Save

The Road Most Traveled By

Three Hypotheses about Influential Norms at the United Nations General Assembly Identified by Main Path Analysis

In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Author:
Rafael Mesquita Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) Graduate Program in Political Science (PPGCP) Recife Brazil

Search for other papers by Rafael Mesquita in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6042-1606
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This article applies main path analysis to UN General Assembly (UNGA) resolutions as a novel way to identify what documents and themes have mattered most in the evolution of the organization. Three successive corpora containing all resolutions adopted by the UNGA during its first fifteen, thirty-five, and seventy-three years were analyzed. Results show that the theme of the main path of the first fifteen sessions was Palestine, and peacekeeping/budget for the other two corpora. Three concluding hypotheses are proposed as possible explanations for this finding. Main paths in networks of international norms might be understood as indicators of ongoing issues, as a sign of groundedness, or as residue from preferential attachment. This paper trail reconstructs relevant chapters of the UN’s institutional development and reveals that texts of little fame can nonetheless be at the origin of large bodies of later works, and that jurisprudential density varies across UNGA topics.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 290 290 37
Full Text Views 29 29 12
PDF Views & Downloads 99 99 40