Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln: A Curious Convergence

in Historical Materialism
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln held very different views on the ‘social question’. This essay explores the way in which they converged in their estimation of slavery during the course of the Civil War; Marx was an ardent abolitionist, and Lincoln came to see this position as necessary. It is argued that the rôle of runaway slaves – called ‘contraband’ – and German-revolutionary ’48ers played a significant rôle in the radicalisation of Lincoln and the direction of the War.

Karl Marx and Abraham Lincoln: A Curious Convergence

in Historical Materialism

Sections

References

AndersonBenedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, (Verso, London 1996).

AshworthJohn, Slavery Capitalism and Politics in the Antebellum Republic Volume 1: Commerce and Compromise 1820–1850, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1995).

AshworthJohn, Slavery Capitalism and Politics in the Antebellum Republic Volume 2: The Coming of the Civil War 1850–1861, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2007).

BarkinKenneth, '‘Ordinary Germans, Slavery and the U.S. Civil War’' (2008) 93(1) The Journal of African American History: 70-79.

BenselRichard Franklin, Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America 1859–1877, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 1990).

BlackburnRobin, '‘State of the Union’' (2010) II(61) New Left Review: 153-174.

BruceRobert, 1877: Year of Violence, (Bobbs-Merrill Company, New York 1959).

BuhlePaul, Marxism in the United States: Remapping the History of the American Left, (Verso, London 1991).

BurbankDavid, Reign of the Rabble: The St Louis General Strike of 1877, (A.M. Kelley, New York 1978 [1966]).

CroftsDaniel, '‘And the War Came’', in Lacy K. Ford (ed), A Companion to the Civil War and Reconstruction, (Blackwell, Oxford 2005).

DraperHal, Karl Marx’s Theory of Revolution Volume 3: The ‘Dictatorship of the Proletariat’, (Monthly Review Press, New York 1986).

DunayevskayaRaya, Marxism and Freedom: From 1776 Until Today, (Pluto Press, London 1971 [1958]).

EngelsFriedrich, '‘Engels to Marx’' (1961 [1861]) 1961.

FernbachDavid, '‘Introduction’', in David Fernbach (ed), Karl Marx: The First International and After, (Penguin, Harmondsworth 1974).

FonerEric, Free Soil Free Labor Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party Before the Civil War, (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1970).

FonerEric, Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution 1863–1877, (Harper and Row, New York 1988).

FonerEric, '‘Lincoln and Colonization’' (2008) 2008.

FonerEric, The Fiery Trial: Abraham Lincoln and American Slavery, (W.W. Norton and Company, New York 2010).

Eric Foner (ed), Our Lincoln: New Perspectives on Lincoln and His World, (W.W. Norton and Company, New York 2008).

FonerPhilip S., The Great Labor Uprising of 1877, (Monad Press, New York 1977).

FredricksonGeorge M., Big Enough to Be Inconsistent: Abraham Lincoln Confronts Slavery and Race, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 2008).

GallagherGary, '‘Blueprint for Victory’', in James M. McPherson and William James Cooper (eds), Writing the Civil War: The Quest to Understand, (University of South Carolina Press, Charlottesville 1998).

GenoveseEugene, The Political Economy of Slavery: Studies in the Economy and Society of the Slave South, (Vintage Books, New York 1967).

GreenJames R., Death in the Haymarket: A Story of Chicago the First Labor Movement and the Bombing that Divided America, (Pantheon Books, New York 2006).

HahnSteven, A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 2003).

HahnSteven, The Political Worlds of Slavery and Freedom, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. 2009).

Harold Holzer (ed), The Lincoln Douglas Debates, (Harper-Collins, New York 1993).

JackBryan M., The St. Louis African American Community and the Exodusters, (University of Missouri Press, Columbia 2007).

JohnsonCarol, '‘The Problem of Reformism and Marx’s Theory of Fetishism’' (1980) I(119) New Left Review: 70-96.

LaFeberWalter, The New Empire: An Interpretation of American Expansion 1860–1898, (Cornell University Press, Ithaca 1963).

LevineBruce, The Spirit of 1848: German Immigrants Labor Conflict and the Coming of the Civil War, (University of Illinois Press, Urbana 1992).

McPhersonJames M., This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War, (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007).

McPhersonJames M., '‘A. Lincoln, Commander in Chief’' (2008) 2008.

MarxKarl, '‘The North American Civil War’' (1961 [1861]) 1961.

MarxKarl, '‘Marx to Engels’' (1985 [1861]) 1985.

MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich, The Civil War in the United States, (International Publishers, New York 1961).

MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich, Collected Works, (Progress Publishers, Moscow 1984).

MarxKarlEngelsFriedrich, Collected Works, (Lawrence and Wishart, London 1985).

MenandLouis, The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America, (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York 2001).

Messer-KruseTimothy, The Yankee International: Marxism and the American Reform Tradition 1848–76, (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill 1998).

MontgomeryDavid, Beyond Equality: Labor and the Radical Republicans 1862–1872, (Alfred A. Knopf, New York 1967).

MooreBarringtonJr., Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Transitions to Democracy, (Columbia University Press, New York 1966).

OakesJames, The Radical and the Republican: Frederick Douglass Abraham Lincoln and the Triumph of Antislavery, (W.W. Norton and Company, New York 2007).

