The Responsibility to Record Civilian Casualties

in Global Responsibility to Protect
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The responsibility to record civilian casualties in both armed conflict and civil disturbances must be an integral element of the responsibility to protect, particularly in the application of the just cause principles. The first part of this article examines the threshold issue of the possibility of large-scale civilian casualties which triggers the international community’s responsibility to react. The reports recommending the responsibility to protect emphasise the need to establish the actuality or risk of ‘large scale’ loss of life which is not possible in the current context without a civilian casualty recording structure. The second part of the article outlines the international legal obligation to record civilian casualties based on international humanitarian law and international human rights law. Thirdly, the responsibility to protect and the legal obligation to record casualties are brought together within the framework of Ban Ki-moon’s reports on implementation of the Responsibility to Protect. The fourth and final part of the article reviews the situations in Sri Lanka and Syria. Both states represent egregious examples of governments hiding the existence of casualties, resulting in paralysis within the international community. These situations establish, beyond doubt, that the national obligation to record civilian casualties must be part and parcel of the responsibility to protect.

The Responsibility to Record Civilian Casualties

in Global Responsibility to Protect




Gareth EvansThe Responsibility to Protect (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press2008) Chapter One A. Bellamy Responsibility to Protect (Cambridge: Polity Press 2009) Chapter 1.


ICISSThe Responsibility to Protect p. 32.


ICISSThe Responsibility to Protect p. 35.


Additional Protocol I of 1977Article 32.


Additional Protocol II of 1977Article 8.


William Abresch‘A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict’ European Journal of International Law16: 741-767 (2005) p. 762


A/RES/ 60/147 16 December 2005.


Amnesty International (2008) Report Sri Lanka accessed 2 October 2011.


A/HRC/RES/S-16/1 4 May 2011.


. S/PRST/2011/16 3 August 2011.


Joshua S. GoldsteinWinning the War on War (Hialeah, Fl.: Dutton Press2011) p. 230 see the section entitled ‘Counting is the First Step in Changing’ in which Goldstein argues that ‘Counting things – measuring data collection data analysis – can be a form of activism.’


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 58 58 20
Full Text Views 79 79 46
PDF Downloads 11 11 2
EPUB Downloads 2 2 0