This paper investigates the question of deification in two groups of New Testament texts, i.e. the Pauline Epistles and the “Johannine literature” (fourth Gospel and Epistles of “John”), as well as the Greek patristic tradition. Though a specialized vocabulary referring to deification is missing from these groups of texts, Greek fathers used a very sophisticated combination of Pauline and “Johannine” concepts for the development of their respective theologies of deification. This study tries to explain why the patristic theologies of deification are so closely emulating Paul and “John” and it detects a common line that runs through the background of Paul and “John” as well as the patristic notion of theosis, namely the experience of the beginnings of the Christian life as an ontological transformation, i.e. conversion.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Becker J. Sänger D. & Mell U. “Das Verhältnis des johanneischen Kreises zum Paulinismus.” Paulus und Johannes 198 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck 473 497 wunt
Blackwell Ben C. Christosis: Pauline Soteriology in Light of Deification in Irenaeus and Cyril of Alexandria 2010 314 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck wunt ii
Campbell D. Porter Stanley E. & Cross Anthony R. “Dying with Christ: The Origin of a Metaphor?” Baptism, the New Testament and the Church: Historical and Contemporary Studies in Honour of R.E.O. White 1999 171 London Continuum International Publishing 273 293 jsntss
Campbell Douglas A. The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul 2013 Grand Rapids, Michigan Eerdmans
Chester Stephen J. Conversion at Corinth: An Exploration of the Understandings of Conversion Held by the Apostle Paul and the Corinthian Christians 2003 Edinburgh T & T Clark
Crook Zeba A. Reconceptualising Conversion: Patronage, Loyalty, and Conversion in the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean 2004 130 Berlin de Gruyter bznw
Despotis A. Kok Jacobus & Dunne John A. “Exploring a Common Background of Paul and ‘John’: Mission and Conversion.” Insiders versus Outsiders: Exploring the Dynamic Relationship between Mission and Ethos in the New Testament 2014 14 105 144 pprt
Dunson B. C. “Faith in Romans: The Salvation of the Individual or Life in Community?” JSNT 2011 34 19 46
Finlan Stephen & Kharlamov Vladimir Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology 2006 52 Eugene, Or. Pickwick Publications Princeton Theological Monograph Series
Gaventa Beverly R. From Darkness to Light: Aspects of Conversion in the New Testament 1986 20 Philadelphia, Pa. Fortress Press obt
Gorman Michael J. Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology 2009 Grand Rapids, Mich William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.
Gorman Michael J. “Romans: The First Christian Treatise on Theosis.” JTI 2011 5 13 34
Gorman Michael J. Campbell Constantine R. , Thate Michael J. & Vanhoozer Kevin J. “Paul’s Corporate, Cruciform, Missional Theosis in 2 Corinthians.” ‘In Christ’ in Paul: Explorations in Paul’s Theology of Union and Participation 2014 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck wunt ii
Harding M. Bird Michael F. “Kyrios Christos. Johannine and Pauline Perspectives on the Christ Event.” Paul and the Gospels: Christologies, Conflicts and Convergences 2011 411 London T & T Clark 169 196 lnts
Hellholm David Hellholm David et al. “Vorgeformte Tauftraditionen und deren Benutzung in den Paulusbriefen.” Ablution, Initiation, and Baptism: Late Antiquity, Early Judaism, and Early Christianity 2011 176 Berlin de Gruyter 415 496 bznw
Hill Peter C. & Hood Ralph W. Jr. Psychology of Religion, Fourth Edition: An Empirical Approach 2009 Guilford Publications
Hoegen-Rohls C. Frey J. & Schnelle U. “Johanneische Theologie im Kontext paulinischen Denkens? Eine forschungsgeschichtliche Skizze.” Kontexte des Johannesevangeliums 2004 175 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck 593 612 wunt
Litwa D. We are Being Transformed 2012 187 Berlin de Gruyter bznw
Litwa M. D. Becoming Divine: An Introduction to Deification in Western Culture 2014 Eugene, Oregon Cascade Books
Louth A. Christensen Michael J. & Wittung Jeffery A. “The Place of Theosis in Orthodox Theology.” Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions 2008 Grand Rapids, Mich Baker Academic 32 45
