Limitations of a Purely Salvation-historical Approach to Biblical Theology
In: Horizons in Biblical TheologySearch for other papers by Darian Lockett in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
A salvation-historical approach to biblical theology emphasizes the historical and progressive nature of revelation such that the Bible’s primary meaning is (too often) reduced to its reference to the sequential events of a special (salvation) history. After offering a general description of the development of the salvation-historical approach to biblical theology, the essay considers the representative example of D. A. Carson. Then, noting the criticisms of Hans Frei, Karl Barth, and Brevard Childs, the paper argues that limiting one’s biblical theology to a salvation-historical approach replaces Christ as the subject matter of both Testaments with “the temporally distinct and ordered stages of the history of salvation.” Although the insights of a redemptive-historical biblical theology are important, when taken as the exclusive methodology for biblical theology it risks flattening the relationship between the two Testaments and missing Scripture’s theological subject matter.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1210 | 211 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 637 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 460 | 25 | 1 |
Limitations of a Purely Salvation-historical Approach to Biblical Theology
In: Horizons in Biblical TheologySearch for other papers by Darian Lockett in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
A salvation-historical approach to biblical theology emphasizes the historical and progressive nature of revelation such that the Bible’s primary meaning is (too often) reduced to its reference to the sequential events of a special (salvation) history. After offering a general description of the development of the salvation-historical approach to biblical theology, the essay considers the representative example of D. A. Carson. Then, noting the criticisms of Hans Frei, Karl Barth, and Brevard Childs, the paper argues that limiting one’s biblical theology to a salvation-historical approach replaces Christ as the subject matter of both Testaments with “the temporally distinct and ordered stages of the history of salvation.” Although the insights of a redemptive-historical biblical theology are important, when taken as the exclusive methodology for biblical theology it risks flattening the relationship between the two Testaments and missing Scripture’s theological subject matter.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1210 | 211 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 637 | 11 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 460 | 25 | 1 |