Save

Editorial Introduction

In: Historical Materialism
Author:
Paul Blackledge Leeds Metropolitan University, Email: p.blackledge@leedsmet.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Paul Blackledge in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

Lars Lih’s study of Lenin’s What Is to Be Done? demolishes the shared liberal and Stalinist myth of Leninism as an ice-cold ideology of professional and opportunistic revolutionary organisation. He conclusively shows, not only that Lenin’s thought had deep roots in the democratic culture of contemporary Marxism, but also that it was predicated upon a strong belief in the revolutionary potential of the working class. Lih’s research thus moves the debate about Lenin’s contribution to Marxism on from the tired caricatures of the textbooks to focus instead upon his complex relationship to the Marxism of the Second International. By showing that Lenin’s Marxism was much more sophisticated and textured than is normally allowed, this debate opens his rich legacy to contemporary re-evaluation.<xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN1">1</xref>

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 301 23 0
Full Text Views 90 4 0
PDF Views & Downloads 75 14 0