The Logical Construction of Value-Theory: More on Fine and Saad-Filho
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Jim Kincaid in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Fine and Saad-Filho are wrong to insist that an abstract category of production should be the starting point of Marxist value-theory in logical, temporal and causal terms. Marx, in Capital, begins with a repertoire of simpler categories and slowly constructs the complex category of capitalist production. It is vital that exploitation should be seen as one phase (however crucial) of a process of capital-in-motion, and due weight given to money, competition and realisation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 450 | 67 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 124 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 116 | 12 | 0 |
The Logical Construction of Value-Theory: More on Fine and Saad-Filho
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Jim Kincaid in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Fine and Saad-Filho are wrong to insist that an abstract category of production should be the starting point of Marxist value-theory in logical, temporal and causal terms. Marx, in Capital, begins with a repertoire of simpler categories and slowly constructs the complex category of capitalist production. It is vital that exploitation should be seen as one phase (however crucial) of a process of capital-in-motion, and due weight given to money, competition and realisation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 450 | 67 | 9 |
| Full Text Views | 124 | 3 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 116 | 12 | 0 |
