The Arms Trade Treaty: Responsibility to Protect in Action?

in Global Responsibility to Protect
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This paper argues that the influence of R2P can be seen in many subtle, yet significant, ways throughout the Arms Trade Treaty, from the language used to the obligations imposed on States Parties. The Arms Trade Treaty indicates that R2P is influencing decision making and contributing to the protection of populations from atrocity crimes by obliging States Parties to explicitly consider the consequences of their arms transfers. In addition, the Arms Trade Treaty has increased our understanding of R2P by confirming that R2P involves a range of measures and includes restraint by States in refusing to transfer arms in situations where atrocity crimes are being committed, which may temper concerns about R2P being rebranded as assistance.

The Arms Trade Treaty: Responsibility to Protect in Action?

in Global Responsibility to Protect

Sections

References

6

Nina H.B. Jørgensen‘State Responsibility for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’American Journal of International Law 108: 722–749 (2014); Clare da Silva ‘Framework and Core Standards of an Arms Trade Treaty’ asil Proceedings 2009 103: 336–338 (2009) p. p. 338.

13

Denise Garcia‘Global Norms on Arms: The Significance of the Arms Trade Treaty for Global Security in World Politics’Global Policy5/4: 425–432 (2014) p. 425.

15

Laurence Lustgarten‘The Arms Trade Treaty: Achievements, Failings, Future’International and Comparative Law Quarterly64/3: 569–600 (2015) p. 570.

17

Ernie Regehr‘An International Code of Conduct for Arms Transfers’Ploughshares Monitor18/2 (1997) http://ploughshares.ca/pl_publications/an-international-code-of-conduct-on-arms-transfers/ accessed 20 July 2016; Sarah Parker Implications of States’ Views on an Arms Trade Treaty (unidir Jan 2008) p. 5; Hunter ‘Time to Reload’ p. 234.

18

Hunter‘Time to Reload’ p. 234; Regehr ‘An International Code of Conduct for Arms Transfers’.

22

Ray Acheson‘Starting somewhere: The arms trade treaty, human rights and gender based violence’Human Rights Discourse22/2: 17–19 (2013) p. 17; A/res/61/89 6 December 2006; Knut Dőrmann and Louise Arimatsu ‘International Law Summary: Adoption of a Global Arms Trade Treaty: Challenges Ahead’ 2013 http://www.chathamhouse.org accessed 20 July 2016 p. 2; Adam Arthur-Biggs ‘Lawmakers Guns & Money: How the Proposed Arms Trade Treaty can Target Armed Violence by Reducing Small Arms & Light Weapons Transfers to Non-State Groups’ Creighton Law Review 44/4: 1311–1355 (2011).

27

Dőrmann and Arimatsu‘International Law Summary’ p. 2.

30

Mexico (2012) Joint Statement on the Last Day of the Arms Trade Treaty; http://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/att/negotiating-conference/statements/27July_jointstatement.pdf; accessed 20 July 2016.

38

Rachel Van Landingham‘Politics or Law? The Dual Nature of the Responsibility to Protect’Denver Journal of International Law and Policy41/1: 63–86 (2012) p. 77; Global Centre for the Responsibility to Protect Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: The 2009 General Assembly Debate: An Assessment 2009 available at www://globalr2p.org/media/pdf/GCR2P_General_Assembly_Debate_Assessment.pdf accessed 20 July 2016 p. 2.

54

Jayantha Dhanapala‘Multilateral Cooperation on Small Arms and Light Weapons: From Crisis to Collective Response’Brown Journal of World Affairs9/1: 163–171 (2002) p. 163.

55

Rachel Stohl‘Targeting Children: Small Arms and Children in Conflict’Brown Journal of World Affairs9/1: 281–292 (2002) p. 281; Rachel Stohl ‘Under the Gun: Children and small arms’ African Security Review 11/3: 17–25 (2002) p. 18.

59

Dörmann and Arimatsu‘International Law Summary’ p. 4.

62

Fukui‘The Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 14; Stuart Maslen Commentaries on Arms Control Treaties: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use Stockpiling Production and Transfer of Anti-personnel Mines and on Their Destruction (Oxford University Press 2004) p. 128.

71

Jørgensen‘State Responsibilities for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 725.

73

Barry Kellman‘Controlling the Arms Trade: One Important Stride for Humankind’Fordham Journal of International Law37: 687–731 (2014) p. 711.

79

Anna Stavrianakis‘Legitimising liberal militarism: politics, law and war in the Arms Trade Treaty’Third World Quarterly (2016) doi:10.1080/0146597.2015.1113867 p. 9.

81

Dörmann and Arimatsu‘International Law Summary’ p. 5; Stavrianakis Xinyu and Bin­xin ‘Arms and the responsibility to protect’ p. 11.

83

Glenn McDonald‘Worth the Paper? The Arms Trade Treaty’E-International Relationshttp://www.e-ir.info/2013/04/17/worth-the-paper-the-arms-trade-treaty/ accessed 25 November 2014.

87

Jørgensen‘State Responsibilities for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 728.

88

Kellman‘Controlling the Arms Trade’ p. 714.

95

Helena Whall and Allison Pytlak‘The Role of Civil Society in the International Negotiations on the Arms Trade Treaty’Global Policy5/4: 453–468 (2014) p. 458.

96

Jørgensen‘State Responsibilities for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 726.

100

Jørgensen‘State Responsibilities for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 730.

102

Clare da Silva‘Framework and Core Standards of an Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 338.

106

Jørgensen‘State Responsibilities for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 729.

109

Maya Brehm‘The Arms Trade and States’ Duty to Ensure Respect for Humanitarian and Human Rights Law’Journal of Conflict & Security Law12/3: 359–387 (2008) p. 385.

110

Jørgensen‘State Responsibilities for Aiding or Assisting International Crimes in the Context of the Arms Trade Treaty’ p. 747.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 46 46 15
Full Text Views 171 171 68
PDF Downloads 12 12 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0