Save

Grotius, Informal Empire and the Conclusion of Unequal Treaties

In: Grotiana
Author:
Inge Van Hulle Department for Public Law, Encyclopaedia and Legal History, Tilburg University, I.VanHulle@uvt.nl

Search for other papers by Inge Van Hulle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Unequal treaties have become synonymous with the imperial practice of Western states in East Asia during the nineteenth century. They have also become a popular subject of study for historians of international law. A neglected feature of the history of unequal treaties is the way they were used and theorised upon as instruments of informal empire before the nineteenth century, in the early-modern age. Hugo Grotius in particular wrote extensively on unequal treaties and alliances through his familiarity with the Dutch East India Company’s exploits in the East Indies, where the conclusion of treaties with indigenous rulers formed the cornerstone of Dutch imperialism. This article delves into the early-modern roots of unequal alliances and discusses how the Grotian analysis of unequal alliances influenced other authors of the classic law of nations.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1036 247 9
Full Text Views 403 12 0
PDF Views & Downloads 353 33 0