Within the agenda of historical-materialist theory and practice Sociological Marxism has delivered a compelling perspective on how to explore and link the analysis of civil society, the state, and the economy within an explicit focus on class exploitation, emancipation, and rich ethnography. This article situates a major analysis of state formation, the rise of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), and the growth of a broader Islamist movement in Turkey within the main current of Sociological Marxism. It does so in order to critically examine the rather bold revision of the theory of hegemony at the heart of Cihan Tuğal’s Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism, which posits the separate interaction of political society, civil society and the state in theorising hegemonic politics in Turkey. My contention is that the revision of hegemony that this analysis offers and its state-theoretical commitments are deeply problematic due to the reliance on what I term ‘ontological exteriority’, meaning the treatment of state, civil society and the economy as always-already separate spheres. The focus of the critique then moves toward highlighting a frustrating lack of direct engagement with Antonio Gramsci’s writings in this disquisition on hegemony and passive revolution, which has important political consequences. While praise for certain aspects of ethnographic and spatial analysis is raised, it is argued that any account of the reordering of hegemony and the restructuring of spatial-temporal contexts of capital accumulation through conditions of passive revolution also needs to draw from a more sophisticated state theory, a direct reading of Gramsci, and broader scalar analysis of spatial relations and uneven development under capitalism.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Bekmen Ahmet ‘Bir Devrimi Nitelemek’ Sosyalist Demokrasi için Yeniyol 2011 accessed 26 March 2013 51 available at: <http://www.sdyeniyol.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=510:bir-devrimi-nitelemek-ahmet-bekmen&catid=64:siyasal-guendem&Itemid=112>
Bieler Andreas & Morton Adam David ‘The Deficits of Discourse in IPE: Turning Base Metal into Gold?’ International Studies Quarterly 2008 52 1 103 128
Bozdoğan Sibel & Akcan Esra Turkey: Modern Architectures in History 2012 London Reaktion Books
Buci-Glucksmann Christine Fernbach David Gramsci and the State 1980 London Lawrence and Wishart
Burawoy Michael ‘The Extended Case Method’ Sociological Theory 1998 16 1 4 33
Burawoy Michael ‘For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi’ Politics & Society 2003 31 2 193 261
Burawoy Michael ‘For Public Sociology’ American Sociological Review 2005 70 1 4 28
Burawoy Michael The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and One Theoretical Tradition 2009 Berkeley University of California Press
Burawoy Michael ‘The Roots of Domination: Beyond Bourdieu and Gramsci’ Sociology 2012 46 2 187 206
Burawoy Michael, Blum Joseph A., George Sheba, Gille Zsuzsa, Gowan Teresa, Haney Lynne, Klawiter Maren, Lopez Steven H., Ó Riain Seán & Thayer Millie Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imaginations in a Postmodern World 2000 Berkeley University of California Press
Burawoy Michael & Wright Erik Olin Turner Jonathan H. ‘Sociological Marxism’ Handbook of Sociological Theory 2001 New York Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
Burns Tony Aristotle and Natural Law 2011a London Continuum
Burns Tony ‘Interpreting and Appropriating Texts in the History of Political Thought: Quentin Skinner and Poststructuralism’ Contemporary Political Theory 2011b 10 3 313 331
Buttigieg Joseph A. ‘The Contemporary Discourse on Civil Society: A Gramscian Critique’ boundary 2 2005 32 1 33 52
Cox Robert W. ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 1981 10 2 126 155
Cox Robert W. ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method’ 1983 12 2 162 175
