Save

Really Expressive Presuppositions and How to Block Them

In: Grazer Philosophische Studien
Authors:
Teresa Marques University of Barcelona, teresamatosferreira@ub.edu

Search for other papers by Teresa Marques in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Manuel García-Carpintero University of Barcelona, m.garciacarpintero@ub.edu

Search for other papers by Manuel García-Carpintero in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Kaplan (1999) argued that a different dimension of expressive meaning (“use-conditional”, as opposed to truth-conditional) is required to characterize the meaning of pejoratives, including slurs and racial epithets. Elaborating on this, writers have argued that the expressive meaning of pejoratives and slurs is either a conventional implicature (Potts 2007) or a presupposition (Macià 2002 and 2014, Schlenker 2007, Cepollaro and Stojanovic 2016). Here the authors argue that an expressive presuppositional theory accounts well for the data, but that expressive presuppositions are not just propositions to be added to a common ground. They hold that expressives, including pejoratives and slurs, make requirements on a contextual record governed by sui generis norms specific to affective attitudes and their expressions.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 786 131 5
Full Text Views 91 23 1
PDF Views & Downloads 128 31 1