Sustainably Financing the World Health Organization
A Narrative Literature Review
In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International OrganizationsSearch for other papers by Andrew Harmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The Covid 19 pandemic catalysed interest from the international community to sustainably fund the World Health Organization (WHO). Though given fresh impetus, the WHO’s financing dialogue has a history that has attracted minimal scholarly attention. To address this knowledge gap, a narrative literature review of the WHO’s financing for the period 2009–2024 was conducted. One hundred and thirteen documents were reviewed from which eight core themes were identified: flexibility, predictability, duration, focus, vulnerability, alignment, contingency and realism. The review recounts how successive Director Generals of the WHO have attempted to reform how the organization is funded. It finds that sustainably financing the WHO is more complex and reliant on inter-dependent variables than current definitions would suggest. Ongoing efforts to align donor and secretariat financing priorities have the potential to increase rather than reduce vulnerability. Furthermore, realist assumptions present a barrier to sustainably financing the WHO that we need.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Braun, V., and Clarke, V. “Using thematic analysis in psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2006), 77–101
-
Clift, C. What’s the world health organization for? Final report from the centre on global health security working group on health governance. London: Chatham House, 2014.
-
Daugirdas K., and Burci G.L. “Financing the World Health organization.” International Organizations Law review. 16 (2019), 299–338.
-
Equal International. Building a better system: Making Global Public Investment a reality. Recommendations of the Expert Working Group on Global Public Investment. July 2022. https://www.equalinternational.org/_files/ugd/c84547_da636dcf31f744b5ae29cf1fee15b634.pdf
-
Ferrari, R. “Writing narrative style literature reviews.” Medical Writing 24 (4) (2015), 230–234.
-
Glennie, J. The Future of Aid: Global Public Investment. London: Routledge. 2020.
-
Gostin, L. “Reforming the WHO after Ebola.” JAMA April 14 (2015), 313:14.
-
Graham E. “Money and multilateralism: How funding rules constitute IO governance.” International Theory. 7 (1) (2015), 162–194.
-
Green, B., Johnson, C., and Adams, A. “Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: Secrets of the trade.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine5 (3) (2006), 101–117.
-
Independent Panel on Pandemic Preparedness and Response. Covid-19: Make it the Last Pandemic. IPPPR, May 2021. https://theindependentpanel.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COVID-19-Make-it-the-Last-Pandemic_final.pdf
-
Iwunna O., Kennedy J., and Harmer A. “Flexibly financing WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions.” BMJ Global Health (2023), 8:e011232.
-
Jamison D.T., Frenk J., and Knaul F. “International collective action in health: objectives, functions, and rationale.” Lancet 351 (1998), 514–517.
-
M’ikanatha NM, Welliver DP. Strengthening the who in the pandemic era by removing a persistent structural defect in financing. Globalization and Health 17 (2021), 142.
-
Mazzucato M. Mission Economy: A moonshot guide to changing capitalism. (London: Allen Lane, 2021).
-
OECD. Paris declaration on aid effectiveness. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2005.
-
Patnaik, P. “The U.S. allegedly threatened to withhold financing from WHO unless its text on “earmarking” contributions was agreed to in the decision on the replenishment proposal”. Geneva Health Files, 23 May 2023.
-
https://genevahealthfiles.substack.com/p/the-us-allegedly-threatened-to-withhold
-
Reddy S.K., Mazhar S., and Lencucha R. “The financial sustainability of the world Health organization and the political economy of global health governance: a review of financing proposals.” Globalization and Health 14 (2018), 119.
-
Reid-Henry, S., Liden, J., Saminarsih, D., et. al. A new paradigm is needed for financing the pandemic fund. The Lancet 400 (2022), 345–346.
-
Schmid L.K., Reitzenstein A., and Hall N. “Blessing or Curse? The effects of earmarked funding in UNICEF and UNDP.” Global Governance 27 (2021) 433–459.
