What we own Before Property: Hugo Grotius and the Suum

in Grotiana
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


At the basis of modern natural law theories, the concept of the suum, i.e. what belongs to the person (in Latin, his, her, its, their own), has received little scholarly attention despite its importance both in explaining and justifying not only the genealogy of property, but also that of morality and war. In this essay I focus on Grotius’s account of the suum and examine what it is, what things it includes, what rights it gives rise to, and how it is extended in the transition from the state of nature to civil society. I then briefly suggest that reviving this concept could help to illuminate the current discussion on the foundations of basic human rights, and to re-evaluate cases where these seem to clash with property rights.

What we own Before Property: Hugo Grotius and the Suum

in Grotiana




Wesley Newcomb Hohfeld‘Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning’The Yale Law Journal23 (1913) 16–59at pp. 32–33. Although Hohfeld applied this division to legal rights only I join those who think that it may also be fruitfully applied to the moral realm.


Mautner‘Introduction of Olivecrona’ p. 206. Mautner mentions van der Muelen’s comments to Rights where the latter says that the right to these things is ‘as it were in our very bones’: Ibid.


Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 26 26 12
Full Text Views 87 87 62
PDF Downloads 5 5 1
EPUB Downloads 2 2 0