The Source of Grotius’s ‘Etiamsi Daremus … Deus Non Esse’
In: GrotianaSearch for other papers by Rudolf Schuessler in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
The immediate source of Grotius’s etiamsi-claim (natural law would be valid even if there were no God or human affairs were no concern for him) has never been convincingly identified. This paper argues that Grotius’s formulation of the claim derives from a very similar sentence of Bartolomé de Medina (1527–1580), a Spanish scholastic and eminent member of the School of Salamanca, whose work Grotius quotes in De iure belli ac pacis. Medina ascribes the sentence to Seneca, but there is apparently no such proposition in Seneca’s extant works. Nevertheless, related propositions were attributed to Seneca in the medieval period, not least in sermons and pastoral writings, even in vernacular languages. This shows that, even outside academic debates, counterfactual reasoning involving God’s non-existence or indifference to human affairs was not considered illicit or dangerous in the Middle Ages.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abel, Stefan. Johannes Nider. ‘Die vierundzwanzig goldenen Harfen’ (Tübingen: Mohr, 2011).
-
Aquinas, Thomas. Expositio super Iob ad litteram. Opera Omnia, Vol.26, ed. by A. Dondaine (Rome: Ad Sanctae Sabinae, 1965).
-
Augustine. Epistulae (ep. 124–184A). Corpus Scriptorum Ecclesiasticorum Latinorum, Vol.44, ed. by A. Goldbacher (Vienna: Tempsky, 1904).
-
Bejczy, Istvan. The Cardinal Virtues in the Middle Ages (Leiden: Brill, 2011).
-
Besselink, Leonard. ‘The Impious Hypothesis Revisited’, Grotiana 9 (1988), 3–63.
-
Brambilla, Emilia. ‘Alle origini dell’enciclopedismo medioevale: Il ‘Liber de auctoritate divina’ e ‘Il liber deflorationum’ di Werner di Sankt Blasien’, Aevum 57 (1983), 245–81.
-
Crowe, M. ‘The Impious Hypothesis: A Paradox in H. Grotius?’, Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 38 (1976), 379–410.
-
Dinter, Martin. ‘Sententiae in Seneca’, in Seneca Philosophus, ed. by Jula Windberger and Marcia Colish (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2014), p. 319–41.
-
Gerald of Wales. Giraldi Cambrensi Opera, ed. by J. Brewer, J. Dimock and G. Warner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).
-
Gregorius Ariminensis [Gregory of Rimini]. Lectura super Primum et Secundum Sententiarum. Tomus 6 (dist. 24 –44), ed. by D. Trapp and V. Marcolino (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1980).
-
Grotius, Hugo. De Iure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres (Paris: Nicolas Buon, 1625).
-
Grotius, Hugo. De Iure Belli ac Pacis Libri Tres, ed. by B. de Kanter and Van Hettinga Tromp (Aalen: Scientia, 1993).
-
Grotius, Hugo. On the Law of War and Peace, ed. by Stephen Neff (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).
-
Guillelmus Alvernus [William of Auvergne]. Opera homiletica. Tom. 2, ed. by Franco Morenzoni (Turnhout: Brepols, 2011).
-
Hervada, Javier. ‘The Old and The New in the Hypothesis “Etiamsi daremus” of Grotius’, Grotiana 4 (1983), 4–20.
-
Leff, Gordon. Gregory of Rimini. Tradition and Innovation in 14th Century Thought (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1961).
-
Lesaffer, Randall and Janne Nijman, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Hugo Grotius (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021).
-
Lugo, Juan de. De peccatis (Collegium Romanum, 1633). Cop. Jacob Bach, Karlsruhe blb, Ms. em (= Kloster Ettenheim-Münster) 196, item 1, 64 f. https://digital.blb-karlsruhe.de/id/5276980.
-
Mandrella, Isabelle. ‘Die Autarkie des mittelalterlichen Naturrechts als Vernuftrecht. Gregor von Rimini und das etiamsi Deus non daretur-Argument’, in Herbst des Mittelalters?, ed. by Jan Aertsen and Martin Pickavé (Berlin: De Gruyter, 2004), p. 265–276.
-
Marcus Aurelius. Meditations, Books 1–6, ed. Christopher Gill (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).