-
UNGA. Scale of assessments for the apportionment of the expenses of the United Nations. A/RES/76/238. Geneva: UNGA, 2022.
-
Wendt A. Social Theory of International Politics. London: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
-
Wenham C., and Davies S.E. “What’s the ideal World Health Organization (WHO)?” Health Economics, Policy and Law. (2023), 1–12.
-
World Health Organization. Eleventh General Programme of Work, 2006–2015. A59/25 (25 April 2006).
-
World Health Organization. Implementation of programme budget 2008–2009: interim report. Report by the Secretariat. A62/26 (2 April 2009).
-
World Health Organization. Draft programme budget 2010–2011. PPB/2010–2011 (2009b)
-
World Health Organization. The future of financing for WHO: Report of an informal consultation convened by the Director-General. WHO/DGO/2010.1 (12–13 January 2010a).
-
World Health Organization. The future of financing for WHO Report by the Director-General. EB128/21 (15 December 2010b)
-
World Health Organization. The future of financing for WHO World Health Organization: reforms for a healthy future. Report by the Director-General. A64/4 (5 May 2011a).
-
World Health Organization. WHO reform Managerial reform: making WHO’s financing more predictable Report by the Secretariat. EB130/5 Add.5 (22 December 2011b).
-
World Health Organization. WHO reforms for a healthy future: Report by the Director General. EBSS/2/2 (15 October 2011c).
-
World Health Organization. Proposals to improve WHO’s financing Report by the Secretariat. EBPBAC/EXO2/2 (23 November 2012a).
-
World Health Organization. WHO reform: Independent evaluation report: stage one. A65/5 Add. 2 (18 May 2012b).
-
World Health Organization. Director-General addresses reforms in WHO financing. (16 December 2012c) https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/director-general-addresses-reforms-in-who-financing [Accessed 24 August 2024].
-
World Health Organization. WHO reform Financing of WHO. A66/48 (13 May 2013a).
-
World Health Organization. Overview of WHO reform implementation Report by the Secretariat. EB140/38 (15 November 2016).
-
World Health Organization. Better value, better health: Towards a strategy and plan for value for money in WHO. A70/INF./6 (16 May 2017a).
-
World Health Organization. Assessed contributions by Member States and Associate Members, showing a 10% increase in total assessed contribution financing for 2018–2019. EB140/INF./5 (18 January 2017b).
-
World Health Organization. Seventieth World Health Assembly: Resolutions and Decisions annexes. WHA70/2017/REC/1 (22–31 May 2017c).
-
World Health Organization. Draft thirteenth general programme of work 2019–2023
-
Promote health, keep the world safe, serve the vulnerable. EBSS4/2 (1 November 2017d)
-
World Health Organization. Draft thirteenth general programme of work 2019–2023 Promote health, keep the world safe, serve the vulnerable Revized following the special session of the Executive Board in November 2017. EB142/3Rev.2 (26 January 2018a).
-
World Health Organization. Report of the Programme, Budget and Administration Committee of the Executive Board. EB142/25 (22 January 2018b).
-
World Health Organization. WHO reform. Better value, better health: Strategy and implementation plan for value for money in WHO Report by the Director-General. EB142/7 Rev.1 (12 January 2018c).
-
World Health Organization. Programme budget 2020–2021 WHO resource mobilization strategy Report by the Director-General. EB146/29 (23 December 2019a).
-
World Health Organization. Proposed programme budget 2020–2021 Operationalizing the Proposed programme budget 2020–2021. A72/INF./2 (13 May 2019b).
-
World Health Organization. Seventy-third World Health Assembly: Resolutions and Decisions. WHA73/2020/REC/1. Para. 7.15, p. 7 (18–19 May 2020a).
-
World Health Organization. Executive Board 146th Session. Resolutions and Decisions. EB146/2020/REC/1 (3–8 February 2020b).