De Leon Cedric, Desai Manali & Tuğal Cihan ‘Political Articulation: Parties and the Constitution of Cleavages in the United States, India, and Turkey’ Sociological Theory 2009 27 3 193 219
Ekers Michael, Hart Gillian, Kipfer Stefan & Loftus Alex Gramsci: Space, Nature, Politics 2012 Oxford Wiley-Blackwell
Femia Joseph V. Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness, and the Revolutionary Process 1981 Oxford Clarendon Press
Foucault Michel Gordon Colin ‘Prison Talk’ Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 1980 [1975] Brighton Harvester Press
Gill Stephen Power and Resistance in the New World Order 2008 Second Edition Basingstoke Palgrave
Göker Emrah ‘Pasif Devrim: Ehlileşmiş Talepler’ BirGün 2010 June 17 accessed 26 March 2013 available at: <http://www.birgun.net/book_index.php?news_code=1276773450&year=2010&month=06&day=17>
Gramsci Antonio Hoare Quintin & Nowell-Smith Geoffrey Selections from the Prison Notebooks 1971 London Lawrence and Wishart
Gramsci Antonio Hoare Quintin Mathews John Selections from Political Writings, 1910–1920 1977 London Lawrence and Wishart
Gramsci Antonio Buttigieg Joseph A. Prison Notebooks 1996 Volume 2 New York Columbia University Press
Gramsci Antonio Buttigieg Joseph A. Prison Notebooks 2007 Volume 3 New York Columbia University Press
Green Marcus E. & Ives Peter ‘Review of Perspectives on Gramsci: Politics and Social Theory, edited by Joseph Francese, and Gramsci and Global Politics: Hegemony and Resistance, edited by Mark McNally and John Schwartzmantel’ Rethinking Marxism 2011 23 2 282 291
Gülalp Haldun ‘Capitalism and the Modern Nation-State: Rethinking the Creation of the Turkish Republic’ Journal of Historical Sociology 1994 7 2 155 176
Hall Stuart Hunt Alan ‘Popular-Democratic vs Authoritarian Populism: Two Ways of “Taking Democracy Seriously”’ Marxism and Democracy 1980 London Lawrence and Wishart
Harvey David The Limits to Capital 2007 New and Updated Edition London Verso
İnsel Ahmet ‘AKP pasif devrim mi gerçekleştirdi?’ Radikal 2011 January 28 accessed 26 March 2013 available at: <http://www.radikal.com.tr/Radikal.aspx?aType=RadikalDetayV3&ArticleID=1038178&CategoryID=40>
Jessop Bob Bieler Andreas & Morton Adam David ‘Gramsci as a Spatial Theorist’ Images of Gramsci: Connections and Contentions in Political Theory and International Relations 2006 London Routledge
Jessop Bob State Power: A Strategic-Relational Approach 2008 Cambridge Polity Press
Keyder Çağlar State and Class in Turkey: A Study in Capitalist Development 1987 London Verso
Keyder Çağlar ‘The Turkish Bell Jar’ New Left Review 2004 II 28 65 84
Lefebvre Henri Nicholson-Smith Donald The Production of Space 1991 Oxford Blackwell Publishing
Lefebvre Henri Brenner Neil & Elden Stuart ‘Space and the State’ State, Space, World: Selected Essays 2009 [1978] Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
Löwy Michael ‘Figures of Weberian Marxism’ Theory and Society 1996 25 3 431 446
Macciocchi Maria-Antonietta Sazbón José Gramsci y la revolución de Occidente 1975 México D.F. Siglo XXI
Marcuse Herbert Shapiro Jeremy J. ‘Industrialisation and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber’ Negations: Essays in Critical Theory 1968 [1965] London Allen Lane
Morton Adam David ‘The Age of Absolutism: Capitalism, the Modern States-System and International Relations’ Review of International Studies 2005 31 3 495 517
Morton Adam David Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy 2007 London Pluto Press
Morton Adam David ‘The Continuum of Passive Revolution’ Capital & Class 2010 34 3 315 342
Morton Adam David Revolution and State in Modern Mexico: The Political Economy of Uneven Development 2011a Lanham, MD. Rowman and Littlefield
Morton Adam David İnce Barış Gramsci’yi Çözümlemek: Küresel Ekonomide Hegemonya ve Pasif Devrim 2011b Istanbul Kalkedon Yayınları
Morton Adam David ‘Talkin’ ‘bout Revolution?’ For the Desk Drawer 2011c March 8 accessed 26 March 2013 available at: <http://adamdavidmorton.com/2011/03/talkin-bout-revolution/>
