This article presents three arguments about defects in imperialist feminism. First, I show that imperialist feminists engage in decontextualized comparisons: they consistently compare Western women to the Muslimwoman, without comparing Muslim men and women or comparing non-Muslim men and women. These inconsistent comparisons are the source of significant misrepresentations of Muslim women. Second, I propose that imperialist feminists view Muslim women through the heteronormative male gaze. That is, when imperialist feminists assess Muslim women’s practices, they implement the normative assumptions of heterosexual males in the West. Third, I argue that imperialist feminists incorrectly presume that Western women enjoy full autonomy or fail to recognize that women everywhere do not enjoy full autonomy. I present medieval Islamic legal ideas about a wife’s right to sexual fulfillment as evidence that the liberal myth of autonomy is not translatable to orthodox Islamic jurisprudence.
Cet article présente trois arguments sur les défauts du féminisme impérialiste. Premièrement, je montre que les féministes impérialistes s’engagent dans des comparaisons décontextualisées: elles comparent systématiquement les femmes occidentales à la femme musulmane supposée, sans comparer les hommes et les femmes musulmans ni les hommes et les femmes non musulmans. Ces comparaisons incohérentes sont la source d’importantes déclarations fausses au sujet de la femme musulmane. Deuxièmement, je suggère que les féministes impérialistes voient les femmes musulmanes à travers le regard masculin hétéronormé. En d’autres termes, lorsque les féministes impérialistes évaluent les pratiques des femmes musulmanes, elles appliquent les hypothèses normatives des hommes hétérosexuels en Occident. Troisièmement, je soutiens que les féministes impérialistes présument à tort que les femmes occidentales jouissent d’une autonomie totale ou ne reconnaissent pas que les femmes du monde entier ne jouissent pas d’une autonomie complète. Je présente les doctrines juridiques islamiques médiévales sur le droit de la femme à la pleine jouissance sexuelle comme preuve que le mythe libéral de l’autonomie n’est pas transportable dans la jurisprudence islamique orthodoxe.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Abou El Fadl, Khaled. Speaking in God’s Name: Islamic Law, Authority and Women. Oxford: Oneworld, 2001.
Abrams, Kathryn. “From Autonomy to Agency: Feminist Perspectives on Self-Direction.” William and Mary Law Review 40:3 (1998–1999): 805–846.
Abrams, Kathryn. “Sex Wars Redux: Agency and Coercion in Feminist Legal Theory.” Columbia Law Review 95:2 (1995): 304–376.
Abu-Lughod, Lila. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others.” American Anthropologist 104:3 (2002): 783–790.
Abu-Lughod, Lila. “Seductions of the ‘Honor Crime.’” differences 22:1 (2011): 17–63.
Ahmed, Leila. Women and Gender in Islam: Historical Roots of a Modern Debate. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.
Ahmed, Sara. The Promise of Happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2010.
Ahmed, Sara. Willful Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.
Ali, Kecia. Sexual Ethics and Islam: Feminist Reflections on Qur’an, Hadith, and Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld, 2006.
Anghie, Antony. “The Evolution of International Law: Colonial and Postcolonial Realities.” Third World Quarterly 27:5 (2006): 739–753.
Asad, Talal. “Ethnographic Representation, Statistics and Modern Power.” Social Research 61:1 (1994): 55–88.
Asad, Talal. “French Secularism and the ‘Islamic Veil Affair.” The Hedgehog Review (2006): 93–106.
Asad, Talal. Genealogies of Religion. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.
Aydin, Cemil. The Idea of the Muslim World: A Global Intellectual History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2017.
Banks, Ingrid. Hair Matters: Beauty, Power, and Black Women’s Consciousness. New York: New York University Press, 2000.
Bayoumi, Moustafa. “The God That Failed: The Neo-Orientalism of Today’s Muslim Commentators.” In This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror, 99–118. New York: New York University Press, 2015.
Bell, Kirsten. “Genital Cutting and Western Discourses on Sexuality.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 19:2 (2005): 125–148.
Benkheira, Mohammed Hocine. “L’impuissance sexuelle, motif légal de rupture du lien matrimonial.” Islamic Law and Society 21:1–2 (2014): 1–48.
Benkheira, Mohammed Hocine. “Jouir sans enfanter? Concubines, filiation et coït interrompu au debut de l’Islam.” Der Islam 90:2 (2013): 245–305.
