Counting forced migrants runs into a number of hurdles related to their classification, to their experience of flight, and to the need to use myriad sources of data from governments, international organisations, and non-governmental organisations. To complicate matters, three organisations have mandates to count different groups – the un Relief Works Agency (unrwa) for Palestine refugees, the un High Commission for Refugees (unhcr) for refugees more generally, and the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (idmc) for internally displaced persons (idps). All three face a range of common challenges in carrying out this vital aspect of their respective mandates. These include conceptual challenges, political concerns, competing interests and access. They also face their own political and institutional challenges, leading to individualised approaches and variance across and even within the organisations. In spite of these complexities, there have been significant improvements in the reliability of data and new technologies and registration methods are providing a way forward to a better understanding of forced migrant movements.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Susanne Schmeidl, “Exploring the Causes of Forced Migration: A Pooled Time-Series Analysis, 1971–1990,” Social Science Quarterly 78, no. 2 (1997): 152.
Walter Kälin, “The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and the Search for a Universal Framework of Protection for Internally Displaced Persons” in Research Handbook on International Law and Migration, ed. Vincent Chetail and Celine Bauloz (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2014).
Aninia Nadig, “Forced Migration and Global Processes-Report of the Eighth Conference of the International Association for the Study of Forced Migration, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 5–9 January 2003,” Journal of Refugee Studies 16 (2003): 361.
Jerzy Sztucki, “Who Is a Refugee? The Convention Definition: Universal or Obsolete?,” in Refugee Rights and Realities: Evolving International Concepts and Regimes, ed. Frances Nicholson and Patrick M. Twomey (Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1999), 58.
Susan F. Martin, “Gender and the Evolving Refugee Regime,” Refugee Survey Quarterly 29, no. 2 (2010).
Goodwin-Gill and McAdam, The Refugee in International Law, 301; Brian Gorlick, “The Convention and the Committee against Torture: A Complementary Protection Regime for Refugees,” International Journal of Refugee Law 11, no. 3 (1999): 481–82.
Liza Schuster, The Use and Abuse of Political Asylum in Britain and Germany (London: Frank Cass, 2003), 161.
Arboleda, “Refugee Definition in Africa and Latin America: The Lessons of Pragmatism,” 187.
Allehone Mulugeta Abebe, “The African Union Convention on Internally Displaced Persons: Its Codification Background, Scope, and Enforcement Challenges,” Refugee Survey Quarterly 29 (2010): 42.
Walter Kälin, “The Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement as International Minimum Standard and Protection Tool,” Refugee Survey Quarterly 24 (2005): 29–30.
Chris de Wet, “Spatial- and Complexity-based Perspective on the Ethics of Development-induced Displacement and Resettlement,” in Development-induced Displacement and Resettlement: New Perspectives on Persisting Problems, ed. Irge Satiroglu and Narae Choi. (New York: Routledge, 2015), 86.
Peter Vandergeest, “Land to some tillers: development-induced displacement in Laos,” International Social Science Journal, 55 (2003): 47.
Nils Geissler, “The International Protection of Internally Displaced Persons,” International Journal of Refugee Law 11, no. 3 (1999): 456.
Mick Dumper, “Future Prospects for the Palestinian Refugees,” Refugee Survey Quarterly, 2–3 (2009): 563–6.
Oliver Bakewell, “Research Beyond the Categories: The Importance of Policy Irrelevant Research into Forced Migration,” Journal of Refugee Studies 21, no. 4 (2008): 441.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 455 | 60 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 238 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 8 | 0 |
Counting forced migrants runs into a number of hurdles related to their classification, to their experience of flight, and to the need to use myriad sources of data from governments, international organisations, and non-governmental organisations. To complicate matters, three organisations have mandates to count different groups – the un Relief Works Agency (unrwa) for Palestine refugees, the un High Commission for Refugees (unhcr) for refugees more generally, and the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre (idmc) for internally displaced persons (idps). All three face a range of common challenges in carrying out this vital aspect of their respective mandates. These include conceptual challenges, political concerns, competing interests and access. They also face their own political and institutional challenges, leading to individualised approaches and variance across and even within the organisations. In spite of these complexities, there have been significant improvements in the reliability of data and new technologies and registration methods are providing a way forward to a better understanding of forced migrant movements.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 455 | 60 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 238 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 8 | 0 |