Save

Blessing or Curse?

The Effects of Earmarked Funding in UNICEF and UNDP

In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Authors:
Lisa Katharina Schmid
Search for other papers by Lisa Katharina Schmid in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Alexander Reitzenstein
Search for other papers by Alexander Reitzenstein in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nina Hall Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Bologna Italy

Search for other papers by Nina Hall in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-9029
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$34.95

Abstract

Earmarked funding to international organizations (IO s) has increased significantly over the past two decades. International relations scholars have examined the causes of this trend, but know less about its effects on UN entities. This article identifies different types of earmarked funding, varying from low to high discretion delegated to IO s. Secondly, it examines trends in the UN Development Programme and UN Children’s Fund and finds that both have significant proportions of earmarked funding with low discretion. Drawing on thirty interviews, the article notes four implications of tightly earmarked financing: 1) higher transaction costs for IO s; 2) less predictable funding; 3) overhead costs that are rarely covered; and 4) increasing competition for financing. Overall, the article highlights that earmarked financing exists on a spectrum from tight to minimal control by donor states, and this has important implications for multilateralism.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1574 508 24
Full Text Views 164 78 4
PDF Views & Downloads 387 178 9