Macaskill Grant Union with Christ in the New Testament 2013 Oxford Oxford Univ. Press
Michaels Ramsey Porter Stanley E. & Cross Anthony R. “Baptism and Conversion in John: a Particular Baptist Reading.” Baptism, the New Testament and the Church: Historical and Contemporary Studies in Honour of R.E.O. White 1999 171 London Continuum International Publishing jsntss
Mollat D. “Ils regarderon Celui qu’ils ont transpercé’: La conversion chez saint Jean.” 1960 47 95 114
Paloutzian Reymond , Murken Sebastian , Streib Heinz & Rößler-Namini Sussan Paloutzian R. F. & Park C. L. “Conversion, Deconversion and Spiritual Transformation: A Multilevel Interdisciplinary View.” Handbook of the Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, Second Edition 2013 Guilford Publications 399 421
Pesch Wilhelm Der Ruf zur Entscheidung: Die Bekehrungspredigt d. Neuen Testamentes 1964 Freiburg i. Br. Seelsorge Verl Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Missionarische Seelsorge 4
Rubel Georg Erkenntnis und Bekenntnis: Der Dialog als Weg der Wissensvermittlung im Johannesevangelium 2009 54 Münster Aschendorf nta nf
Russell Norman The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition 2006 Oxford Oxford Univ. Press oecs
Sandage Steven & Moe Shane Pargament Kenneth I. “Spiritual Experience: Conversion and Transformation.” apa Handbook of Psychology, Religion, and Spirituality 2013 Washington, D.C. American Psychological Association 407 422 apa Handbooks in Psychology
Schnackenburg R. “Ephesus: Entwicklung einer Gemeinde von Paulus zu Johannes.” bz 1991 35 41 63
Schnelle U. “Paulus und Johannes.” EvTh 1987 47 212 228
Schwankl Otto Licht und Finsternis: Ein metaphorisches Paradigma in den johanneischen Schriften 1995 Freiburg im Breisgau Herder Univ., Habil.-Schr.-Würzburg, 1994. hbs 5
Schwindt Rainer Gesichte der Herrlichkeit: Eine exegetisch-traditionsgeschichtliche Studie zur paulinischen und johanneischen Christologie 2007 50 Freiburg im Breisgau Herder hbs
Segal Alan F. Paul the Convert: The Apostolate and Apostasy of Saul the Pharisee 1990 New Haven Yale Univ. Pr
Shantz Colleen Paul in Ecstasy: The Neurobiology of the Apostle’s Life and Thought 2009 Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Press
Theißen Gerd “Die Bekehrung des Paulus und seine Entwicklung vom Fundamentalisten zum Universalisten.” et 2010 70 10 25
Theobald Michael Das Evangelium nach Johannes: Kapitel 1-12 2009 Regensburg Pustet rnt
Theobald Michael Theobald Michael “Welt bei Paulus und Johannes.” Studien zum Corpus Iohanneum 2010 267 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck 416 428 wunt
Trebilco Paul R. The Early Christians in Ephesus from Paul to Ignatius 2004 166 Tübingen Mohr Siebeck wunt
Varghese Johns The Imagery of Love in the Gospel of John 2009 177 Roma G&BP Gregorian & Biblical Press Pontifical Gregorian Univ., Diss.-Rome, 2007. AnBib
Witherup Ronald D. Conversion in the New Testament 1994 Collegeville, Minn Liturgical Press Zacchaeus Studies New Testament
Zeller Dieter Studien zu Philo und Paulus 2011 165 Göttingen V & R Unipress bbb
Zeller Dieter Zeller Dieter “Theologie der Mission bei Paulus.” Studien zu Philo und Paulus 2011 165 Göttingen V & R Unipress 279 294 bbb
Zock Hetty Bremmer Jan N. , Bekkum Wout Jac. van & Molendijk Arie L. “Paradigms in Psychological Conversion Research. Between Social Science and Literary Analysis.” Paradigms, Poetics, and Politics of Conversion 2006 Leuven, Dudley, MA Peeters 40 58 Groningen Studies in Cultural Change v. 19
See research reviews in C. Hoegen-Rohls, “Johanneische Theologie im Kontext paulinischen Denkens? Eine forschungsgeschichtliche Skizze,” in Kontexte des Johannesevangeliums (ed. J. Frey and U. Schnelle; wunt 175; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2004), J. Becker, “Das Verhältnis des johanneischen Kreises zum Paulinismus,” in Paulus und Johannes (ed. D. Sänger and U. Mell; wunt 198; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck) and Rainer Schwindt, Gesichte der Herrlichkeit: Eine exegetisch-traditionsgeschichtliche Studie zur paulinischen und johanneischen Christologie (hbs 50; Freiburg im Breisgau: Herder, 2007).
Russell, The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition, 87.