Ollman Bertell Alienation: Marx’s Conception of Man in Capitalist Society 1976 Second Edition Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Öncü Ahmet ‘Dictatorship plus Hegemony: A Gramscian Analysis of the Turkish State’ Science & Society 2003 67 3 302 328
Özuğurlu Metin ‘The TEKEL Resistance Movement: Reminiscences on Class Struggle’ Capital & Class 2011 35 2 179 187
Portelli Hugues Braun Maria Gramsci y el bloque histórico 1973 México D.F. Siglo XXI
Riley Dylan J. & Desai Manali ‘The Passive Revolutionary Route to the Modern World: Italy and India in Comparative Perspective’ Comparative Studies in Society and History 2007 49 4 815 847
Ruccio David ‘Review of Envisioning Real Utopias by Erik Olin Wright’ Historical Materialism 2011 19 4 219 227
Said Edward W. ‘Representing the Colonised: Anthropology’s Interlocutors’ Reflections on Exile: And Other Literary and Cultural Essays 2001 [1988] London Granta Books
Sassoon Anne Showstack Gramsci’s Politics 1987 Second Edition Minneapolis University of Minnesota Press
Soja Edward W. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory 1989 London Verso
Thomas Peter D. The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism, Historical Materialism 2009 Leiden Brill Book Series
Trimberger Ellen Revolution from Above: Military Bureaucrats and Development in Japan, Turkey, Egypt, and Peru 1978 New Brunswick, NJ. Transaction Books
Tuğal Cihan ‘NATO’s Islamists: Hegemony and Americanisation in Turkey’ New Left Review 2007 II 44 5 34
Tuğal Cihan ‘The Greening of Istanbul’ New Left Review 2008 II 51 65 80
Tuğal Cihan Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism 2009 Stanford Stanford University Press
Tuğal Cihan Pasif Devrim: İslami Muhalefetin Düzenle Bütünleşmesi 2010 Istanbul Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları
Tuğal Cihan ‘Egypt’s Path Could be Distinct from Turkey’s and Iran’s’ Jadaliyya 2011 February 21 accessed 26 March 2013 available at: <http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/706/>
Tuğal Cihan ‘Fight or Acquiescence? Religion and Political Process in Turkey’s and Egypt’s Neoliberalisations’ Development and Change 2012a 43 1 23 51
Tuğal Cihan ‘Egypt’s Emergent Passive Revolution’ Jadaliyya 2012b June 20 accessed 26 March 2013 available at: <http://www.jadaliyya.com/pages/index/6095/egypts-emergent-passive-revolution>
van der Pijl Kees Gill Stephen ‘State Socialism and Passive Revolution’ Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations 1993 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
van der Pijl Kees Transnational Classes and International Relations 1998 London Routledge
Weber Max Gerth H.H. & Mills C. Wright ‘Politics as a Vocation’ From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology 2009 [1918] London Routledge
Williams Raymond Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays 1980 London Verso
Wood Ellen Meiksins The Retreat from Class: A New ‘True’ Socialism 1986 London Verso
Wood Ellen Meiksins Democracy against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism 1995 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Wright Erik Olin Wright Erik Olin ‘Foundations of a Neo-Marxist Class Analysis’ Approaches to Class Analysis 2005 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Wright Erik Olin Envisioning Real Utopias 2010 London Verso
Yalman Galip L. Balkan Nesecan & Savran Sungur ‘The Turkish State and Bourgeoisie in Historical Perspective: A Relativist Paradigm or a Panoply of Hegemonic Strategies?’ The Politics of Permanent Crisis: Class, Ideology and State in Turkey 2002 New York Nova Science Publishers Inc
Yalman Galip L. Transition to Neoliberalism: The Case of Turkey in the 1980s 2009 Istanbul Bilgi University Press
Zürcher Erik J. ‘The Ottoman Legacy of the Turkish Republic: An Attempt at a New Periodization’ Die Welt des Islams 1992 32 2 237 253
. See Özuğurlu 2011.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 24.
. Tuğal 2007, pp. 20, 23.
. Tuğal 2009, pp. 4, 31–2. Note that the Turkish edition carries a slightly different emphasis in its subtitle, see Tuğal 2010.
