Physicalism as a Research Programme

In: Grazer Philosophische Studien
View More View Less
  • 1

It is argued in this paper that physicalism is best understood as a research programme, rather than a thesis or an attitude, as some philosophers argue. Given that research programmes connect past, present and future philosophical or scientific activities, physicalists need not decide between current and future physical theories, as it has been required by Hempel’s Dilemma. The author contrasts this proposal with other solutions to Hempel’s Dilemma proposed by currentists, futurists, and those philosophers who claim that physicalism should best be understood as an attitude, arguing that understanding physicalism as a research programme avoids problems that are present in the alternative views, and that it matches well with the standard classifications in the history of philosophy.

  • Bokulich Peter 2011. “Hempel’s Dilemma and Domains of Physics.” Analysis 71, 646651.

  • Bourget David & David Chalmers, 2014. “What Do Philosophers Believe?Philosophical Studies 170, 465500.

  • Carnap Rudolf 1959. “Psychology in Physical Language.” In: Logical Positivism, edited by Ayer Alfred , New York: The Free Press, 165198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalmers David 1996. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Chalmers David 2010. “The Two-Dimensional Argument against Materialism.” In: The Character of Consciousness, edited by Chalmers David , Oxford: Oxford University Press, 141205.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chalmers David 2011. “Verbal Disputes.” The Philosophical Review 120, 515566.

  • Churchland Patricia . 1986. Neurophilosophy. Cambridge ma: mit Press.

  • Churchland Paul 1996. “The Rediscovery of the Light.” The Journal of Philosophy 93, 211228.

  • Crane Tim & Hugh Mellor 1990. “There Is No Question of Physicalism.” Mind 99, 185206.

  • Crane Tim 2014. “Intentional Objects.” In: Aspects of Psychologism, edited by Crane Tim , Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 111123.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Dennett Daniel 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.

  • Descartes René 1985. “The World or Treatise on Light.” In: The Philosophical Writings of Descartes (vol. i), edited by Cottingham John , Stoothoff Robert & Murdoch Dugald , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8198.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Diaz-Leon Esa 2008. “Defending the Phenomenal Concept Strategy.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86, 597610.

  • Dowell Janice 2006. “The Physical: Empirical, Not Metaphysical.” Philosophical Studies 131, 2560.

  • Garber Daniel 1983. “Mind, Body, and the Laws of Nature in Descartes and Leibniz.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8, 105133.

  • Gillett Carl & Gene Witmer 2001. “A ‘Physical’ Need: Physicalism and the via negativa .” Analysis 61, 302309.

  • Greene Brian 2004. The Fabric of the Cosmos. New York: Vintage.

  • Hameroff Stewart & Roger Penrose 1996. “Conscious Events as Orchestrated Space-Time Selections.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 31, 3653.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hempel Carl 1980. “Comments on Goodman’s Ways of Worldmaking .” Synthese 45, 193200.

  • Johnston Mark 1992. “Constitution Is Not Identity.” Mind 101, 89105.

  • Judisch Neal 2008. “Why ‘Non-mental’ Won’t Work: on Hempel’s Dilemma and the Characterization of the ‘Physical’.” Philosophical Studies 140, 299318.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Kirk Robert 2006. “Physicalism and Strict Implication.” Synthese 151, 523536.

  • Kuhn Thomas 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  • Kuhn Thomas 1970. “Reflections on My Critics”. In: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Lakatos Imre & Musgrave Alan , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lakatos Imre 1978. “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes.” In: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers (vol. i), edited by Worrall John & Currie Gregory , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 8102.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm 1997. “[First] Explanation of the New System of the Communication between Substances, in Reply to What Was Said of It in the Journal for 12 September 1695.” In: Leibniz’s ‘New System’ and Associated Contemporary Texts, edited by Woolhouse Roger & Francks Richard , Oxford: Clarendon Press, 4752.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Maudlin Tim 2012. Philosophy of Physics: Space and Time. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.

  • Melnyk Andrew 1997. “How to Keep the ‘Physical’ in Physicalism.” The Journal of Philosophy 94, 622637.

  • Montero Barbara 1999. “The Body Problem.” Nous 33, 183200.

  • Montero Barbara 2003. “Varieties of Causal Closure”. In: Physicalism and Mental Causation, edited by Walter Sven & Heckmann Heinz-Dieter , Imprint Academic, 173187.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Neurath Otto 1983. “Physicalism: The Philosophy of the Viennese Circle.” In: Otto Neurath: Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, edited by Cohen Robert & Neurath Marie , Dordrecht: Reidel, 4851.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ney Alyssa 2008a. “Defining Physicalism.” Philosophy Compass 3/5, 10331048.

  • Ney Alyssa 2008bPhysicalism as an Attitude.” Philosophical Studies 138, 115.

  • Papineau David 2001. “The Raise of Physicalism”. In: Physicalism and Its Discontents, edited by Gillett Carl & Loewer Barry , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 336.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Smart John 1959. “Sensations and Brain Processes.” The Philosophical Review 68, 141156.

  • van Fraassen Bas 2002. The Empirical Stance . New Haven & London: Yale University Press.

  • Weinert Friedel 2009. Copernicus, Darwin & Freud: Revolutions in the History and Philosophy of Science. Chichester: Blackwell.

  • Wilson Jessica 2006. “On Characterizing the Physical.” Philosophical Studies 131, 6199.

  • Wittgenstein Ludwig 1958. Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Woolhouse Roger 1985. “Leibniz’s Reaction to Cartesian Interaction.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86, 6982.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 205 144 6
Full Text Views 202 2 0
PDF Downloads 12 1 0