Cf. Dieter Zeller, “Theologie der Mission bei Paulus,” in Studien zu Philo und Paulus (ed. Dieter Zeller; bbb 165; Göttingen: V & R Unipress, 2011), 283: “welche situationsmäßigen Faktoren, besonders etwa vorgefundene Traditionen, die gemeinsame Sprache <des Paulus und des Johannes> mitbedingen“. See an extended analysis concerning the conversionist and missionary background of Paul and “John” in A. Despotis, “Exploring a Common Background of Paul and ‘John’: Mission and Conversion,” in Insiders versus Outsiders: Exploring the Dynamic Relationship between Mission and Ethos in the New Testament (ed. Jacobus Kok and John A. Dunne; pprt 14, 2014), 105-144.
See Becker in Sänger and Mell, Das Verhältnis des johanneischen Kreises zum Paulinismus, 491. Similarly, Michael Theobald, Das Evangelium nach Johannes: Kapitel 1-12 (rnt; Regensburg: Pustet, 2009), 76: „Die Berührungen, die zu registrieren sind, resultieren aus gemeinsamen traditionsgeschichtlichen Wurzeln im antiochenisch-syrischen Raum.”
David Hellholm, “Vorgeformte Tauftraditionen und deren Benutzung in den Paulusbriefen,” in Ablution, Initiation, and Baptism: Late Antiquity, Early Judaism, and Early Christianity (ed. David Hellholm et al.; bznw 176; Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), 415-496.
See Douglas A. Campbell, The Deliverance of God: An Apocalyptic Rereading of Justification in Paul (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans, 2013), 161.
Michael Theobald, “Welt bei Paulus und Johannes,” in Studien zum Corpus Iohanneum (ed. Michael Theobald; wunt 267; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2010), 416.
See the discussion in Macaskill, Union with Christ in the New Testament, 42-76.
Russell, The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition, 85.
Cf. D. Campbell, “Dying with Christ: The Origin of a Metaphor?,” in Baptism, the New Testament and the Church: Historical and Contemporary Studies in Honour of R.E.O. White (ed. Stanley E. Porter and Anthony R. Cross; jsntss 171; London: Continuum International Publishing, 1999), 292-293.
Michael J. Gorman, “Paul’s Corporate, Cruciform, Missional Theosis in 2 Corinthians,” in ‘In Christ’ in Paul: Explorations in Paul’s Theology of Union and Participation (ed. Constantine R. Campbell, Michael J. Thate and Kevin J. Vanhoozer; wunt ii; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014), 196.
Colleen Shantz, Paul in Ecstasy: The Neurobiology of the Apostle’s Life and Thought (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 9.
Michael J. Gorman, Inhabiting the Cruciform God: Kenosis, Justification, and Theosis in Paul’s Narrative Soteriology (Grand Rapids, Mich: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co, 2009), 162-163.
Some scholars (e.g. Ramsey Michaels, “Baptism and Conversion in John: a Particular Baptist Reading,” in Baptism, the New Testament and the Church: Historical and Contemporary Studies in Honour of R.E.O. White (ed. Stanley E. Porter and Anthony R. Cross; jsntss 171; London: Continuum International Publishing, 1999)) deny the idea that “John” speaks in his texts about a ritual baptism. In my view the negation of baptismal allusions in “John” in most cases reflects an anti-sacramentalist tension in the interpretation of the fourth Gospel. However, the symbol of water is so strong in “John” that one cannot deny the baptismal implications. Even if there is possible to read it as a symbol of the role of Christ or his Spirit the conversion rhetorics we detect in “John” compel us to read the symbol of water in this conversionist setting as a baptismal allusion (S. Theobald, Das Evangelium nach Johannes, 251).
Russell, The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition, 106.
See Russell, The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition, 110.
Russell, The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition, 197.
A. Louth, “The Place of Theosis in Orthodox Theology,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions (ed. Michael J. Christensen and Jeffery A. Wittung; Grand Rapids, Mich: Baker Academic, 2008); Louth in Christensen and Wittung, The Place of Theosis in Orthodox Theology, 43.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 483 | 59 | 13 |
Full Text Views | 269 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 131 | 14 | 2 |
This paper investigates the question of deification in two groups of New Testament texts, i.e. the Pauline Epistles and the “Johannine literature” (fourth Gospel and Epistles of “John”), as well as the Greek patristic tradition. Though a specialized vocabulary referring to deification is missing from these groups of texts, Greek fathers used a very sophisticated combination of Pauline and “Johannine” concepts for the development of their respective theologies of deification. This study tries to explain why the patristic theologies of deification are so closely emulating Paul and “John” and it detects a common line that runs through the background of Paul and “John” as well as the patristic notion of theosis, namely the experience of the beginnings of the Christian life as an ontological transformation, i.e. conversion.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 483 | 59 | 13 |
Full Text Views | 269 | 5 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 131 | 14 | 2 |