Save

The Normative Status of the Responsibility to Protect after Libya*

In: Global Responsibility to Protect
Author:
Marie-Eve Loiselle Australian National University, marie-eve.loiselle@anu.edu.au

Search for other papers by Marie-Eve Loiselle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The responsibility to protect concept has evolved rapidly in the last decade but its normative and legal status is still disputed. This paper assesses the degree of recognition the concept has attracted since its inception and the significance of resolutions 1970 and 1973 for the transformation of the responsibility to protect into a new norm of customary international law. It argues that despite claims about the centrality of the concept in the decision to intervene in Libya, the language of both resolutions, and the statements made by members of the Security Council surrounding their adoption, indicate that member states did not consider that they were legally bound to protect the population of Libya. Consequently, the intervention in Libya has not promoted the development of a legal obligation upon the international community to protect the world’s populations against gross violations of human rights.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 671 73 5
Full Text Views 458 38 1
PDF Views & Downloads 448 83 3