-
Medina, Bartolomé de. Expositio in primam secundae angelici doctoris D. Thomae Aquinatis (Venice: Pietro Dehuchino, 1580).
-
Negro, Paola. ‘Un Topos in Hugo Grotius. Etsiamsi Daremus Non Esse Deum’, Grotiana 19 (1998), 3–23.
-
Nellen, Henk. Hugo Grotius: A Lifelong Struggle for Peace in Church and State (Leiden: Brill, 2014).
-
Nider, Johannes. Aurei Sermones (Esslingen: Konrad Fyner, 1476).
-
Oakley, Francis. ‘Secularism in Question: Hugo Grotius’s “Impious Hypothesis” Again’, in Medieval Foundations of International Relations, ed. by William Bain (London: Routledge, 2017), pp. 54–66.
-
Pseudo-Aquinas [William of Whatley]. De consolatione philosophiae (Nürnberg: Koberger, 1486).
-
Pufendorf, Samuel. De jure naturae et gentium. Gesammelte Werke. Band 4.1 (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1998).
-
Saint Leger, James. The ‚Etiamsi Daremus‘ of Hugo Grotius (Rome: Angelicum, 1962).
-
Sánchez Gómez, Julio. Bartolomé de Medina (Madrid: Fundación Ignacio Larramendi, 2019).
-
Schuessler, Rudolf. ‘Moral Legislation Behind a Veil of Ignorance: Cardinal Sforza Pallavicino (1607–1667) on the Procedure of Natural Law’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 61 (2023), 193–213.
-
Schuessler, Rudolf. ‘At the Cradle of Consequentialism: Scholastic Contributions 1630s–1650s’, Journal of Natural Law (forthcoming).
-
Seneca, Lucius Annaeus. De quatuor virtutibus liber (Cologne, 1472). archive.org/details/anneilucijsenece00mart/page/n5/mode/2up.
-
Suárez, Francisco. De legibus (ii1–12). De lege naturali, ed. by L. Pereña and V. Abril (Madrid: csic, 1974).
-
Suárez, Francisco. Selections from Three Works, ed. by T. Pink (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2014).
-
Vazquez, Gabriel. Commentarii et Disputationes in Primam Secundae S. Thomae. Tom. 1 (Venice: Deuchino, 1608).
-
Wernerus de Sancto Blasio. Liber deflorationum (Basle: Furter, 1494).
-
Williams, Ulla. ‘Schul der weisheit’, in: Überlieferungsgeschichtliche Editionen und Studien zur deutschen Literatur des Mittelalters, ed. by K. Kunze, J. Mayer, B. Schnell (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1989), pp. 391–424.
-
Zacharias Chrysopolitanus. In umum ex quatuor (Cologne: E. Cervicornus, 1535).
-
Ziegler, Caspar. In Hugonis Grotii De Iure Belli Ac Pacis Libros Notæ Et Animadversiones Subitariæ (Wittenberg: Mevius & Schumacher, 1666).
-
Zumel, Francisco. In primam secundae S. Thomae commentaria (Salamanca: J. Fernandez, 1594).
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 381 | 381 | 46 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 56 | 56 | 8 |
The Source of Grotius’s ‘Etiamsi Daremus … Deus Non Esse’
In: GrotianaSearch for other papers by Rudolf Schuessler in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
The immediate source of Grotius’s etiamsi-claim (natural law would be valid even if there were no God or human affairs were no concern for him) has never been convincingly identified. This paper argues that Grotius’s formulation of the claim derives from a very similar sentence of Bartolomé de Medina (1527–1580), a Spanish scholastic and eminent member of the School of Salamanca, whose work Grotius quotes in De iure belli ac pacis. Medina ascribes the sentence to Seneca, but there is apparently no such proposition in Seneca’s extant works. Nevertheless, related propositions were attributed to Seneca in the medieval period, not least in sermons and pastoral writings, even in vernacular languages. This shows that, even outside academic debates, counterfactual reasoning involving God’s non-existence or indifference to human affairs was not considered illicit or dangerous in the Middle Ages.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 381 | 381 | 46 |
| Full Text Views | 7 | 7 | 3 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 56 | 56 | 8 |
