African Regionalism & Human Protection Norms: An Overview

in Global Responsibility to Protect
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


Growing international solidarity for protection principles has formed the backdrop for an evolving notion of human protection at the un in the post-Cold War era. The emergence of the ‘Human Rights up Front’ initiative, protection of children and Women, Peace and Security policy agendas, and normative frameworks such as the protection of civilians and the Responsibility to Protect are indicative of a tangible human protection agenda at the un. However, the extent to which human protection norms have diffused in different regions vary in important ways. Africa – one region or many – has been a norm maker, shaper and taker, as well as a major recipient of action in accordance with this nascent normative regime. This article provides an overview of regionalism in Africa and examines how perspectives and institutional expressions at the regional level(s) have been influenced by – and in turn influenced – the uptake and development of norms around human protection.

African Regionalism & Human Protection Norms: An Overview

in Global Responsibility to Protect




Andrew Hurrell‘One World? Many Worlds? The Place of Regions in the Study of International Society’International Affairs83/1: 127–46 (2007).


Alexander WendtSocial Theory and International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press1999).


Hedley BullThe Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press1977) pp. 9–13.


Ian ClarkLegitimacy in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press2005) p. 6; Tim Dunne ‘The New Agenda’ in Alex J. Bellamy (ed.) International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004) p. 66.


Tim DunneInventing International Society: A History of the English School (London: Macmillan1998). For discussion of solidarist and pluralist conceptions of regionalism refer to article in this issue by Noel Morada.


Hettne and Söderbaum‘Theorising the Rise of Regionness’ pp. 457–8.


Amitav Acharya‘The Emerging Regional Architecture of World Politics’World Politics59/4: 629–652 (2007).


Ian Taylor‘Globalization and Regionalization in Africa: Reactions to Attempts at Neo-Liberal Regionalism’Review of International Political Economy10/2: 310–330 (2003) p. 327.


Abdul Karim BanguraToyin Falola and African Epistemologies (London: Palgrave Macmillan2015).


Ian Taylor‘Globalization and Regionalization in Africa: Reactions to Attempts at ­Neo-Liberal Regionalism’Review of International Political Economy10/2: 310–30 (2003).


Jeffrey T. Checkel‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’World ­Politics 50/2: 324–48 (1998). See for example: Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’ International Organization 52/4: 887–917 (1998).


 See: Amitav Acharya‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’International Organization58/2: 239–75 (2004); Amitav Acharya Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (Ithaca: Cornell University Press 2009).


Charlotte Epstein‘Stop Telling Us How to Behave: Socialization or Infantilization?’­International Studies Perspectives13/2: 135–45 (2012).


Paul W. Williams‘The “Responsibility to Protect”, Norm Localisation, and African International Society’Global Responsibility to Protect 1/3: 392–416 (2009) p. 398.


Amitav Acharya‘The r2p and Norm Diffusion: Towards A Framework of Norm ­Circulation’Global Responsibility to Protect5/4: 466–479 (2013).


Antje WienerA Theory of Contestation (Heidelberg: Springer2014).


Jennifer Welsh‘Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect’Global Responsibility to Protect5/4: 365–396 (2013). See also: Michael Barnett and Thomas G. Weiss Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread (London: Routledge 2011) pp. 8–34.


Baffour Ankomah‘African Union: From Non-Interference to Non-Indifference’New ­Africanno. 460 (2007) pp. 10–12.


Dersso‘The Role of the African Human Rights System in the Operationalisation of ­Article 4(H).’ pp. 195–206.


Dembinski and Schott‘Converging around Global Norms?’ pp. 276–96.


Originally created in 2002. See for example: Angela Meyer ‘Peace and Security Cooperation in Central Africa: Challenges and Prospects’ Discussion Paper 56 (Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitutet 2011). See also:


Paul D. Williams‘From non-intervention to non-indifference: the origins and development of the African Union's security culture’ African Affairs 106/423: 253–279 (2007); Williams ‘The “Responsibility to Protect” Norm Localisation and African International Society’ pp. 392–416.


Murithi‘The Role of the African Peace and Security Architecture in the Implementation of Article 4(H).’ pp. 147–149.


Williams‘The “Responsibility to Protect” Norm Localisation and African International Society’ p. 398 citing Williams ‘From Non-Intervention to Non-Indifference’ pp. 256–262.


M. L. Krook and J. True‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’European Journal of International Relations 18: 103–27 (2012).


W. Sandholtz‘Dynamics of International Norm Change: Rules against Wartime Plunder’European Journal of International Relations14: 101–31 (2008).


 See: Charles T. Hunt‘Emerging Powers and the Responsibility to Protect: Non-linear Norm Dynamics in Complex International Society’Cambridge Review of International ­Affairs (Forthcoming).

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 43 43 17
Full Text Views 42 42 14
PDF Downloads 12 12 8
EPUB Downloads 15 15 4