Save

The Japanese Cooperation Agreement System in Practice: Derived from the U.S. Plea Bargaining System but Different

In: Global Journal of Comparative Law
Author:
Haruhi Abe Bachelor of Law ( Kyoto University), Juris Doctor ( The University of Tokyo School of Law), Master of Laws ( University of California, Berkeley, School of Law), Master of Laws in Technology, Media and Telecommunications Law (Queen Mary, University of London), Attorney-at-law, Nishimura & Asahi, Osaka, Japan

Search for other papers by Haruhi Abe in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

On 1 June 2018, the Japanese cooperation agreement system was introduced, and its effectiveness has been examined through cases including the Carlos Ghosn Case. Although it was devised by emulating the U.S. plea bargaining system, there are major differences. It has the potential to thoroughly change the Japanese criminal system. However, the portrayal of the new system in academic discourse is quite inaccurate. This article analyses the Japanese cooperation agreement system in comparison with the U.S. plea bargaining system in order to give an accurate understanding and identify points that need attention. The article also gives a background to the Japanese version of criminal immunity to help provide a context to the new system.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 409 293 14
Full Text Views 315 15 0
PDF Views & Downloads 450 18 1