. Tuğal 2007, p. 34.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 33.
. See Burawoy 2003 and Tuğal 2009, pp. 24–31 and 270, n. 15, emphasis added.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 262.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 24.
. Burawoy 2003, pp. 199–200.
. Burawoy 2003, p. 198; Tuğal 2009, pp. 24–31.
. Wright 2005, pp. 5, 30.
. Burawoy and Wright 2001.
. Burawoy and Wright 2001, p. 462, n. 9.
. Burawoy 1998, pp. 5, 14–16; Burawoy 2005, p. 11; Burawoy 2009, pp. 38–44.
. See Tuğal 2009, pp. 12–13.
. See Bozdoğan and Akcan 2012, pp. 239–42.
. Burawoy 2003, p. 211; Burawoy 2012, p. 192.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 220: Q13§27 (1932–4). It should be noted that I follow a specific convention associated with citing the Prison Notebooks. In addition to giving the reference to the selected anthologies, the notebook number (Q), section (§), and notebook date accompanies all citations, to enable the reader to trace their specific collocation. The concordance table used is that compiled by Marcus Green and is available at the website of the International Gramsci Society, <http://www.internationalgramscisociety.org>.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 243: Q13§7 (1932–4).
. Burawoy 2003, pp. 213, 214.
. Gramsci 2007, p. 213: Q7§83 (1930–2). For more detail on Gramsci’s theorising of political modernity and the origins of capitalism in terms of feudal crisis, agrarian class structures and the rise of specific social property relations, see Morton 2005; Morton 2007, Chapter 3. My Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy has also been translated into Turkish, see Morton 2011b.
. Gramsci 2007, p. 187: Q7§35 (1930–2).
. Gramsci 2007, p. 310: Q8§130 (1931–2).
. See Cox 1981, pp. 135–8; Cox 1983, pp. 162–9.
. van der Pijl 1993, pp. 237–40; van der Pijl 1998, pp. 64–83.
. Gramsci 2007, p. 310: Q8§130 (1931–2).
. van der Pijl 1998, p. 79.
. Gramsci 1971, pp. 119–20: Q10I§9 (1932–5).
. Gramsci 2007, p. 317: Q8§142 (1931–2).
. Gramsci 2007, p. 75: Q6§88 (1930–2).
. Tuğal 2009, p. 24.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 25.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 270, n. 15.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 263.
. The key phrase is from Wood 1986, p. 55, n. 15.
. Burawoy 2003, p. 201.
. Burns 2011a, pp. 13–26.
. Burns 2011a, p. 16.
. Burns 2011b, p. 317.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 450: Q11§28 (1932–3); and see Morton 2007, pp. 15–38.
. Buttigieg 2005, pp. 36–7.
. Gramsci 2007, p. 117: Q6§155 (1930–2).
. Tuğal 2009, p. 27.
. Löwy 1996.
. Weber 2009, pp. 82–3.
. Keyder 2004, p. 65.
. Göker 2010.
. Wood 1995, pp. 31–6.
. Marcuse 1968, pp. 210, 215.
. Williams 1980, p. 36
. But see Morton 2010.
. See Morton 2007, pp. 63–73; Morton 2011a.
. Gramsci 1977, p. 69.
. Gramsci 2007, p. 9: Q6§10 (1930–2).
. Gramsci 1971, p. 115: Q10II§61 (1932–5).
. Buci-Glucksmann 1980, p. 315.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 219: Q13§27 (1932–4).
. See Riley and Desai 2007.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 32.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 32.
. Tuğal 2009, pp. 8, 36, 222, 230, 232.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 272, n. 1.
. Yalman 2002.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 40.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 40.
. İnsel 2011.
. Yalman 2002, p. 33.
. See Yalman 2009.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 235. But see how Tuğal (Tuğal 2011, 2012b) usefully questions whether Egypt’s future pathway out of the Arab Spring might be a restoration along the lines of the ‘Turkish model’ in the form of passive revolutionaries such as Mohamed Morsi narrowing the agenda and demands of the revolution. Similarly, Morton (Morton 2011c) focuses on the Arab ‘revolutions’ that pose anew some venerable questions of revolutionary transformation, not least whether they will result in fundamental changes to economic life in the region or a passive revolutionary restoration of the old political order whereby state machines remain significantly intact, a process continually in development and subject to change and challenge.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 255.
