Like other normative systems, the international nuclear export control norms are incomplete and at times contradictory. Thus, contestations to the international nuclear export control norms inevitably emerge, as they did in the wake of the 1974 Indian nuclear test and the 1991 discovery of Iraq’s nuclear weapons program. These two nuclear crises prompted intense debates regarding the adequacy of the existing norms. The outcome of the debates generated overwhelming agreement and action among nuclear suppliers that they required strengthening. Drawing on Wayne Sandholtz’s theory of normative change, which argues that events trigger disputes whose outcomes modify norms, this article illustrates how the nuclear export control norms have evolved in a cyclical fashion. The article aims to contribute to the constructivist literature on normative change and discusses policy implications.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Barnett, Michael, and Raymond Duvall. “Power in International Politics.” International Organization 59 (1) (2005), 39–75.
Bertsch, Gary, Richard Cupitt, and Steven Elliott-Gower. “Multilateral Export Control Organizations.” In International Cooperation on Nonproliferation Export Controls, eds. Gary Bertsch, Richard Cupitt, and Steven Elliott-Gower (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994).
Burr, William. “A Scheme of ‘Control’: The United States and the Origins of the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group, 1974–1976.” International History Review 36 (2) (2014), 252–276.
Carranza, Mario. “The Stability of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Norm: A Critique of Norm-Contestation Theory.” Nonproliferation Review 26 (1–2) (2019), 7–22.
Dar, Humaira. “Franco-Pakistan Nuclear Deal (1976): An Analytical Study.” Pakistan Vision 16 (1) (2015), 215–256.
“Discussion Paper on US Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy,” attached to “Analytical Staff Meeting,” addressed to Secretary of State Henry Kissinger from Director of the State Department Policy Planning Staff Winston Lord, 11 July 1974, RG 59, Executive Secretariat Records, Memorandums of the Executive Secretariat, 1964–1975, Box 12, S/S Staff Meeting. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/119775.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.” International Organization 52 (4) (1998), 887–917.
Fischer, Wolfgang. “Nuclear Non-proliferation and Safeguards: From INFCIRC/153 to INFCIRC/540 and Beyond.” In Tightening the Reins, eds. Erwin Häckel and Gotthard Stein (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2000), 9–21.
Fuhrmann, Matthew. Atomic Assistance: How “Atoms for Peace” Programs Cause Nuclear Insecurity (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012).
Gilpin, Robert. “The Theory of Hegemonic War.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4) (1988), 591–613.
Glennon, Michael. “Why the Security Council Failed.” Foreign Affairs 82 (3) (2003), 16–35.
Gray, William Glenn. “Commercial Liberties and Nuclear Anxieties: The US-German Feud over Brazil, 1975–7.” International History Review 34 (3) (2012), 449–474.
Gruber, Lloyd. Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000).
Häckel, Erwin. “West Germany’s Nuclear Export Policy and Non-Proliferation.” Asian Perspective 3 (1) (1979), 11–39.
Hibbs, Mark. The Future of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2011).
Hofhansel, Claus. Commercial Competition and National Security: Comparing US and German Export Control Policies (Westport, Conn: Praeger, 1996).
“India: Nuclear Helpers.” Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control, 1 March 1995. http://www.wisconsinproject.org/india-nuclear-helpers.
Joyner, Daniel. Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011).
Kaiser, Karl. “The Great Nuclear Debate: German-American Disagreements.” Foreign Policy 30 (Spring 1978), 83–110
Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. “Transnational Advocacy Networks in International and Regional Politics.” International Social Science Journal 51 (159) (1999), 89–101.
Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).
Kerr, Paul, “U.S. Nuclear Cooperation with India: Issues for Congress.” (Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 26 June 22012).
Kindleberger, Charles. “Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides.” International Studies Quarterly 25 (2) (1981), 242–254.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. Norms, Rules and Decisions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989)
Krauthammer, Charles. “The Unipolar Moment.” Foreign Affairs 70 (1) (Winter 1990/1991).
Margolis, Eric. War at the Top of the World: The Struggle for Afghanistan, Kashmir and Tibet (New York: Routledge, 2004).
McKeown, Ryder. “Norm Regress: US Revisionism and the Slow Death of the Torture Norm.” International Relations 23 (1) (2009), 5–25.
Mearsheimer, John. “The False Promise of International Institutions.” International Security 19 (3) (1994), 5–49.
“Memorandum of Conversation Energy; North Sea Oil; Foreign Assistance; Nuclear Non-Proliferation; CSCE; Trade Bill.” 7 July 1974, RG 59, Office of the Counselor, 1955–77 (Helmut Sonnenfeldt), Box 4, Britain 1974. Obtained and contributed by William Burr. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/119774.
“Memorandum to the Secretary of State from ACDA Director Fred Ikle and Policy Planning Staff Director Winston Lord, ‘Analytical Staff Meeting on Non-Proliferation Strategy.’ ” 31 July 1974, History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive, RG 59, Records of the Policy Planning Staff, Director’s Files (Winston Lord), 1969–1977, Box 344, July 1974. Obtained and contributed by William Burr. http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/119776.
