Save

The Instability of Slurs

In: Grazer Philosophische Studien
Authors:
Christopher Davis University of the Ryukyus, cmdavis@ll.u-ryukyu.ac.jp

Search for other papers by Christopher Davis in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Elin McCready Aoyama Gakuin University, mccready@cl.aoyama.ac.jp

Search for other papers by Elin McCready in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The authors outline a program for understanding the semantics and pragmatics of slur terms, proposing that slurs are mixed expressives that predicate membership in some social group G while simultaneously invoking a complex of historical facts and social attitudes about G. The authors then point to the importance of distinguishing between the potential offensive and derogatory effects of slur terms, with the former deriving from the impact on the listener of the invoked content itself, and the latter deriving from inferences about speaker attitudes and intentions. The authors use the resulting framework to discuss several controversial cases of slurs and slurring: (i) terms targeting political views such as ‘Nazi’ and ‘terf’, and (ii) cases in which non-slurs are used to derogate, as in cases of misgendering. The authors conclude that what counts as a slur is in part dependent on a background system of ideological assumptions, meaning that whether a particular term counts as a slur will depend in part on one’s ideological commitments and assumptions.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 2607 569 48
Full Text Views 307 102 7
PDF Views & Downloads 606 211 11