-
World Health Organization. Sustainable financing: Report by the Director-General. EB148/26 (11 January 2021a).
-
World Health Organization. WHO budgeting and financing: A historical overview. First meeting of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing, Geneva, 29–31 March 2021. EB/WGSF/1/4 (24 March 2021b).
-
World Health Organization. WHO sustainable financing Options for the consideration of the Working Group. EB/WGSF/1/3 (24 March 2021c).
-
World Health Organization. First meeting of the working group on sustainable financing. Geneva, 29–31 March 2021. EB/WGSF/1/1 (23 March 2021d).
-
World Health Organization. Meeting report of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing. EB/WGSF3/3 (9 July 2021e).
-
World Health Organization. Sustainable financing. Report of the first and second meeting of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing: Report by the Director-General. A74/6 (14 May 2021f).
-
World Health Organization. Seventy-fifth World Health Assembly: report of the Working Group. Report by the Director General. A75/9. (13 May 2022a).
-
World Health Organization. Rationale for an increase in assessed contributions: Background document. EB/WGSF/7/INF./1. (22 April 2022b)
-
World Health Organization. Deliberations of the Bureau of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing on options for an increase in assessed contributions Background document. EB/WGSF/7/INF./2 (21 April 2022c).
-
World Health Organization. Meeting report of the Working Group on Sustainable Financing. EB/WGSF/5/4 (4 January 2022d).
-
World Health Organization. Financing and implementation of the Programme budget 2022–2023 and outlook on financing of the Programme budget 2024–2025: Report by the Director-General. A76/18 (10 May 2023a).
-
World Health Organization. Sustainable financing: feasibility of a replenishment mechanism, including options for consideration Report by the Director-General. A76/32 (11 May 2023b).
-
World Health Organization. Matters emanating from the Working Group on Sustainable Financing Sustainable financing: feasibility of a replenishment mechanism, including options for consideration. Report of the Programme, Budget and Administration Committee of the Executive Board to the Seventy-sixth World Health Assembly. A76/40 (22 May 2023c).
-
World Health Organization. Matters emanating from the Working Group on Sustainable Financing Secretariat implementation plan on reform Report of the Programme, Budget and Administration Committee of the Executive Board to the Seventy-sixth World Health Assembly. A76/38 (22 May 2023f).
-
World Health Organization. Audited financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2022. A76/17 (12 May 2023g).
-
World Health Organization. Health for all: Transforming economies to deliver what matters. (Geneva: World Health Organization, 2023h).
-
World Health Organization. Sustainable financing: WHO investment round Report by the Director-General. A77/17 (18 April 2024a)
-
World Health Organization. Draft fourteenth general programme of work, 2025–2028
-
Report by the Director-General. A77/16 (3 May 2024b)
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 251 | 251 | 251 |
| Full Text Views | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 21 | 21 | 21 |
Sustainably Financing the World Health Organization
A Narrative Literature Review
In: Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International OrganizationsSearch for other papers by Andrew Harmer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The Covid 19 pandemic catalysed interest from the international community to sustainably fund the World Health Organization (WHO). Though given fresh impetus, the WHO’s financing dialogue has a history that has attracted minimal scholarly attention. To address this knowledge gap, a narrative literature review of the WHO’s financing for the period 2009–2024 was conducted. One hundred and thirteen documents were reviewed from which eight core themes were identified: flexibility, predictability, duration, focus, vulnerability, alignment, contingency and realism. The review recounts how successive Director Generals of the WHO have attempted to reform how the organization is funded. It finds that sustainably financing the WHO is more complex and reliant on inter-dependent variables than current definitions would suggest. Ongoing efforts to align donor and secretariat financing priorities have the potential to increase rather than reduce vulnerability. Furthermore, realist assumptions present a barrier to sustainably financing the WHO that we need.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 251 | 251 | 251 |
| Full Text Views | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 21 | 21 | 21 |