Knowledge, Pragmatics, and Error

in Grazer Philosophische Studien
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

‘Know-that’, like so many natural language expressions, exhibits patterns of use that provide evidence for its context-sensitivity. A popular family of views – call it pragmatic invariantism – attempts to explain the shifty patterns by appeal to a pragmatic thesis: while the semantic meaning of ‘know-that’ is stable across all contexts of use, sentences of the form ‘S knows [doesn’t know] that p’ can be used to communicate a pragmatic content that depends on the context of use. In this paper, the author argues that pragmatic invariantism makes inaccurate predictions for a wide range of well-known use data and is committed to attributing systematic pragmatic error to ordinary speakers. But pragmatic error is unprecedented, and it is doubtful that speakers are systematically wrong about what they intend to communicate.

Knowledge, Pragmatics, and Error

in Grazer Philosophische Studien

Sections

References

BachKent. 1994. Conversational Impliciture. Mind and Language912462.

BachKent. 2010. Knowledge In and Out of Context. 105–36 of: Campbell J. K. O’Rourke M. & Silverstein H. (eds.) Knowledge and Skepticism. Topics in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

BachKent & HarnishRobert. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

BaumannPeter. 2011. wams: Why Worry?Philosophical Papers40(2) 15577.

BeebeJames R. (ed.). 2014. Advances in Experimental Epistemology. London and New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

BlackTim. 2005. Classic Invariantism, Relevance and Warranted Assertability Manoevres. The Philosophical Quarterly55(219) 32836.

BlackTim. 2008. A Warranted-assertability Defense of a Moorean Response to Skepticism. Acta Analytica23(3) 187205.

Blome-TillmannMichael. 2013. Knowledge and Implicatures. Synthese190(18) 42934319.

Blome-TillmannMichael. 2014. Knowledge and Presuppositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BonJourLaurence. 2010. The Myth of Knowledge. Philosophical Perspectives24(1) 5783.

BrownJessica. 2005. Adapt or Die: the Death of Invariantism?The Philosophical Quarterly55(219) 26385.

BrownJessica. 2006. Contextualism and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres. Philosophical Studies130(3) 407435.

CappelenHerman. 2005. Pluralistic Skepticism. Philosophical Perspectives19.

CappelenHerman. 2008. The Creative Interpreter: Content Relativism and Assertion. Philosophical Perspectives222346.

CappelenHerman & LeporeErnie. 2005. Insensitive Semantics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

ChrismanMatthew. 2007. From Epistemic Contextualism to Epistemic Expressivism. Philosophical Studies135(2) 22554.

CohenStewart. 1986. Knowledge and Context. The Journal of Philosophy83(10) 574583.

CohenStewart. 1987. Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards. Synthese73(1) 326.

CohenStewart. 1999. Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons. Noûs335789.

ConeeEarl. 2005. Contextualism Contested. 47–56 of: Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.) Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell.

DavisWayne. 2007. Knowledge claims and context: loose use. Philosophical Studies132(3) 395438.

DavisWayne A.2004. Are Knowledge Claims Indexical?Erkenntnis61(2) 25781.

DavisWayne A.2015. Knowledge claims and context: belief. Philosophical Studies172(2) 399432.

DeRoseKeith. 1992. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research5291329.

DeRoseKeith. 1995. Solving the Skeptical Problem. The Philosophical Review104(1) 152.

DeRoseKeith. 2009. The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge Skepticism and Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

DimmockPaul & HuvenesTorfinnThomesen. 2014. Knowledge, conservatism, and pragmatics. Synthese191(14) 323969.

DingesAlexander. 2015a. Innocent implicatures. Journal of Pragmatics875463.

DingesAlexander. 2015b. Skeptical pragmatic invariantism: good, but not good enough. Synthese117.

DouvenIgor. 2007. A Pragmatic Dissolution of Harman’s Paradox. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research74(2) 32645.

DouvenIgor. 2010. The Pragmatics of Belief. Journal of Pragmatics423547.

DretskeFred I.1970. Epistemic Operators. The Journal of Philosophy67(24) 10071023.

FantlJeremy & McGrathMatthew. 2002. Evidence, Pragmatics, and Justification. The Philosophical Review111(1) 6794.

FantlJeremy & McGrathMatthew. 2009. Knowledge in an Uncertain World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

FeldmanRichard. 2001. Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions. Philosophical Studies103(1) 6185.

GerkenMikkel. 2012. On the Cognitive Bases of Knowledge Ascriptions. 140–70 of: Brown Jessica & Gerken Mikkel (eds.) Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

GerkenMikkel. 2013. Epistemic Focal Bias. Australasian Journal of Philosophy91(1) 4161.

GreenoughPatrick. 2011. Truth-Relativism, Norm-Relativism, and Assertion. In: Brown Jessica & Cappelen Herman (eds.) Assertion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

GriceH. P.1957. Meaning. The Philosophical Review66(3) 377388.

GricePaul. 1969. Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions. The Philosophical Review6814777. Reprinted in Grice (1989a 86–116).

GricePaul. 1975. Logic and Conversation. 41–58 of: Cole Peter & Morgan Jerry (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

GricePaul. 1989b. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.

HawthorneJohn. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HazlettAllan. 2009. Knowledge and Conversation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research78(3) 591620.

