Zurich Research Collection (2011).
Merton, Robert K. “The Sociology of Knowledge.” Isis 27 (3) (1937), 493–503.
Mitchell, Christopher R. “Conflict Resolution and Civil War: Reflections on the Sudanese Settlement of 1972.” Working Paper 3 (Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, 1989).
Mitchell, Christopher. “The Right Moment: Notes on Four Models of ‘Ripeness.’ ” Paradigms 9 (2) (1995), 38–52.
Mitchell, Christopher R., and Keith Webb, eds. New Approaches to International Mediation (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988).
Neocleous, Mark. Critique of Security (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007).
Peck, Connie, ed. Manual for UN Mediators: Advice from UN Representatives and Envoys (Geneva: United Nations Institute for Training and Research, 2010). https://unitar.org/pmcp/sites/unitar.org.pmcp/files/uploads/manualunmediators_un2010.pdf
Pouliot, Vincent. “Practice Tracing.” In Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool, eds. Andrew Bennett and Jeffrey T. Checkel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 237–259.
Pruitt, Dean G. “Ripeness Theory and the Oslo Talks.” International Negotiation 2 (2) (1997), 237–250.
Pruitt, Dean G. “Whither Ripeness Theory.” Working Paper No. 25 (Fairfax, VA: George Mason University, Institute for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, 2005). http://mars.gmu.edu/handle/1920/10648.
Sending, Ole Jacob, Vincent Pouliot, and Iver B. Neumann, “Introduction.” In Diplomacy and the Making of Work Policy, eds. Christian Reus-Smit and Nicholas J. Wheeler (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2015).
Stedman, Stephen John. Peacemaking in Civil War: International Mediation in Zimbabwe, 1974–1980 (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1991).
Teger, Allan I. Too Much Invested to Quit (New York: Pergamon Press, 1980).
UN. Charter of the United Nations (24 October 1945).
UN. United Nations Guidance for Effective Mediation (New York: UN, 2012). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/GuidanceEffectiveMediation_UNDPA2012%28english%29_0.pdf.
UN Department of Political Affairs. Mediation Start-up Guidelines (New York: UN, 2011). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/MediationStartupGuidalines_UNDPA2011.pdf.
UN Department of Political Affairs. Guidance for Mediators: Addressing Conflict-Related Sexual Violence in Ceasefire and Peace Agreements (New York: UN, 2012). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/GuidanceAdressingConflictRelatedSexualViolence_UNDPA%28english%29_0.pdf.
UN Department of Political Affairs. Supporting Peace: 2015 Appeal (New York: UN, 2015). https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Supporting%20peace%202015%20Appeal.pdf.
UN Department of Political Affairs. Guidance on Gender and Inclusive Mediation Strategies (New York: UN, 2017). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/1.%20English%20-GIMS.pdf.
UN Department of Political Affairs and UN Environment Programme. Natural Resources and Conflict: A Guide for Mediation Practitioners (New York: UN, 2015). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/MediationStartupGuidalines_UNDPA2011.pdf.
UN General Assembly. Strengthening the Role of Mediation in the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Conflict Prevention and Resolution. Resolution A/65/283 (22 June 2011). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/GARes_StrengtheningTheRoleOfMediation_ARES65283%28english%29_1.pdf.
UN General Assembly. Strengthening the Role of Mediation in the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Conflict Prevention and Resolution. Resolution A/65/283 (13 September 2012a). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/GA_ResolutionMediationA66291_English.pdf.
UN General Assembly. Strengthening the Role of Mediation in the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Conflict Prevention and Resolution: Report of the Secretary-General. Resolution A/66/811. (25 June 2012b). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/SGReport_StrenghteningtheRoleofMediation_A66811_0.pdf.
UN General Assembly. Strengthening the Role of Mediation in the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Conflict Prevention and Resolution. Resolution A/68/303 (31 July 2014). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/GA_ResolutionMediationARES68303_English_0.pdf.
UN General Assembly. Strengthening the Role of Mediation in the Peaceful Settlement of Disputes, Conflict Prevention and Resolution. Resolution A/70/304 (9 September 2016). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/N1628366.pdf.
UN Peacemaker. “Mediation Support Unit.” 2019a. https://peacemaker.un.org/mediation-support.
UN Peacemaker. “About UN Peacemaker.” 2019b. https://peacemaker.un.org/.
UN Secretary-General. “Note to Correspondents—Transcript of a Press Conference by Kofi Annan, Joint Special Envoy for Syria.” 2 August 2012. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/note-correspondents/2012-08-02/note-correspondents-transcript-press-conference-kofi-annan.
UN Secretary-General. “Secretary-General’s High-Level Advisory Board on Mediation.” News release, 13 September 2017. https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/personnel-appointments/2017-09-13/secretary-general%E2%80%99s-high-level-advisory-board-mediation.
UN Security Council. Report of the Secretary-General on Enhancing Mediation and Its Support Activities. UN Doc. S/2009/189 (8 April 2009). https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/SGReport_EnhancingMediation_S2009189%28english%29_0.pdf.
United States Institute of Peace. “Peacemaker’s Toolkit.” 26 February 2012. https://www.usip.org/publications/2012/02/peacemakers-toolkit.
Vukovic, Sinisa. “International Mediation as a Distinct Form of Conflict Management.” International Journal of Conflict Management 25 (1) (2014), 61–80.
Wallensteen, Peter, and Isak Svensson. “Talking Peace.” Journal of Peace Research 51 (2) (2014), 315–327.
Zartman, Ira William. Ripe for Resolution (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985).
Zartman, Ira William. “The Timing of Peace Initiatives: Hurting Stalemates and Ripe Moments.” In Contemporary Peacemaking: Conflict, Peace Processes and Post-War Reconstruction, eds. John Darby and Roger MacGinty (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 22–35.
Zartman, Ira William, and Maureen M. Berman. The Practical Negotiator (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982).
Zartman, Ira William, and Alvaro de Soto. Timing Mediation Initiatives (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace, 2010).
Zartman, Ira William, and Saadia Touval. “International Mediation in the Post-Cold War Era.” In Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict, eds. Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela R. Hall (Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1996), 445–461.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 529 | 160 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 58 | 19 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 135 | 31 | 3 |
This article discusses how the institutionalization of international mediation practices and its growing relevance since the end of the Cold War coincided with the formation of an epistemic community that shares common practices for a third party. This community focuses on core concepts that structure mediation practices such as efficiency, rationality, and the management of time and information. The article analyzes the consolidation of this community through the circulation of knowledge among scholars and practitioners. In particular, it highlights the place of the concept of ripeness, developed by Ira William Zartman, in stabilizing a division between a moment of conflict and a moment of nonconflict; and it discusses the place of the UN system in its dissemination among mediation practitioners. The article argues that the project-oriented understanding of mediation practices that arises from these shared conceptions contributes to an insulation of these practices from broader views of conflict within international politics.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 529 | 160 | 15 |
Full Text Views | 58 | 19 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 135 | 31 | 3 |