Save

The Debate on logos and diastēma in Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics*

In: Greek and Roman Musical Studies
Author: Massimo Raffa1
View More View Less
  • 1 Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici – Università della CalabriaVia Pietro Bucci Cubo 28/B87036 Arcavacata di Rende (CS)Italym.raffa72@gmail.com
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

Introducing his commentary on Ptol. Harm. I.5, Porphyry discusses at length the vocabulary of musical intervals and in particular the question whether the words λόγος and διάστηµα should or not be used as synonyms. This paper aims, on the one hand, at analysing the way in which he chooses and arranges his sources; on the other hand, at restoring them to the original debate to which they belong—a debate in which a seminal role seems to have been played by Plato’s Timaeus and the contributions of its early commentators (Eratosthenes, Aelianus, Panaetius) in the framework of post-Aristoxenian harmonics.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 170 36 4
Full Text Views 128 4 1
PDF Views & Downloads 30 9 3