Bennett, Theodore. “Beauty and the Beast: Analogising between Cosmetic Surgery and Female Genital Mutilation.” Flinders Law Journal 14:1 (2012): 49–68.
Berer, Marge. “Cosmetic Surgery, Body Image and Sexuality.” Reproductive Health Matters 18:35 (2010): 4–10.
Berger, John, Sven Blomberg, Chris Fox, Michael Dibb, and Richard Hollis. Ways of Seeing. London: BBC/Penguin Books, 1973.
Berkey, Jonathan P. “Circumcision Circumscribed: Female Excision and Cultural Accommodation in the Medieval Near East.” International Journal of Middle East Studies 28:1 (1996): 19–38.
Bevir, Mark. The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Bordo, Susan. “Braveheart, Babe, and the Contemporary Body.” In Enhancing Human Traits: Ethical and Social Implications, ed. Erik Parens, 189–221. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1997.
Bowen, Donna Lee. “Muslim Juridical Opinions concerning the Status of Women as Demonstrated by the Case of ʿazl.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 40:4 (1981): 323–328.
Braun, Virginia. “Female Genital Cosmetic Surgery: A Critical Review of Current Knowledge and Contemporary Debates.” Journal of Women’s Health 19:7 (2010): 1393–1407.
Braun, Virginia. “‘The Women Are Doing It for Themselves’: The Rhetoric of Choice and Agency around Female Genital ‘Cosmetic Surgery.’” Australian Feminist Studies 24:60 (2009): 233–249.
Brown, Wendy. “Civilizational Delusions: Secularism, Tolerance, Equality.” Theory & Event 15:2 (2012).
Brown, Wendy. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
al-Buhūtī (d. 1641; Egypt), Manṣūr ibn Yūnus. Daqāʾiq ulī al-nuhá li-sharḥ al-muntahá. 3 vols. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub, 1993.
cooke, miriam, Fawzia Ahmad, Margot Badran, Minoo Moallem, and Jasmin Zine. “Roundtable Discussion: Religion, Gender, and the Muslimwoman.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 24:1 (2008): 91–119.
Cornell, Drucilla. The Imaginary Domain: Abortion, Pornography and Sexual Harassment. New York: Routledge, 1995.
Darby, Robert, and J. Steven Svoboda. “A Rose by Any Other Name? Rethinking the Similarities and Differences between Male and Female Genital Cutting.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 21:3 (2007): 301–323.
Davis, Simone Weil. “Loose Lips Sink Ships.” Feminist Studies 28:1 (2002): 7–35.
Diaz, Derrick. “Minors and Cosmetic Surgery: An Argument for State Intervention.” DePaul Journal of Health Care Law 14:2 (2012): 235–270.
Dines, Gail. Pornland: How Porn Has Hijacked Our Sexuality. Boston, MA: Beacon, 2010.
Doyle, Jennifer. Campus Sex, Campus Security. semiotext(e) intervention series, 19. South Pasadena, CA: MIT Press, 2015.
Dworkin, Andrea. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: Perigee Books, 1981.
Dworkin, Andrea, and Catharine A. MacKinnon. Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day for Women’s Equality. Minneapolis, MN: Organizing Against Pornography, 1988.
Eich, Thomas. “Induced Miscarriage in Early Mālikī and Ḥanafī fiqh.” Islamic Law and Society 16:3–4 (2009): 302–336.
El-Tayeb, Fatima. European Others: Queering Ethnicity in Postnational Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.
Elver, Hilal. The Headscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Fitzgerald, Timothy, ed. Religion and the Secular: Historical and Colonial Formations. London: Equinox Pub., 2007.
Fraytak, Dana A. “Influence of Pornography on Rape and Violence against Women: A Social Science Approach.” Buffalo Women’s Law Journal 9 (2000–2001): 263–294.
al-Ghazālī (d. 1111; Iran), Abū Ḥāmid Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad. Marriage and Sexuality in Islam. Translated by Madelain Farah. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust, 2012.
Gilbert, Susan. “Children’s Bodies, Parents’ Choices.” The Hastings Center Report 39:1 (2009): 14–15.
Graybill, Rhiannon. “Critiquing the Discourse of Consent.” Journal of Feminist Studies in Religion 33:1 (2017): 175–176.
Higgins, Tracy E. “Why Feminists Can’t (or Shouldn’t) Be Liberals.” Fordham Law Review 72:5 (2004): 1629–1641.