IchikawaJonathan. 2010. Quantifiers and Epistemic Contextualism. Philosophical Studies15538398.

KindermannDirk. 2012. Perspective in Context. Relative Truth Knowledge and the First Person. Ph.D. thesis University of St Andrewsurl <http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3164>.

KindermannDirk. 2013. Relativism, sceptical paradox, and semantic blindness. Philosophical Studies162(3) 585603.

KindermannDirk. 2016. Embedding Knowledge. Manuscript.

KnobeJoshua & YalcinSeth. 2014. Epistemic Modals and Context: Experimental Data. Semantics and Pragmatics7(10) 121.

KompaNicola. 2002. The context sensitivity of knowledge ascriptions. Grazer Philosophische Studien647996.

LewisDavid. 1996. Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy74(4) 54967.

LockeDustin. 2015. Implicature and Non-Local Pragmatic Encroachment. Synthese124. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0965-0

LutzMatt. 2014. The Pragmatics of Pragmatic Encroachment. Synthese191(8) 17171740.

MacFarlaneJohn. 2005. The Assessment-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. 197–233 of: Gendler Tamar Szabó & Hawthorne John (eds.) Oxford Studies in Epistemology 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MacFarlaneJohn. 2009. Nonindexical Contextualism. Synthese16623150.

MacFarlaneJohn. 2011. Relativism and Knowledge Attributions. In: Bernecker Sven & Pritchard Duncan (eds.) Routledge Companion to Epistemology.

MacFarlaneJohn. 2014. Assessment Sensitivity. Relative Truth and Its Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

MarmaridouSophia S.A.2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.

MarquesTeresa. 2015. Retractions. Synthese 1–25. doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0852-8

MeibauerJörg. 2009. Implicature. 365–78 of: Mey Jacob L. (ed.) Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

MeibauerJörg. 2014. Lying at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

MillerZachary. 2016. The Reformulation Argument: Reining in Gricean Pragmatics. Philosophical Studies173(2) 52546.

MontminyMartin. 2009a. Contextualism, Invariantism, and Semantic Blindness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy87(4) 63957.

MontminyMartin. 2009b. Contextualism, Relativism and Ordinary Speakers’ Judgments. Philosophical Studies143(3) 34156.

NagelJennifer. 2010a. Epistemic Anxiety and Adaptive Invariantism. Philosophical Perspectives24(1) 40735.

NagelJennifer. 2010b. Knowledge Ascriptions and the Psychological Consequences of thinking about Error. The Philosophical Quarterly60(239) 286306.

NetaRam. 2003. Skepticism, Contextualism, and Semantic Self-Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research67396411.

NozickRobert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

PritchardDuncan. 2010. Contextualism, Skepticism, and Warranted Assertability Maneuvres. 85–104 of: Keim-Campbell J. O’Rourke M. & Silverstein H. (eds.) Knowledge and Skepticism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

RichardMark. 2004. Contextualism and Relativism. Philosophical Studies119(1) 21542.

RichardMark. 2008. When Truth Gives Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

RysiewPatrick. 2001. The Context-Sensitivity of Knowledge Attributions. Noûs35(4) 477514.

RysiewPatrick. 2005. Contesting Contextualism. Grazer Philosophische Studien69(1) 5170.

RysiewPatrick. 2007. Speaking of Knowing. Noûs41(4) 62762.

SchafferJonathan. 2004a. From Contextualism to Contrastivism. Philosophical Studies119(1) 73103.

SchafferJonathan. 2004b. Skepticism, Contextualism, and Discrimination. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research69(1) 13855.

SchafferJonathan & SzabóZoltán Gendler. 2014. Epistemic Comparativism: A Contextualist Semantics for Knowledge Ascriptions. Philosophical Studies168(2) 491543.

SchifferStephen. 1996. Contextualist Solutions to Scepticism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society9631733.

StanleyJason. 2005. Knowledge and Practical Interests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

WeathersonBrian. 2005. Can We Do Without Pragmatic Encroachment?Philosophical Perspectives1941743.

WeathersonBrian. 2009. Conditionals and Indexical Relativism. Synthese166(2) 333357.

WilliamsonTimothy. 2005. Contextualism, Subject-sensitive Invariantism, and Knowledge of Knowledge. The Philosophical Quarterly55(219) 213235.

2

 See for instance Blome-Tillmann (2014); Cohen (1986 1987 1999); DeRose (1992 1995 2009); Ichikawa (2010); Kompa (2002); Lewis (1996); MacFarlane (2009); Neta (2003); Schaffer (2004a); Schaffer & Szabó (2014).

17

Brown (2006) and Rysiew (2007) in places liken knowledge claims to cases of what Kent Bach calls ‘implicitures’ (Bach 1994). The differences between Gricean conversational implicatures and Bachian implicitures won’t matter to the features of implicatures I discuss here.

33

Hazlett (2009) and Pritchard (2010) also also argue that the pragmatics adds to moderate invariantism’s rejection of scepticism while Brown (2006) Lutz (2014) and Locke (2015) do not explicitly argue for mpi’s potential to address sceptical worries. As I point out below there are good reasons to think that if mpi applies to non-sceptical ordinary knowledge claims it applies to sceptical ones as well.

47

 See Kindermann (2013) and Montminy (2009b) on relativism and Kindermann (2012) for the universal claim.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 9 9 9
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0