Save

The Responsibility Not to Veto Revisited under the Theory of ‘Consequential Jus Cogens’

In: Global Responsibility to Protect
Author:
Rana M. Essawy Faculty of Law, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt dr.rana.mostafa.law@alexu.edu.eg

Search for other papers by Rana M. Essawy in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

In this article, I argue that contemporary international law imposes an obligation upon the UN Security Council permanent members to refrain from using their veto repeatedly in ways that impede the Council from acting against violations of peremptory norms. This obligation not to veto emanates from the duty to cooperate to end violations of peremptory norms as enshrined in Article 41(1) of the International Law Commission Articles on State Responsibility. For this purpose, I demonstrate that the duty to cooperate itself possesses a peremptory character under the theory of ‘consequential jus cogens’, whereby effects of jus cogens norms are themselves peremptory. In doing so, this article contributes to the ongoing debates concerning the legal nature of the effects of jus cogens norms by showing that the theory of ‘consequential jus cogens’ is an application of the generally accepted maxim accessorium sequitur principale and thus forms part of positive international law.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1604 316 46
Full Text Views 237 41 0
PDF Views & Downloads 537 102 1