OakesJames, '‘Natural Rights, Citizenship Rights, States’ Rights, and Black Rights: Another Look at Lincoln and Race’' (2008) 2008.

PotterDavid M., Don E. Fehrenbacher (ed), The Impending Conflict 1848–1861, (Harper and Row, New York 1976).

RichardsLeonard L., Gentlemen of Property and Standing: Anti-Abolition Mobs in Jacksonian America, (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1978 [1970]).

RossDorothy, '‘Lincoln and the Ethics of Emancipation: Universalism, Nationalism, Exceptionalism’' (2009) 96(2) The Journal of American History: 379-399.

SinhaManisha, '‘Allies for Emancipation: Lincoln and Black Abolitionists’' (2008) 2008.

StamppKenneth M., And the War Came: The North and the Secession Crisis 1860–1861, (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge 1970).

VincentCharles, Black Legislators in Louisiana During Reconstruction, (Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge 1976).

WilentzSean, The Rise of American Democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln, (W.W. Norton and Company, New York 2005).

1.

Marx 1961.

2.

Marx 1985p. 114.

3.

Marx 1961pp. 57–70.

4.

Marx 1961p. 68. Here I only briefly explain and evaluate Marx’s analysis of the origins of the Civil War though the texts I have cited clearly enough reject economic reductionism. Marx’s stress on the centrality of political issues can be compared with that found in Moore 1966. For a recent account using many of Marx’s concepts see Ashworth 2007.

5.

Marx 1961p. 68.

6.

Marx 1961p. 71.

7.

Marx and Engels 1984p. 50.

8.

Foner 2010.

9.

Marx and Engels 1961p. 72.

10.

Engels 1961p. 326.

11.

Anderson 1996.

13.

Crofts 2005p. 197.

16.

Wilentz 2005p. 783. Wilentz proceeds from these remarks to the conclusion: ‘the only just and legitimate way to settle the matter [i.e. the difference over slavery-extension] Lincoln insisted . . . was through a deliberate democratic decision made by the citizenry.’ (Wilentz 2005 p. 763.) A riposte to this is suggested by Louis Menand’s observation: ‘the Civil War was a vindication as Lincoln had hoped it would be of the American experiment. Except for one thing which is that people who live in democratic societies are not supposed to settle their disagreements by killing one another.’ (Menand 2001 p. x.)

17.

Quoted in Bensel 1990p. 18. For an account of Seward’s expansionist plans and their frustration by the larger processes set in motion by the Civil War see LaFeber 1963 pp. 24–32.

18.

Levine 1992.

20.

Levine 1992p. 125. In later decades some German-Americans did indeed soft-pedal women’s rights when seeking to recruit Irish-American trade-unionists but while this should be duly noted it is far from characterising all German-Americans whether followers of Marx or not. For an interesting study which sometimes veers towards caricature see Messer-Kruse 1998. This author has a justifiable pride in the native American radical tradition and some valid criticisms of some of the positions adopted by German-American ‘Marxists’ but is so obsessed with pitting the two ethnic political cultures against one another that he fails to notice how effectively they often combined especially in the years 1850–70. See Buhle 1991 for a more balanced assessment.

21.

Barkin 2008p. 71.

22.

Gallagher 1998.

23.

Marx and Engels 1984pp. 233–4.

24.

Marx and Engels 1961pp. 202–6.

25.

Marx and Engels 1961p. 258.

27.

McPherson 2008p. 33.

29.

Ross 2009p. 346.

30.

Menand 2001p. 45.

31.

Menand 2001pp. 52–3.

33.

Holzer (ed.) 1993p. 189. This was not an off-hand remark but forms part of a careful introduction to his speech.

34.

Marx and Engels 1961p. 273.

35.

Marx and Engels 1961pp. 260–1.

36.

Marx and Engels 1961p. 281. The meanings of the address are rarely considered which makes it the more regrettable when it is interpreted in a tendentious way as is the case with Messer-Kruse 1998 pp. 54–6 in which he has Marx complaining at the ‘bother’ of having to write something of such little importance as the address and that he only consented to do so because: ‘In Marx’s view slavery had to be destroyed in order to allow for the historical development of the white working class.’ (Messer-Kruse 1998 p. 54.)

37.

Marx and Engels 1961pp. 262–3.

38.

Vincent 1976p. 22.

39.

Oakes 2007.

41.

Quoted in Fredrickson 2008p. 126.

43.

Marx and Engels 1961pp. 276–7.

44.

Marx and Engels 1961p. 277.

46.

Montgomery 1967.

47.

Fernbach 1974p. 14.

49.

Draper 1986p. 273.

50.

Dunayevskaya 1971pp. 81–91.

51.

See Blackburn 2010pp. 153–76.

52.

Quoted in Messer-Kruse 1998p. 191.

53.

Draper 1986p. 15.

54.

See Foner 1988 and Hahn 2003pp. 103–5.

55.

See Blackburn 2010 and also Burbank 1978. For the rôle of African-Americans in the strike and later see Jack 2007 especially pp. 142–50. See also Bruce 1959; Foner 1977; Green 2006.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 20 20 17
Full Text Views 7 7 7
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0