Ibn Qudāmah al-Maqdīsī (d. 1223; Syria), Muwaffaq al-Dīn ʿAbdallāh ibn Aḥmad. al-Mughnī. Edited by ʿAbdallāh ibn ʿAbd al-Muḥsin Turkī and ʿAbd al-Fattāḥ Muḥammad Ḥulw. 3rd ed. 15 vols. Riyadh: Dār ʿĀlim al-Kutub, 1997.
Ibn Taymiyyah (d. 1328; Syria), Aḥmad ibn ʿAbd al-Ḥalīm. Majmūʿat al-fatāwá. Edited by ʿĀmir Jazzār and Anwar Bāz. 37 vols. Riyadh: Maktabat al-ʿAbīkān, 1997.
Ibn Yaḥyá al-Maghribī (d. 1174), al-Samawʾal. Nuzhat al-aṣḥāb fī muʿāsharat al-aḥbāb: Kitāb fī l-muʿāsharah al-zawjīyah wa-ādābihā wa-mutaʿalliqātihā. Edited by Sayyid Kasrawi Ḥasan̄. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 2008.
Irigaray, Luce. The Sex Which Is Not One. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.
Johnsdotter, Sara, and Birgitta Essén. “Genitals and Ethnicity: The Politics of Genital Modifications.” Reproductive Health Matters 18:35 (2010): 29–37.
al-Kāsānī (d. 1189; Syria), Abū Bakr ibn Masʿūd. Badāʾiʿ al-ṣanāʾiʿ fī tartīb al-sharāʾiʿ. 7 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1986.
Kimmel, Michael S. The Gender of Desire: Essays on Male Sexuality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2005.
Kiraly, Miranda, and Meagan Tyler. Freedom Fallacy: The Limits of Liberal Feminism. Ballarat, Vic.: Connor Court Publishing, 2015.
Koppelman, Connie. “The Politics of Hair.” Frontiers: a journal of women studies 17:2 (1996): 87–88.
Kouba, Leonard J., and Judith Muasher. “Female Circumcision in Africa: An Overview.” African Studies Review 28:1 (1985): 95–110.
Lapidus, Ira M., and Lena Salaymeh. “Women and Family.” In Islamic Societies to the Nineteenth Century: A Global History, 181–190. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lapidus, Ira M., and Lena Salaymeh. “Women and Family in the Ottoman Era.” In Islamic Societies to the Nineteenth Century: A Global History, 462–467. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lapidus, Ira M., and Lena Salaymeh. “Women and Family: Ideology versus Reality.” In Islamic Societies to the Nineteenth Century: A Global History, 264–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lapidus, Ira M., and Lena Salaymeh. “Women in the Middle East: 19th–21st Centuries.” In A History of Islamic Societies, 652–666. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Lapidus, Ira M., and Lena Salaymeh. “Women, Family, and Society.” In Islamic Societies to the Nineteenth Century: A Global History, 19–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Lewis, Reina. Muslim Fashion: Contemporary Style Cultures. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015.
Lewis, Reina, and Sara Mills, eds. Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003.
Liddle, Joanna, and Shirin Rai. “Feminism, Imperialism and Orientalism: The Challenge of the ‘Indian Woman.’” Women’s History Review 7:4 (1998): 495–520.
Lietti, Anna. “Comment le voile musulman est devenu fétiche pornographique.” L’Hebdo (2015). Published electronically 22 October at http://www.hebdo.ch/hebdo/cadrages/detail/comment-le-voile-musulman-est-devenu-f%C3%A9tiche-pornographique. Archived at http://actuels3.rssing.com/chan–23064699/all_p67.html.
Lugones, María. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25:4 (2010): 742–759.
Lutz, Catherine. “Living Room Terrorists: Rates of Domestic Violence Are Three to Five Times Higher among Military Couples Than among Civilian Ones.” The Women’s Review of Books 21:5 (2004): 17–18.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory.” Signs 7:3 (1982): 515–544.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.
MacKinnon, Catharine A. “Vindication and Resistance: A Response to the Carnegie Mellon Study of Pornography in Cyberspace.” Georgetown Law Journal 83:5 (1994–1995): 1959–1968.
Mahdawi, Arwa. “Hair Is the Western Woman’s Veil.” The Guardian, 10 January 2014.
Mani, Lata. Contentious Tradition: The Debate on Sati in Colonial India. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
Marcuse, Herbert. One-Dimensional Man. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1964.
