The Politics of Norm Glocalisation: Limits in Applying r2p to Protecting Children

In: Global Responsibility to Protect
Jochen Prantl Australian National University, Australia,

Search for other papers by Jochen Prantl in
Current site
Google Scholar
Ryoko Nakano Kanazawa University, Japan,

Search for other papers by Ryoko Nakano in
Current site
Google Scholar
View More View Less
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


Two-thirds of the global child population lives in countries affected by violent and high-intensity conflict. International humanitarian law provides broad protection for children in the event of armed conflict. However, as the 2017 report of the un Secretary-General on children and armed conflict stresses, the scale and severity of grave violations has increased. This paper addresses the central puzzle of why the existing legal and normative frameworks of child protection have achieved so little, in addressing the marginalisation and disempowerment of children in armed conflict. We argue that the contemporary application of r2p in protecting children will be limited unless at least two fundamental challenges are met: (a) taming power politics; and (b) squaring inherent contradictions between the global r2p norm and national and regional normative frameworks of child protection. We highlight the case of Japan to illustrate the limits of the contemporary application of r2p in protecting children.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 654 67 4
Full Text Views 298 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 125 22 3