Truthfulness and Gricean Cooperation

in Grazer Philosophische Studien
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This paper examines the Gricean view that quality maxims take priority over other conversational maxims. It is shown that Gricean conversational implicatures are routinely inferred from utterances that are recognized to be untruthful. It is argued that this observation falsifies Grice’s original claim that hearers assume that speakers are obeying other maxims only if the speaker is assumed to be obeying quality maxims, and furthermore the related claim that hearers assume that speakers are being cooperative only to the extent that they assume they are being truthful.

Grazer Philosophische Studien

International Journal for Analytic Philosophy

Sections

References

BentonMatthew. (in press). “ Gricean Quality.” Noûs, forthcoming.

CarsonThomas.2006. “ The Definition of Lying.” Noûs40, 284306.

DavisWayne.1998. Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

FallisDon.2009. “ What Is Lying?”Journal of Philosophy106, 2956.

GaukerChristopher.2001. “ Situated Inference versus Conversational Implicatures.” Noûs35, 163189.

GriceH.P.1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

LackeyJennifer.2013. “ Lies and Deception: An Unhappy Divorce.” Analysis73, 236248.

LeporeErnie & StoneMatthew.2015. Imagination and Convention: Distinguishing Grammar and Inference in Language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

LewisDavid.1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

LewisDavid.1975. “Languages and Language.” In: Philosophical Papers, vol. i. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1983, 163188.

NealeStephen.1992. “ Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language.” Linguistics and Philosophy15, 509559.

SaulJennifer.2002. “ Speaker Meaning, What Is Said, and What Is Implied.” Noûs36, 228248.

SorensenRoy.2007. “ Bald-faced Lies! Lying without the Intent to Deceive.” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly88, 251264.

StokkeAndreas.2013. “ Lying and Asserting.” Journal of Philosophycx, 3360.

ThomasonRichmond.1990. “Accommodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics.” In: Intentions in Communication, edited by P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack, Cambridge, Mass. and London: mit Press, 325–363.

10

 For discussion, see Carson (2006), Sorensen (2007), Fallis (2009), Stokke (2013). Some writers, e.g., Lackey (2013), object that, in the relevant examples, the speaker is nevertheless trying to hide information from the hearer. Even if such critics are right, this is irrelevant to my argument, since, in the relevant cases, the hearer is still not assuming that the speaker intended the hearer to assume that the speaker is not violating the First Maxim of Quality.

11

 See also (Grice 1989, 370).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 8 8 8
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0