Massad, Joseph A. Islam in Liberalism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
McBride, Hillary. “Aesthetic Labiaplasty Is Never Just a ‘Choice.’” feminist current, 14 January 2016.
Mendez, Xhercis. “Notes toward a Decolonial Feminist Methodology: Revisiting the Race/Gender Matrix.” Trans-Scripts 5 (2015): 41–59.
Mendoza, Breny. “Coloniality of Gender and Power: From Postcoloniality to Decoloniality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Feminist Theory, ed. Lisa Disch and Mary Hawkesworth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
Miller, Joshua I. “Fashion and Democratic Relationships.” Polity 37:1 (2005): 3–23.
Mir-Hosseini, Ziba. “Muslim Women’s Quest for Equality: Between Islamic Law and Feminism.” Critical Inquiry 32:4 (2006): 629–645.
Moaveni, Azadeh. “How the Trump Administration Is Exploiting Iran’s Burgeoning Feminist Movement.” The New Yorker (2018). Published electronically 9 July. https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/how-the-trump-administration-is-exploiting-irans-burgeoning-feminist-movement.
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.
Moors, Annelies. “Islam and Fashion on the Streets of San’a, Yemen.” Etnofoor 16:2 (2003): 41–56.
Morgan, Kathryn Pauly. “Women and the Knife: Cosmetic Surgery and the Colonization of Women’s Bodies.” Hypatia 6:3 (1991): 25–53.
Mulvey, Laura. “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” In Film Theory and Criticism: Introductory Readings, ed. Leo Braudy and Marshall Cohen, 833–844. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Nader, Laura. “Orientalism, Occidentalism and the Control of Women.” Cultural Dynamics 2:3 (1989): 323–355.
Nader, Laura. “The Subordination of Women in Comparative Perspective.” Urban Anthropology and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 15:3/4 (1986): 377–397.
Nandy, Ashis. The Savage Freud and Other Essays on Possible and Retrievable Selves. Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
al-Nawawī (d. 1277; Syria), Abū Zakarīyā Muḥyī al-Dīn ibn Sharaf. Minhāj al-ṭālibīn wa-ʿumdat al-muftīn. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥammad Ṭāhir Shaʿbān. Beirut: Dār al-Minhāj, 2005.
Nnaemeka, Obioma, ed. Female Circumcision and the Politics of Knowledge: African Women in Imperialist Discourses. Westport, CT: Praeger, 2005.
Olsen, Frances. “Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis.” Texas Law Review 63:3 (1984): 387–432.
Paul, Pamela. Pornified: How Pornography Is Damaging Our Lives, Our Relationships, and Our Families. New York: Owl Books, 2006.
Penny, Laurie. “This Isn’t ‘Feminism.’ It’s Islamophobia.” The Guardian (2013). Published electronically 22 December.
Permanyer, Iñaki. “A Critical Assessment of the UNDP’s Gender Inequality Index.” Feminist Economics 19:2 (2013): 1–32.
Power, Nina. One-Dimensional Woman. Winchester, UK: O Books, 2009.
Puar, Jasbir. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007.
Public Policy Advisory Network, On Female Genital Surgeries in Africa. “Seven Things to Know about Female Genital Surgeries in Africa.” The Hastings Center Report 42:6 (2012): 19–27.
al-Qaraḍāwī, Yūsuf. Fatāwá fiqhiyyah fī l-masāʾil al-jinsiyyah: wa-yalīhā ādāb al-jimāʿ li-Abī Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī, fī l-jimāʿ wa-l-bāh li-Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah. Quneitra: Dār al-Ḥarf lil-Nashr wa-l-Tawzīʿ, 2007.
Rankin, Kenrya. “Watch: 100 Years of Hijab Fashion in 1 Minute.” Colorlines (2016). Published electronically 24 May.
Rodriguez, Sarah B. Female Circumcision and Clitoridectomy in the United States: A History of a Medical Treatment. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2014.
Russell-Robinson, Joyce. “African Female Circumcision and the Missionary Mentality.” Issue: A Journal of Opinion 25:1 (1997): 54–57.
Salaymeh, Lena. The Beginnings of Islamic Law: Late Antique Islamicate Legal Traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Salaymeh, Lena. “‘Comparing’ Jewish and Islamic Legal Traditions: Between Disciplinarity and Critical Historical Jurisprudence.” Critical Analysis of Law, New Historical Jurisprudence 2:1 (2015): 153–172.
