Carbon Reduction in the Post-Kyoto era. Have we progressed? A comparison

In: Global Journal of Comparative Law
Bruno Zeller Assoc. Professor, Victoria UniversityAdjunct Professor, School of Law, Murdoch University – PerthAssociate, The Institute for Logistics and Supply Chain Management, Victoria University,

Search for other papers by Bruno Zeller in
Current site
Google Scholar
Michael Longo Associate Professor, School of Law Victoria University,

Search for other papers by Michael Longo in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


In a fragmented global environment, the efforts of state and non-state actors are important in assessing the state of play on climate change mitigation actions around the world. This article will consider from a comparative perspective the various legislative models for addressing climate change and the reduction of GHG emissions with particular focus on the EU, USA, Australia and Switzerland. As legal developments are not limited to legislative schemes, this article will examine the voluntary carbon offset market and other trade related solutions to GHG emissions which have emerged in the absence of mandatory limitation systems. Also warranting attention are the actions of private parties in common law jurisdictions to bring legal proceedings against power companies for damage caused by climate change. Together, these developments demonstrate that climate change abatement is not the sole remit of the legislature.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 165 22 1
Full Text Views 61 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 12 4 0