The Curious Case of the Blasphemer: Ambiguity as Literary Device in Leviticus 24:10-23
In: Horizons in Biblical TheologySearch for other papers by Chelcent Fuad in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article argues that, instead of the nature of the crime or its punishment, the underlying problem that needs oracular law in the account of the blasphemer in Lev 24:10-23 is the ambiguity of the criminal’s identity. This ambiguity is employed in the narrative as a literary device by which the redactor of the narrative introduces the universal applicability of the blasphemy law that includes both natives and foreigners. By so doing, the redactor of Lev 24 serves the Holiness Code’s theological agenda, namely, the extension of holiness to all inhabitants of the land since pollution of the land by any of its inhabitants may eventually cause the expulsion of the whole people from the land. To this end, the redactor rewrites the Covenant Code and frames it with the narrative of the mixed-pedigree blasphemer.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Bartusch, Mark W. Understanding Dan: An Exegetical Study of a Biblical City, Tribe and Ancestor. London: Sheffield Academic Press, 2003.
-
Bibb, Bryan D. Ritual Words and Narrative Worlds in the Book of Leviticus. New York, NY: Clark, 2009.
-
Chavel, Simeon. Oracular Law and Priestly Historiography in the Torah. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.
-
Cohen, Shaye J. D. The Beginnings of Jewishness: Boundaries, Varieties, Uncertainties. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
-
Douglas, Mary. Leviticus as Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
-
Fishbane, Michael. Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004.
-
Freedman, Harry, Simon Maurice Lehrman, Jacob Israelstam, Judah J. Slotki, L. Rabbinowitz, and Maurice Simon, eds. Midrash Rabbah. London: Soncino Press, 1983.
-
Gabel, J. B., and C. B. Wheeler. “The Redactor’s Hand in the Blasphemy Pericope of Leviticus XXIV.” VT 30 (1980): 227-229.
-
Hartley, John E. Leviticus. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1992.
-
Holguín, Julián Andrés González. “Leviticus 24: 10-23: An Outsider Perspective.” Hebrew Studies 56 (2015): 89-102.
-
Hutton, Rodney R. “The Case of the Blasphemer Revisited (LEV. XXIV 10-23).” VT 49 (1999): 532-541.
-
Jackson, Bernard S. “Talion and Purity: Some Glosses on Mary Douglas.” Reading Leviticus: A Conversation with Mary Douglas. Edited by John F. A. Sawyer. Sheffield, England: Sheffield Academic Press, 1996.
-
Joosten, Jan. People and Land in the Holiness Code: An Exegetical Study of the Ideational Framework of the Law in Leviticus 17-26. Leiden: Brill, 1996.
-
Joüon, Paul, and T. Muraoka. GCK. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico, 2005.
-
Kamionkowski, S. Tamar. “Leviticus 24,10-26 in Light of H’s Concept of Holiness.” The Strata of the Priestly Writings: Contemporary Debate and Future Directions. Edited by Sarah Shectman and Joel S. Baden. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich, 2009.
-
Keil, Carl Friedrich, and Franz Delitzsch. Commentary on the Old Testament. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2011.
-
Leuchter, Mark. “The Ambiguous Details in the Blasphemer Narrative: Sources and Redaction in Leviticus 24: 10-23.” JBL 130 (2011): 431-450.
-
Livingston, Dennis H. “The Crime of Leviticus XXIV 11.” VT 36 (1986): 352-354.
-
Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus 1-16: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. 1st ed. The Anchor Bible v. 3. New York: Doubleday, 1991.
-
Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus 17-22: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
-
Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus 23-27: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.
-
Milgrom, Jacob. Numbers: The Traditional Hebrew Text with the New JPS Translation. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990.
-
Milgrom, Jacob. “Religious Conversion and the Revolt Model for the Formation of Israel.” JBL 101 (1982): 169-176.
-
Mittwoch, H. “The Story of the Blasphemer Seen in a Wider Context.” VT 15 (1965): 386-389.
-
Nihan, Christophe. From Priestly Torah to Pentateuch: A Study in the Composition of the Book of Leviticus. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007.
-
Nihan, Christophe. “Murder, Blasphemy and Sacral Law: Another Look at Lev 24,10-23.” ZABR 17 (2011): 211-240.
-
Nihan, Christophe. “Resident Aliens and Natives in the Holiness Legislation.” The Foreigner and the Law: Perspectives from the Hebrew Bible and the Ancient Near East. Edited by Reinhard Achenbach, Rainer Albertz, and Jakob Wöhrle. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2011.
-
Noth, Martin. Leviticus: A Commentary. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1965.
-
Trevaskis, Leigh. “The Purpose of Leviticus 24 within Its Literary Context.” VT 59 (2009): 295-312.
-
Vroom, Jonathan. “Recasting Mišpātîm: Legal Innovation in Leviticus 24: 10-23.” JBL 131 (2012): 27-44.
-
Weinfeld, Moshe. Deuteronomy and the Deuteronomic School. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns, 2014.
-
Weingreen, Jacob. “The Case of the Blasphemer (Leviticus XXIV 10 Ff.).” VT 22 (1972): 118.
-
Willis, T. M. “Blasphemy, Talion, and Chiasmus: The Marriage of Form and Content in Lev 24,13-23.” Bib 90 (2009): 68-74.
-
Woods, Clyde M., and Justin Rogers. Leviticus-Numbers. Joplin, MO: College Press, 2006.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 826 | 93 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 169 | 6 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 232 | 12 | 0 |
The Curious Case of the Blasphemer: Ambiguity as Literary Device in Leviticus 24:10-23
In: Horizons in Biblical TheologySearch for other papers by Chelcent Fuad in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article argues that, instead of the nature of the crime or its punishment, the underlying problem that needs oracular law in the account of the blasphemer in Lev 24:10-23 is the ambiguity of the criminal’s identity. This ambiguity is employed in the narrative as a literary device by which the redactor of the narrative introduces the universal applicability of the blasphemy law that includes both natives and foreigners. By so doing, the redactor of Lev 24 serves the Holiness Code’s theological agenda, namely, the extension of holiness to all inhabitants of the land since pollution of the land by any of its inhabitants may eventually cause the expulsion of the whole people from the land. To this end, the redactor rewrites the Covenant Code and frames it with the narrative of the mixed-pedigree blasphemer.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 826 | 93 | 30 |
| Full Text Views | 169 | 6 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 232 | 12 | 0 |