Salaymeh, Lena. “Juvenile Justice in Muslim-Majority States.” In Juvenile Justice in Global Perspective, ed. Franklin E. Zimring, Maximo Langer, and David S. Tanenhaus, 249–287. New York: New York University Press, 2015.
Salaymeh, Lena. “Propaganda, Politics, and Profiteering: Islamic Law in the Contemporary U.S.” Jadaliyya (2014). Published electronically September 29. http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/19408/propaganda-politics-and-profiteering_islamic-law-i.
Scott, David, and Charles Hirschkind, eds. Powers of the Secular Modern. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.
Scott, Joan W. The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.
Scott, Joan W. Sex & Secularism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Unversity Press, 2017.
Sehlikoglu, Sertaç. “Revisted: Muslim Women’s Agency and Feminist Anthropology of the Middle East.” Contemporary Islam 12:1 (2018): 73–92.
Sehlikoglu, Sertaç. “Revisted: Muslim Women’s Agency and Feminist Anthropology of the Middle East.” Contemporary Islam (2017): 1–20.
al-Shīrāzī (d. 1083; Iran), Abū Isḥāq Ibrāhīm ibn ʿAlī ibn Yūsuf Fīrūzābādī. al-Muhadhdhab fī fiqh al-Imām al-Shāfiʿī. Edited by Zakarīyā ʿUmayrāt and Muḥammad ibn Aḥmad Baṭṭāl. 3 vols. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyyah, 1995.
Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. “Can the Subaltern Speak?”. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg, 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1988.
Synnott, Anthony. “Shame and Glory: A Sociology of Hair.” The British Journal of Sociology 38:3 (1987): 381–413.
Tarlo, Emma, and Annelies Moors, eds. Islamic Fashion and Anti-Fashion: New Perspectives from Europe and North America. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.
Toor, Saadia. “Gender, Sexuality, and Islam under the Shadow of Empire.” The Scholar and Feminist Online 9:3 (2011).
Toor, Saadia. “Imperialist Feminism Redux.” Dialectical Anthropology 36:3/4 (2012): 147–160.
Wolfe, Patrick. “Can the Muslim Speak? An Indebted Critique.” History and Theory 41:3 (2002): 367–380.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1649 | 209 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 250 | 19 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 436 | 46 | 0 |
This article presents three arguments about defects in imperialist feminism. First, I show that imperialist feminists engage in decontextualized comparisons: they consistently compare Western women to the Muslimwoman, without comparing Muslim men and women or comparing non-Muslim men and women. These inconsistent comparisons are the source of significant misrepresentations of Muslim women. Second, I propose that imperialist feminists view Muslim women through the heteronormative male gaze. That is, when imperialist feminists assess Muslim women’s practices, they implement the normative assumptions of heterosexual males in the West. Third, I argue that imperialist feminists incorrectly presume that Western women enjoy full autonomy or fail to recognize that women everywhere do not enjoy full autonomy. I present medieval Islamic legal ideas about a wife’s right to sexual fulfillment as evidence that the liberal myth of autonomy is not translatable to orthodox Islamic jurisprudence.
Cet article présente trois arguments sur les défauts du féminisme impérialiste. Premièrement, je montre que les féministes impérialistes s’engagent dans des comparaisons décontextualisées: elles comparent systématiquement les femmes occidentales à la femme musulmane supposée, sans comparer les hommes et les femmes musulmans ni les hommes et les femmes non musulmans. Ces comparaisons incohérentes sont la source d’importantes déclarations fausses au sujet de la femme musulmane. Deuxièmement, je suggère que les féministes impérialistes voient les femmes musulmanes à travers le regard masculin hétéronormé. En d’autres termes, lorsque les féministes impérialistes évaluent les pratiques des femmes musulmanes, elles appliquent les hypothèses normatives des hommes hétérosexuels en Occident. Troisièmement, je soutiens que les féministes impérialistes présument à tort que les femmes occidentales jouissent d’une autonomie totale ou ne reconnaissent pas que les femmes du monde entier ne jouissent pas d’une autonomie complète. Je présente les doctrines juridiques islamiques médiévales sur le droit de la femme à la pleine jouissance sexuelle comme preuve que le mythe libéral de l’autonomie n’est pas transportable dans la jurisprudence islamique orthodoxe.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 1649 | 209 | 14 |
Full Text Views | 250 | 19 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 436 | 46 | 0 |