Apocalyptic studies are nowadays a prominent field of enquiry within biblical studies. Yet, scholars have not been able to agree upon a definition of the term apocalyptic. The following study attempts to move this debate foreword by acknowledging the term as a modern scientific designation that scholars apply to historical sources and thus requires a definition based upon its use in modern scholarship. Since the use of the term has become a modus operandi in biblical and modern studies, an analysis of the various applications of the term by modern scholars provides the point of departure for a reflection upon its definition by means of a comparative study.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Thomas Francis Glasson, “What is Apocalyptic?,” New Testament Studies 27 (1979) 98-105, esp. 98-99, 105.
Michael Wolter, “Apokalyptik als Redeform im Neuen Testament,” New Testament Studies 51 (2005) 171-191, 178. He compares the perceived literary genres of apocalyptic and gospels, concluding that both only became genres in the course of the canonisation process.
Wolter, “Apokalyptik als Redeform im Neuen Testament,” 180-182.
Wolter, “Apokalyptik als Redeform im Neuen Testament,” 182-190.
S.J. Stein (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism Volume 3: Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age (New York: Continuum, 2003).
Cf. Johanna Rahner, Einführung in die christliche Eschatologie (Freiburg: Herder, 2010), 90-92.
See Damian Thompson, The End of Time. Faith and Fear in the Shadow of the Millennium (London: Sinclair-Stevenson, 1996), 177-190.
Joachim Valentin, Eschatologie (Paderborn: Schöningh, 2013), 191-205. In many cases, political developments were interpreted as eschatological signs up to the point that some writers proclaimed a concrete date for the second coming of Christ.
See Eva Horn, “Die romantische Verdunkelung. Weltuntergänge und die Geburt des letzten Menschen um 1800,” in Abendländische Apokalyptik. Kompendium zur Genealogie der Endzeit (eds. V. Wieser, C. Zolles, C. Feik, M. Zolles, and L. Schlöndorff; Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2013), 101-124.
See Ted Daniels, A Doomsday Reader. Prophets, Predictors, and Hucksters of Salvation (New York: New York University Press, 1999), 56-78; David Redles, “Nazi End Times. The Third Reich as Millenial Reich,” in End of Days. Essays on the Apocalypse from Antiquity to Modernity (eds. K. Kinane and M.A. Ryan; London: McFarland, 2009), 173-196.
This paragraph follows J. Eugene Clay, “Apocalypticism in Eastern Europe,” in The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism Volume 3: Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age (ed. S.J. Stein; New York: Continuum, 2003), 293-321.
The whole paragraph follows Alain Milhou, “Apocalypticism in Central and South American Colonialism,” in The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism Volume 3: Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age (ed. S.J. Stein; New York: Continuum, 2003), 3-35.
Reiner Smolinski, “Apocalypticism in Colonial North America,” in The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism Volume 3: Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age (ed. S.J. Stein; New York: Continuum, 2003), 36-71, 47.
See James West Davidson, The Logic of Millennial Thought. Eighteenth-Century New England (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977).
Herman Melville, White-Jacket or The World in a Man-of-War (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), 151. The equalization of the usa with Israel is explained by Shalom Goldman, “‘God’s New Israel’: American Identification with Israel Ancient and Modern,” in The Bible in the Public Square. Its Enduring Influence in American Life (eds. M.A. Chancey, C. Meyers, and E.M. Meyers; Atlanta: sbl Press, 2014), 81-92.
James H. Moorhead, “Apocalypticism in Mainstream Protestantism, 1800 to the Present,” in The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism Volume 3: Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age (ed. S.J. Stein; New York: Continuum, 2003), 72-107, 88.
Paul Boyer, “The Growth of Fundamentalist Apocalyptic in the United States,” in The Encyclopedia of Apocalypticism Volume 3: Apocalypticism in the Modern Period and the Contemporary Age (ed. S.J. Stein; New York: Continuum, 2003), 140-178, 164.
Stephen D. O’Leary, Arguing the Apocalypse. A Theory of Millennial Rhetoric (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994), 209.
See Wolfgang Palaver, “Säkulare und religiöse Deutungen aktueller Katastrophen. Vom 11. September bis Fukushima,” in Gott in der Geschichte. Zum Ringen um das Verständnis von Heil und Unheil in der Geschichte des Christentums (eds. M. Delgado and V. Leppin; Fribourg and Stuttgart: Academic Press Fribourg and Kolhammer, 2013), 459-474.
