What Motivates Fregean Anti-Individualism?

in Grazer Philosophische Studien
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In Anti-Individualism and Knowledge Jessica Brown criticises views of content that combine Fregean Sense and anti-individualism. Brown assumes that all Fregean theories are motivated by a picture of the rational thinker as someone who will always have transparent access to the simple inferential consequences of his thoughts. This picture, Brown argues, is incompatible with anti-individualism about content. While traditional Fregean theories have indeed had such motivation, Brown’s mistake is in attributing this motivation to the modern Fregean anti-individualist. My goal in this paper is to bring to light a different, and seldom discussed, motivation for Fregean views of content which is immune to Browns objections.

What Motivates Fregean Anti-Individualism?

in Grazer Philosophische Studien

Sections

References

Brewer Bill 2011. Perception and its Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Brown Jessica 2004. Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass: mit Press.

Burge Tyler 1977/2007. “Belief De Re – with Postscript.” In Foundations of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press4481.

Burge Tyler 1979. “Anti-Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 473121.

Burge Tyler 2009. “Five Theses on De Re States and Attitudes.” In The Philosophy of David Kaplan. Edited by Almog Joseph and Leonardi Paolo . Oxford: Oxford University Press246316.

Boghossian Paul 1994. “The Transparency of Mental Content.” Philosophical Perspectives 83350.

Campbell John 1987. “Is Sense Transparent.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 61273292.

Campbell John 2007. “If Truth is Dethroned what Role Is Left for It?” In: Library of Living Philosophers: The Philosophy of Michael Dummett . Edited by Auxier Randall E. and Hahn Lewis Edwin . Chicago: Open Court Press281300.

Campbell John 2002. Reference and Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dummett Michael 1975. “Frege’s Distinction between Sense and Reference.” In: Truth and other Enigmas. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press116144.

Dummett Michael 1981. Frege: Philosophy of Language. London: Duckworth.

Dummett Michael 1991. The Logical Basis of Metaphysics. London: Duckworth.

Evans Gareth 1982. The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fine Kit 2007. Semantic Relationism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Frege Gottlob 1892. “On Sense and Reference.” In: Philosophical Writings. Edited by Geach Peter and Black Max . Oxford: Blackwell.

McDowell John 1986. “Singular Thought and the Extent of Inner Space.” In: Meaning Knowledge and Reality. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press228259.

McDowell John 1996. Mind and World . Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Putnam Hillary 1975. “The Meaning of “Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7131193.

Recanati Francois 2012. Mental Files. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Schellenberg Susanna 2011. “Perceptual Content Defended.” Noûs 45714750.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 6
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 3 3 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0