Protecting Civilians from Mass Atrocities: Meeting the Challenge of R2P Rejectionism

in Global Responsibility to Protect
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The three broad challenges that obstruct R2P’s implementation are conceptual, institutional, and political. Most scholarly work on R2P deals with the conceptual or institutional obstacles, paying insufficient attention to the political process. In this paper I analyse the motivations behind country opposition to the responsibility to protect and make recommendations to address the drivers of R2P rejectionism. A mix of underlying variables feeds this opposition, in particular experiences with state repression, mass atrocities and external interference, tactical maneuvers by UN delegations, and state revisionism. The political context for R2P implementation is not ‘a given’, but to some extent susceptible to external influence. In order to move R2P from an aspiration into an accepted norm, advocates with significant political leverage could undermine R2P opposition where possible. Neutralising rejectionism is key to obtain a stronger consensus resolution, move R2P into the normative mainstream, and increase the pressure to formulate rapid and robust responses to imminent or ongoing atrocities.

Protecting Civilians from Mass Atrocities: Meeting the Challenge of R2P Rejectionism

in Global Responsibility to Protect

Sections

References

2

Gareth EvansThe Responsibility to Protect Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and For All (Washington DC: Brookings Press2008) p. 54.

5

Matteo Legrenzi‘R2P is a No-Go’Ottawa Citizen14 April 2009. Statement from Miguel D’Escoto Brockmann at the 97th Meeting of the Sixty-Third General Assembly 23 July 2009 http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs//2009/ga10847.doc.htm.

13

A/63/PV.101 28 July 2009p. 11; Statement delivered by Lam Akol Ajawin Sudanese Foreign Minister at the UN General Assembly New York 28 July 2009.

14

SC/10187/Rev.1 26 February 2011.

19

GA/AB/3980 23 December 2010.

34

Patrick M. ReganCivil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict (Michigan: The University of Michigan Press2000) p. 5.

42

Alex J. BellamyResponsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities (Cambridge: Polity Press2009) pp. 87-88.

43

Ekkehard StraussThe Emperor’s New Clothes. The United Nations and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos2009) p. 12.

44

BellamyResponsibility to Protect88.

45

Randall L. Schweller‘Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back in’International Security 19/1: 72-107 (1994).

47

Schweller‘Bandwagoning’ p. 100.

48

StraussThe Emperor’s New Clothes p. 45.

49

Schweller‘Bandwagoning’ p. 93.

50

Daniel Freifeld‘Tapped Out’Foreign Policy18 March 2010; Tony Halpin and Alexi Mostrow ‘Russia ratchets up US tensions with Arm Sales to Iran and Venezuela’ The Times 19 September 2008; Loro Horta ‘China on the March in Latin America’ The Asia Times June 28 2007; ‘Venezuela’s Foreign Policy in the Hugo Chavez Era: Bolivarian Integration Multipolarity’ Conference Paper Presented at annual meeting of the ISA’s 49th Annual Convention Bridging Multiple Divides Hilton San Fransisco San Fransisco California USA 26 March 2008.

53

Applegarth and Block‘Acting Against Atrocities’ p. 28.

54

Regan‘Civil Wars’ p. 42.

55

Donald Steinberg‘Responsibility to Protect: Coming of Age’Global Responsibility to Protect 1: 432-441 (2010) p. 437.

56

Applegarth and Block‘Acting Against Atrocities’ p. 30.

59

Hitoshi Nasu‘Operationalizing the ‘Responsibility to Protect’ and Conflict Prevention: Dilemmas of Civilian Protection in Armed Conflict’Journal of Conflict and Security Law 1/0: 1-33 (2009) p. 30.

60

Evans‘The Responsibility to Protect’ p. 229.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 46 46 17
Full Text Views 83 83 61
PDF Downloads 14 14 3
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0