Husserl on Essences

A Reconstruction and Rehabilitation

In: Grazer Philosophische Studien
View More View Less
  • 1 Dartmouth College amie.l.thomasson@dartmouth.edu

The common thought that Husserl was committed to a Platonist ontology of essences, and to a mysterious epistemology that holds that we can ‘intuit’ these essences, has contributed substantially to his work being dismissed and marginalized in analytic philosophy. This paper aims to show that it is misguided to dismiss Husserl on these grounds. First, the author aims to explicate Husserl’s views about essences and how we can know them, in ways that make clear that he is not committed to a traditional Platonism, or a mystical epistemology. Second, the author argues that Husserl’s approach was an important source for Carnap in “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology”, where Carnap tried to overcome the empiricists’ qualms about referring to abstracta. Finally, the author will argue that Husserl’s approach can be reconstructed in contemporary analytic terms by appeal to the idea of pleonastic transformations. By seeing both Husserl’s views and their influences on later analytic work more clearly, the hope is to build bridges and make clear that the approach is of lasting value and interest.

  • Carnap Rudolf 1950. “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity . 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1956.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dummett Michael 1981. Frege: Philosophy of Language . 2nd ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

  • Husserl Edmund 1906. Logical Investigations , Volume 1. Translated by Findlay J.N. . New York: Humanity Books, 2000.

  • Husserl Edmund 1913. Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology . Translated by Gibson W.R. Boyce . New York: Collier Books, 1962.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Livingston Paul 2002. “Husserl and Schlick on the Logical Form of Experience.” Synthese 132, 239272.

  • Mohanty Jitendranath 1959. “Individual Fact and Essence in Edmund Husserl’s Philosophy.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20, 222230.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Schiffer Stephen 1994. “A Paradox of Meaning.” Nous 28, 279324.

  • Schiffer Stephen 1996. “Language-Created Language-Independent Entities.” Philosophical Topics 24, 149167.

  • Schiffer Stephen 2003. The Things We Mean . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Schlick Moritz 1910. “The Nature of Truth in Modern Logic.” Originally published in Vierteljahrschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie and Soziologie 34, 386477. Translated by Heath Peter and reprinted in Moritz Schlick: Philosophical Papers Volume 1 (1909–1922), 41–103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smith David Woodruff 1979. “The Case of the Exploding Perception.” Synthese 41, 239269.

  • Smith David Woodruff 2007. Husserl . New York: Routledge.

  • Solomon Robert C. 1970. “Sense and Essence: Frege and Husserl.” International Philosophical Quarterly 10, 378401.

  • Sowa Rochus 2007. “Essences and Eidetic Laws in Edmund Husserl’s Descriptive Eidetics.” The New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 7, 77108.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Sowa Rochus 2012. “Eidetics and its Methodology.” In: The Routledge Companion to Phenomenology , edited by Luft Sebastian and Overgaard Soren , London: Routledge, 254265.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Spelke Elizabeth 1990. “Principles of Object Perception.” Cognitive Science 14, 2936.

  • Thomasson Amie L. 2001. “Ontological Minimalism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 38, 31931.

  • Thomasson Amie L . 2009. “Answerable and Unanswerable Questions.” In: Metametaphysics, edited by Chalmers David , Wasserman Ryan , and Manley David , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 444471.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Thomasson Amie L. 2015. Ontology Made Easy . New York: Oxford University Press.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 225 101 6
Full Text Views 235 17 1
PDF Downloads 39 21 1