See Reinhold Zwick, “Jüngste Tage. Variationen der Apokalypse im Film,” in Jüngste Tage. Die Gegenwart der Apokalyptik (eds. M.N. Ebertz and R. Zwick; Freiburg: Herder, 1999) 184-226.
See Peter Podrez, Der Sinn im Untergang. Filmische Apokalypsen als Krisentexte im atomaren und ökologischen Diskurs (Stuttgart: Ibidem, 2011).
Yvonne Sherwood, “‘Napalm Falling like Prostitutes’. Occidental Apocalypse as Managed Volatility,” in Abendländische Apokalyptik: Kompendium zur Genealogie der Endzeiten (eds. V. Wieser, C. Zolles, C. Feik, M. Zolles, and L. Schlöndorff; Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2013), 39-74, 45.
Ingolf Ahlers, “Das Diskursfeld ‘Apokalyptik’ aus sozialwissenschaftlicher Sicht,” in Apokalyptik. Zeitgefühl mit Perspektive? (eds. G. Riedl, M. Negele, and C. Mazenik; Paderborn: Schöningh, 2011), 35-47, 37.
John J. Collins, The Apocalyptic Imagination: An Introduction to Jewish Apocalyptic Literature (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1998), 269. For interpreting Revelation as a letter, see Martin Karrer, Die Johannesoffenbarung als Brief: Studien zu ihrem literarischen, historischen und theologischen Ort (frlant 140; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1986). It is noteworthy that the book mostly describes visions the figure of John experiences. These visions are always introduced by the statement “I saw” (εἶδον) (Rev 4:1; 5:1; 6:1; 7:1; 8:2; etc.).
Heinz Giesen, Die Offenbarung des Johannes (Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 1997), 34-36 and Klaus Wengst, Wie lange noch? Schreien nach Recht und Gerechtigkeit—eine Deutung der Apokalypse des Johannes (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2010), 53-94. Especially the eating of food that was sacrificed to idols is criticized in Rev 2:20. For the whole of Revelation the crisis of empire, i.e. the overall might and seemingly unlimited power of the Roman Empire, can be seen as the major focus of the work, see Xavier Alegre Santamaria, “Die Offenbarung des Johannes—eine gläubige Relecture des Lebens in Zeiten der Krise,” Concilium 50 (2014) 261-268.
Lichtenberger, Die Apokalypse, 193-194. A later dating is unlikely, mainly due to the canonisation process, see Wengst, Wie lange noch?, 64-70.
Adela Yarbro Collins, Crisis & Catharsis: The Power of the Apocalypse (Philadelphia: The Westminster Press, 1984), 104-107.
Adela Yarbro Collins, Mark: A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007), 594.
David S. du Toit, “Die Danielrezeption in Markus 13,” in Die Geschichte der Daniel-Auslegung in Judentum, Christentum und Islam: Studien zur Kommentierung des Danielbuches in Literatur und Kunst (eds. K. Bracht and D.S. du Toit; Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2007), 55-76, 59.
Günther Bornkamm, “µυστήριον, µυέω,” ThWNT 4:829. Also see Wolter, “Apokalyptik als Redeform im Neuen Testament,” 184-185. It is even thought that Paul took an older prophetic utterance and explicitly added it here in the tractate as a small apocalyptic excursus, see Jörg Baumgarten, Paulus und die Apokalyptik: Die Auslegung apokalyptischer Überlieferungen in den echten Paulusbriefen (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag, 1975), 106-107.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 329 | 15 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 89 | 7 | 2 |
Apocalyptic studies are nowadays a prominent field of enquiry within biblical studies. Yet, scholars have not been able to agree upon a definition of the term apocalyptic. The following study attempts to move this debate foreword by acknowledging the term as a modern scientific designation that scholars apply to historical sources and thus requires a definition based upon its use in modern scholarship. Since the use of the term has become a modus operandi in biblical and modern studies, an analysis of the various applications of the term by modern scholars provides the point of departure for a reflection upon its definition by means of a comparative study.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 329 | 15 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 196 | 4 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 89 | 7 | 2 |