The Debate on logos and diastēma in Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics*
In: Greek and Roman Musical StudiesSearch for other papers by Massimo Raffa in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Introducing his commentary on Ptol. Harm. I.5, Porphyry discusses at length the vocabulary of musical intervals and in particular the question whether the words λόγος and διάστηµα should or not be used as synonyms. This paper aims, on the one hand, at analysing the way in which he chooses and arranges his sources; on the other hand, at restoring them to the original debate to which they belong—a debate in which a seminal role seems to have been played by Plato’s Timaeus and the contributions of its early commentators (Eratosthenes, Aelianus, Panaetius) in the framework of post-Aristoxenian harmonics.
Nell’introdurre il suo commento a Ptol. Harm. I.5, Porfirio tratta a lungo del lessico degli intervalli musicali e in particolare della questione se le parole λόγος e διάστηµα si possano o meno utilizzare come sinonimi. Lo studio si propone da una parte di analizzare il modo in cui Porfirio sceglie e dispone le sue fonti, e dall’altra parte di collocare tali fonti nel loro contesto originale, che sembra essere un dibattito in cui un ruolo fondamentale dovette esser giocato dal Timeo di Platone e dai suoi primi commentatori (Eratostene, Eliano, Panezio) nel quadro della teoria armonica post-aristossenica.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Alexanderson B. Textual Remarks on Ptolemy’s Harmonica and Porphyry’s Commentary 1969 Göteborg
-
Barker A. Greek Musical Writings Harmonic and Acoustic Theory 1989 vol. II Cambridge
-
Barker A. Scientific Method in Ptolemy’s Harmonics 2000 Cambridge
-
Barker A. The Science of Harmonics in Classical Greece 2007 Cambridge
-
Barker A. Contributions of the ‘Aristoxenians’ to Harmonics according to Ptolemy and Porphyry International Workshop on Porphyry’s Commentary on the Harmonics of Claudius Ptolemy 2011 Humboldt-Universität Berlin (unpublished)
-
Bidez J. & Cumont F. Les mages hellénisées. Zoroastre, Ostanès et Hystaspe de’après la tradition grecque 1938 Paris (repr. 1973)
-
Creese D. The Monochord in Ancient Greek Harmonic Science 2010 Cambridge
-
Düring I. Porphyrios Kommentar zur Harmonielehre des Ptolemaios 1932 Gothenburg (repr. Hildesheim 1987)
-
Düring I. Ptolemaios und Porphyrios über die Musik 1934 Gothenburg (repr. Hildesheim 1987)
-
Flamand J.-M. Diodoros d’Erétrie (D 130) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques 1994 vol. II Paris 784 785
-
Goulet R. Ailianos le platonicien (A 60) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques 1989 vol. II Paris 78
-
Hiller E. Der Πλατωνικός des Eratosthenes Philologus 1870 30 60 72
-
Holstenius L. De Vita & Scriptis Porphyrii Philosophi Dissertatio 1655 Cambridge
-
Huffman C.A. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. A Commentary on the Fragments and Testimonia with Interpretive Essays 1993 Cambridge
-
Huffman C.A. Archytas of Tarentum. Pythagorean, Philosopher and Mathematician King 2005 Cambridge
-
Maraval P. & Goulet R. Démétrios le géomètre (D 61) Dictionnaire des Philosophes Antiques 1994 vol. II Paris 641 642 1994
-
Meriani A. Teoria musicale e antiempirismo nella Repubblica di Platone Sulla musica greca antica. Studi e ricerche 2003 Naples 83 119
-
Pelosi F. Plato on Music, Soul and Body 2010 Cambridge
-
Riethmüller A. Logos und Diastema in der Griechischen Musiktheorie Archiv für Musikwissenschaft 1985 42 18 36
-
Rocconi E. Le parole delle Muse. La formazione del lessico tecnico musicale nella Grecia antica 2003 Rome
-
Ruelle Ch.-E. Rapports sur une mission littéraire et philologique en Espagne Archives des mission scientifiques et littéraires 1875 III 2 497 627
-
Scherer C. De Aelio Dionysio musico qui vocatur 1886 Bonn
-
Schönberger P.L. Studien zum 1. Buch der Harmonik des Claudius Ptolemäus. Ein Beitrag zur griechischen Ton- und Musiklehre 1914 Augsburg (repr. Lexington 2012)
-
Sodano A.R. Porphyrii in Platonis Timeaum Commentariorum Fragmenta 1964 Naples
-
Solmsen F. Eratosthenes as Platonist and Poet TAPA 1942 73 192 213
-
Tarrant H. Thrasyllan Platonism 1993 Ithaca/London
-
Wifstrand A. Eikota. Emendationen und Interpretationen zu Griechischen Prosaikern der Kaiserzeit 1934 vol. III Lund
-
3
See e.g. Rocconi 2003, 75-7. For conceptual aspects of the difference between these two denominations, see the classic article of Riethmüller 1985.
-
4
Düring 1932, app. ad loc.
-
6
See Hiller 1870, 68; Solmsen 1942, 194, 197-8.
-
8
See Barker 1989, 345 n. 112, 346 n. 117, 347 n. 122, 349 n. 125; Creese 2010, 178-209.
-
16
Bidez-Cumont 1938: II, 64, n. 1.
-
30
See Pelosi 2010, 192, n. 68.
-
31
Barker 2007, 320.
-
32
Cf. Barker 2007, 23-5; Meriani 2003.
-
33
See Barker in Huffman 2005, 181.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 410 | 106 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 146 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 11 | 0 |
The Debate on logos and diastēma in Porphyry’s Commentary on Ptolemy’s Harmonics*
In: Greek and Roman Musical StudiesSearch for other papers by Massimo Raffa in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Introducing his commentary on Ptol. Harm. I.5, Porphyry discusses at length the vocabulary of musical intervals and in particular the question whether the words λόγος and διάστηµα should or not be used as synonyms. This paper aims, on the one hand, at analysing the way in which he chooses and arranges his sources; on the other hand, at restoring them to the original debate to which they belong—a debate in which a seminal role seems to have been played by Plato’s Timaeus and the contributions of its early commentators (Eratosthenes, Aelianus, Panaetius) in the framework of post-Aristoxenian harmonics.
Nell’introdurre il suo commento a Ptol. Harm. I.5, Porfirio tratta a lungo del lessico degli intervalli musicali e in particolare della questione se le parole λόγος e διάστηµα si possano o meno utilizzare come sinonimi. Lo studio si propone da una parte di analizzare il modo in cui Porfirio sceglie e dispone le sue fonti, e dall’altra parte di collocare tali fonti nel loro contesto originale, che sembra essere un dibattito in cui un ruolo fondamentale dovette esser giocato dal Timeo di Platone e dai suoi primi commentatori (Eratostene, Eliano, Panezio) nel quadro della teoria armonica post-aristossenica.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 410 | 106 | 3 |
| Full Text Views | 146 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 11 | 0 |
