Norm Contestation and Norm Adaptation: R2P’s Reframing over Time
In: Global Responsibility to ProtectSearch for other papers by Gregor P. Hofmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Kavitha Suthanthiraraj in
Current site
Google Scholar
This article seeks to shed light on the question of how ‘meanings’ of an international norm adapt to norm contestation and asks whether and how R2P is being adapted to contestation. We contend that the reframing of an existing international norm by norm proponents in order to adapt it to dynamics of norm contestation have not been discussed adequately in the literature to date. Constructivist research on norm contestation could benefit from taking into account concepts in the new institutionalist literature. By combining the institutionalist concepts of ‘borrowing’ and ‘sharing’ with the literature on norm entrepreneurs and their framing-attempts in norm diffusion processes, we conjecture that an expansion in contestation increases the likeliness of the adaptation of the norm in question along the line of the contested issues. We aim to trace this adaptation by analysing the dynamics of R2P’s change in meaning and focus in its process of implementation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1690 | 289 | 38 |
| Full Text Views | 310 | 37 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 482 | 81 | 7 |
Norm Contestation and Norm Adaptation: R2P’s Reframing over Time
In: Global Responsibility to ProtectSearch for other papers by Gregor P. Hofmann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kavitha Suthanthiraraj in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
This article seeks to shed light on the question of how ‘meanings’ of an international norm adapt to norm contestation and asks whether and how R2P is being adapted to contestation. We contend that the reframing of an existing international norm by norm proponents in order to adapt it to dynamics of norm contestation have not been discussed adequately in the literature to date. Constructivist research on norm contestation could benefit from taking into account concepts in the new institutionalist literature. By combining the institutionalist concepts of ‘borrowing’ and ‘sharing’ with the literature on norm entrepreneurs and their framing-attempts in norm diffusion processes, we conjecture that an expansion in contestation increases the likeliness of the adaptation of the norm in question along the line of the contested issues. We aim to trace this adaptation by analysing the dynamics of R2P’s change in meaning and focus in its process of implementation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1690 | 289 | 38 |
| Full Text Views | 310 | 37 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 482 | 81 | 7 |
