For Neoplatonic philosophers, the Delphic oracle had authoritatively characterized their two great teachers, Iamblichus and Porphyry. Later Platonists cited the Pythia’s oracular pronouncement, “The Syrian is full of god; the Phoenican a polymath” as revealed wisdom. The Syrian Iamblichus, “full of god,” was more highly regarded in Platonic circles than the learned Porphyry, but because Iamblichus’ theurgical Platonism vanished after the sixth century, we are left with only “learned” reports about theurgic divination. Contemporary scholars are polymaths; we are the children of Porphyry. So, when Porphyry asks for a precise definition of theurgic divination, it seems entirely reasonable, and it is hard for us to appreciate Iamblichus’ barbed response. He chastises Porphyry for presuming that divination can be discursively explained and says he needs a talisman (ἀλεξιοφάρµακον) to protect him from his discursive addiction. Divination, he says, can only be known through experiences that awaken the soul to an innate gnosis that precedes dualist thinking. This paper will explore that talismanic gnosis.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ahbel-Rappe Sara , 'Damascius’ ', in Problems and Solutions Concerning First Principles , (Oxford University Press , Oxford 2006 ).
Athanassiadi Polymnia , '“The Oecumenism of Iamblichus: Latent Knowledge and Its Awakening.” ', in Henry Jacob & E. Gillian Clarke (eds), The Divine Iamblichus: Philosopher and Man of Gods , (Bristol Classical , London 1995 ) 244 -250 Review of Blumenthal 1993 Journal of Roman Studies .
Athanassiadi Polymnia , La lutte pour l’orthodoxie dans le platonisme tardif: de Numénius à Damascius , (Les Belles Lettres , Paris 2006 ) LÂne d’or .
Athanassiadi Polymnia , Damascius: The Philosophical History, text with translation and notes , (Apamea Cultural Association , Athens 1999 ).
Bussanich John , '“Socrates the Mystic.” ', in John Cleary (ed), Traditions of Platonism: Essays in Honor of John Dillon , (Ashgate Publishing , Aldershot 1999 ) 29 -51 .
Emma Clarke, John Dillon & Jackson Hershbell (eds), Iamblichus. On the Mysteries , (Society of Biblical Literature , Atlanta 2003 ) 2003 .
David , 'In Porphyrii Isagogen commentarium ', in Maria Pantelia (ed), Thesaurus Linguae Graecae Digital Library , (University of California , Irvine ) http://www.tlg.uci.edu .
Ellman Richard , Yeats: The Man and the Masks , (W.W. Norton , New York 1948 ) Gifford, Edwin Hamilton. 1903. Eusebius. Preparation for the Gospel, iv.7. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
André-Jean Festugière & Arthur Darby Nock (eds), Corpus Hermeticum , (Les Belles Lettres , Paris 1954 ) 4 vols .
Finamore John & Dillon John , 'Iamblichus ', in De Anima: Text, translation and commentary , (Brill , Leiden 2002 ) Philosophia Antiqua .
Gerrit-Westerink Leender & Combès Joseph , 'Damascius ', in Traité des Premiers Principes , (Les Belles Lettres , Paris 1986 ).
'Plato, The Apology, in Plato ', in Edith Hamilton & Huntington Cairns (eds), Collected Dialogues , (Princeton University Press , Princeton 1973 ).
Kingsley Peter , Reality , (The Golden Sufi Center , Inverness, CA 2003 ).
Lawrence D.H. , Selected Poetry , (Penguin , New York 1986 ).
Rappe Sara , Reading Neoplatonism: Non-discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus, and Damascius , (Cambridge University Press , Cambridge 2000 ).
Shaw Gregory , '“The Talisman: Magic and True Philosophers,” ', in Angela Voss & Jean Lall (eds), The Imaginal Cosmos: Imagination, divination, and the sacred , (University of Kent , Canterbury 2007 ).
Shaw Gregory , '“The Chōra of the Timaeus and Iamblichean Theurgy.” ' (2012 ) 3 (2 ) Horizons: Seoul Journal of Humanities : 103 -129 .
David, In Porphyrii isagogen commentarium 92 4. Cited by Athanassiadi 1995, 244.
Athanassiadi 1999, 14.
Iamblichus, Myst. 99.9 (Clarke, Dillon, and Hershbell 2003). References follow the Parthey pagination used by the translators who serve as the basis for my translations.
Iamblichus, De Anima 30.24–27 (Finamore and Dillon 2002). Cf. Iamblichus, Myst. 2.8–3.4.
Iamblichus, Myst. 259.5–14. A similar criticism of the Greeks in contrast to the Egyptians is found in the Hermetic corpus (Corp herm. xvi.2): “For the Greeks, O King, who make logical demonstrations, use words emptied of power, and this very activity is what constitutes their philosophy, a mere noise of words. But we [Egyptians] do not [so much] use words (λόγοι) but sounds (ϕωναι) which are full of effects” (Nock and Festugière 1954–1960; reprint 1972–1983, 232).
Iamblichus, Myst. 259.10–14. On Iamblichus’s Syrian background and his veneration of traditional forms of worship, see Athanassiadi 2006, 153–60.
Rappe 2000, 27.
Ellman 1948, 289.
Bussanich 1999, 29–52; for Socrates’s erotic power see especially Alcibiades’s speech in Plato, Symp. 215b–222c.
Lawrence 1986, 72. Lawrence emphasizes the experience of receptivity, of our being carried, borne by the wind to another world. Peter Kingsley has emphasized the critical role of “being taken” among ancient philosopher-magicians, seeking the soul’s transformation and deification. He writes: “We can never make our way to the truth. That would be out of the question. Like Parmenides, we have to be taken there instead; all we can do is wait. And it’s only when we finally are taken that we can begin to see just how impossible it would have been to work our way out of the illusion towards the truth” (Kingsley 2003, 257, emphasis mine).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 443 | 52 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 326 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 145 | 12 | 0 |
For Neoplatonic philosophers, the Delphic oracle had authoritatively characterized their two great teachers, Iamblichus and Porphyry. Later Platonists cited the Pythia’s oracular pronouncement, “The Syrian is full of god; the Phoenican a polymath” as revealed wisdom. The Syrian Iamblichus, “full of god,” was more highly regarded in Platonic circles than the learned Porphyry, but because Iamblichus’ theurgical Platonism vanished after the sixth century, we are left with only “learned” reports about theurgic divination. Contemporary scholars are polymaths; we are the children of Porphyry. So, when Porphyry asks for a precise definition of theurgic divination, it seems entirely reasonable, and it is hard for us to appreciate Iamblichus’ barbed response. He chastises Porphyry for presuming that divination can be discursively explained and says he needs a talisman (ἀλεξιοφάρµακον) to protect him from his discursive addiction. Divination, he says, can only be known through experiences that awaken the soul to an innate gnosis that precedes dualist thinking. This paper will explore that talismanic gnosis.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 443 | 52 | 3 |
Full Text Views | 326 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 145 | 12 | 0 |