. See Cox 1983, p. 167; Gill 2008, p. 58.
. See Macciocchi 1975, pp. 112–14; Thomas 2009, pp. 133–57.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 132: Q13§1 (1932–4).
. Gramsci 1971, pp. 105–6: Q15§59 (1933).
. Gramsci 1971, p. 243: Q13§7 (1932–4).
. Gramsci 1971, p. 239: Q6§155 (1930–2); see Thomas 2009, pp. 137–41.
. Jessop 2008, p. 113.
. See Morton 2007, pp. 87–94.
. Gramsci 1971, pp. 105–6: Q15§59 (1933).
. See Portelli 1973, p. 33; van der Pijl 1998, pp. 79–83.
. Portelli 1973, p. 30.
. See Morton 2011a, pp. 18–24; and Femia 1981, pp. 35–50.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 80, n. 49: Q19§24 (1934–5).
. Gramsci 1971, p. 80, n. 4: Q19§24 (1934–5).
. Gramsci 1971, p. 59: Q19§24 (1934–5); Gramsci 2007, p. 75: Q6§88 (1930–2).
. Gramsci 2007, p. 252: Q8§25 (1930–2). It should be commented such a draft note in the Prison Notebooks now falls into the common categorisation of an ‘A-text’, to be distinguished from ‘B-texts’ that exist in only one version, or ‘C-texts’ that consist of material derived from previous drafts.
. Gramsci 2007, p. 252: Q8§25 (1931–2).
. Sassoon 1987, p. 207; see also Femia 1981, p. 260, n. 74.
. Hall 1980, p. 182.
. Tuğal 2008, p. 66.
. Lefebvre 2009, pp. 243–4.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 30.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 119.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 208.
. Bekmen 2011.
. Tuğal 2009, p. 272, n. 29.
. Soja 1989, pp. 89–90; see also Jessop 2006.
. Said 2001, p. 464.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 182: Q13§17 (1932–4).
. Gramsci 1996, p. 53: Q3§49 (1930).
. Harvey 2007, p. 235.
. See Lefebvre 1991.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 109: Q15§11 (1933).
. Green and Ives 2011, pp. 282–3.
. See Wright 2010 and Ruccio 2011.
. Gramsci 1971, p. 160: Q13§18.
. Foucault 1980, pp. 53–4.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2868 | 526 | 43 |
Full Text Views | 571 | 38 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 442 | 85 | 16 |
Within the agenda of historical-materialist theory and practice Sociological Marxism has delivered a compelling perspective on how to explore and link the analysis of civil society, the state, and the economy within an explicit focus on class exploitation, emancipation, and rich ethnography. This article situates a major analysis of state formation, the rise of the Justice and Development Party (AKP), and the growth of a broader Islamist movement in Turkey within the main current of Sociological Marxism. It does so in order to critically examine the rather bold revision of the theory of hegemony at the heart of Cihan Tuğal’s Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism, which posits the separate interaction of political society, civil society and the state in theorising hegemonic politics in Turkey. My contention is that the revision of hegemony that this analysis offers and its state-theoretical commitments are deeply problematic due to the reliance on what I term ‘ontological exteriority’, meaning the treatment of state, civil society and the economy as always-already separate spheres. The focus of the critique then moves toward highlighting a frustrating lack of direct engagement with Antonio Gramsci’s writings in this disquisition on hegemony and passive revolution, which has important political consequences. While praise for certain aspects of ethnographic and spatial analysis is raised, it is argued that any account of the reordering of hegemony and the restructuring of spatial-temporal contexts of capital accumulation through conditions of passive revolution also needs to draw from a more sophisticated state theory, a direct reading of Gramsci, and broader scalar analysis of spatial relations and uneven development under capitalism.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 2868 | 526 | 43 |
Full Text Views | 571 | 38 | 7 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 442 | 85 | 16 |