Save

Mass Atrocities in Ethiopia and Myanmar: The Case for ‘Harm Mitigation’ in R2P Implementation

In: Global Responsibility to Protect
Authors:
Patrick Wight Lecturer, International Development Studies, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Senior Editor, Ethiopia Insight, patrick.wight@mcgill.ca

Search for other papers by Patrick Wight in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Yuriko Cowper-Smith Research and Engagement Officer, The Sentinel Project for Genocide Prevention, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, yuriko.cowpersmith@gmail.com

Search for other papers by Yuriko Cowper-Smith in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

By combining insights from the three dominant perspectives in International Relations – liberalism, realism, and anti-imperialism – a novel approach is put forward, that of ‘harm mitigation’. A comparative analysis of Ethiopia and Myanmar reveals that the international community still does not possess the mechanisms to halt mass atrocities in real time. When enforcing R2P, none of the available non-coercive and coercive policy options are pragmatically or ethically unassailable. The non-coercive tools that can be labelled as ‘ethical’, such as diplomacy, humanitarian assistance, and documenting atrocities, while important, are largely ineffective at stopping atrocities as they happen. Much like UN peacekeeping, these non-coercive actions are limited by targeted governments invoking the principle of state sovereignty. Meanwhile, actions that are potentially expedient, such as economic sanctions, military intervention, and supporting rebel groups, are ethically thorny. The conclusions speak to the reality that both non-intervention and intervention have the potential to cause human suffering.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1359 365 31
Full Text Views 192 94 4
PDF Views & Downloads 395 174 10