Müller, Harald, and Carmen Wunderlich. “Not Lost in Contestation: How Norm Entrepreneurs Frame Norm Development in the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime.” Contemporary Security Policy 39 (3) (2018), 341–366.
“Nuclear Suppliers Conference/French Participation.” 26 March 1975. https://nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/ebb467/docs/doc%2013D%203-26-75%20background%20on%20French%20participation.pdf.
“The Nuclear Suppliers Group: Its Origins, Role and Activities.” International Atomic Energy Agency. Attachment to INFCIRC/539/Rev.1, April 2000. https://www.iaea.org ⟩ sites ⟩ default ⟩ files ⟩ infcirc539r1.
Oye, Kenneth. “Explaining Cooperation under Anarchy: Hypotheses and Strategies.” World Politics 38 (1) (1985), 1–24.
Panke, Diana, and Ulrich Petersohn. “Why International Norms Disappear Sometimes.” European Journal of International Relations 18 (4) (2012), 719–742.
Paterson, Tony. “Leaked Report Says German and US Firms Supplied Arms to Saddam.” The Independent, 18 December 2002. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/leaked-report-says-german-and-us-firms-supplied-arms-to-saddam-136466.html. Patti, Carlo. “Origins and Evolution of the Brazilian Nuclear Program (1947–2011).” Wilson Center, 15 November 2012. https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/origins-and-evolution-the-brazilian-nuclear-program-1947-2011.
Perry, Todd E. The Origins and Implementation of the 1992 Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) Agreement. Dissertation (Department of Govenrment and Politics, University of Maryland at College Park, 2002).
Potter, William. “The New Nuclear Producers: The Main Threat to Supply-Side Restraints?” In Limiting the Proliferation of Weapons: the Role of Supply-side Strategies, ed. Jean-François Rioux (Ottawa: Carleton University Press, 1992).
Potter, William. “The Post-Soviet States and the Nuclear Nonproliferation Regime.” In The Nuclear Challenge in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, ed. George Quester (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1995).
“Press Statement of Nuclear Suppliers Meeting.” Warsaw, Poland, 3 April 1992. http://www.nuclearsuppliersgroup.org/images/Files/Documents-page/Public_Statements/1992-Press.pdf.
Quester, George H. The Politics of Nuclear Proliferation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1973).
Romberg, Dennis. “How to Further Develop the Nonproliferation Regime? West German Nuclear Exports to Brazil and Iran in Context of US Criticism.” International History Review 40 (5) (2018), 1–21.
Ruggie, John. “International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order.” International Organization 36 (2) (1982), 379–415.
Sandholtz, Wayne. “Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (1) (2008), 101–131.
Schmidt, Fritz W. “The Zangger Committee: Its History and Future Role.” Nonproliferation Review 2 (1) (1994), 38–44.
“The Secretary’s Analytical Staff Meeting on Non-Proliferation.” 2 August 1974. RG 59, Transcripts of Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger Staff Meetings, 1973–1977, Box 4. Obtained and contributed by William Burr. https://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/119777.
Shen, Zhihua, and Yafeng Xia. Between Aid and Restriction: The Soviet Union’s Changing Policies on China’s Nuclear Weapons Program, 1954–1960. Asian Perspective 36 (1) (2012), 95–122.
Simone, Courteix. “Les Accords de Londres Entre Pays Exportateurs d’ Equipements et de Matériel Nucléaires.” Annuaire Français de Droit International 22 (1976), 27–50.
Strulak, Tadeusz. “The Nuclear Suppliers Group.” The Nonproliferation Review 1 (1) (1993), 2–10.
U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency 1990 and 1990 Annual Reports, 102nd Congress, 2nd session, S. PRT. 102–131 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1993).
Wiener, Antje. “Contested compliance: Interventions on the Normative structure of World Politics.” European Journal of International Relations 10 (2) (2004), 189–234.
Wunderlich, Carmen. “Theoretical Approaches in Norm Dynamics” In Norm Dynamics in Multilateral Arms Control: Interests, Conflicts, and Justice, eds. Harald Müller and Carmen Wunderlich (Athens: University of Georgia Press 2013).
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 836 | 92 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 65 | 20 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 152 | 33 | 0 |
Like other normative systems, the international nuclear export control norms are incomplete and at times contradictory. Thus, contestations to the international nuclear export control norms inevitably emerge, as they did in the wake of the 1974 Indian nuclear test and the 1991 discovery of Iraq’s nuclear weapons program. These two nuclear crises prompted intense debates regarding the adequacy of the existing norms. The outcome of the debates generated overwhelming agreement and action among nuclear suppliers that they required strengthening. Drawing on Wayne Sandholtz’s theory of normative change, which argues that events trigger disputes whose outcomes modify norms, this article illustrates how the nuclear export control norms have evolved in a cyclical fashion. The article aims to contribute to the constructivist literature on normative change and discusses policy implications.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 836 | 92 | 2 |
Full Text Views | 65 | 20 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 152 | 33 | 0 |