This paper contributes to the debate on the role of financial derivatives for capitalism. It responds to Bryan and Rafferty’s defence of their analysis and their critique of my own. The paper argues that their analysis confuses what a financial derivative does, and mixes together different kinds of derivative – and non-derivative – that play very different roles. After detailing these points, the paper discusses the relationship between gold, money and derivatives, rejecting their notion that derivatives are some kind of new ‘commodity money’. An important theme absent from Bryan and Rafferty’s analysis is the relationship of financial trading and derivatives markets to parasitism in the imperialist world economy. To illustrate this, the paper notes advantages enjoyed by the major financial powers – the US and the UK – that are the main centres for the origination of derivatives and for derivatives trading.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
BEA Survey of Current Business 2012 US Bureau of Economic Analysis, July
BIS ‘Triennial Central Bank Survey: Report on Global Foreign Exchange Market Activity in 2010’ 2010a Bank for International Settlements, December
BIS ‘Triennial Central Bank Survey of Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity in 2010 (Final Results)’ 2010b Bank for International Settlements, December, available at: <http://www.bis.org/publ/rpfxf10t.htm>
Bryan Dick & Rafferty Michael ‘Money in Capitalism or Capitalist Money?’ Historical Materialism 2006a 14 1 75 95
Bryan Dick & Rafferty Michael Capitalism with Derivatives: A Political Economy of Financial Derivatives, Capital and Class 2006b Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
Bryan Dick & Rafferty Michael ‘Financial Derivatives and the Theory of Money’ Economy and Society 2007 36 1 134 158
Bryan Dick & Rafferty Michael ‘Why We Need to Understand Derivatives in Relation to Money: A Reply to Tony Norfield’ Historical Materialism 2012 20 3 97 109
Chen Qianying, Filardo Andrew, He Dong & Zhu Feng ‘International Spillovers of Central Bank Balance Sheet Policies’ 2011 BIS papers No. 66, available at: <http://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap66p.pdf>
Eichengreen Barry Exorbitant Privilege: The Rise and Fall of the Dollar 2011 Oxford Oxford University Press
Helleiner Eric States and the Reemergence of Global Finance: From Bretton Woods to the 1990s 1996 Ithaca Cornell University Press
Marx Karl Capital 1974 [1894] Volume 3 London Lawrence & Wishart
Norfield Tony ‘The Economics of British Imperialism’ Economics of Imperialism 2011 May 22 available at: <http://economicsofimperialism.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/economics-of-british-imperialism.html>
Norfield Tony ‘Derivatives and Capitalist Markets: The Speculative Heart of Capital’ Historical Materialism 2012a 20 1 103 132
Norfield Tony ‘The City of London: Parasite of the World Economy’ Economics of Imperialism 2012b October 3 available at: <http://economicsofimperialism.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/the-city-of-london-parasite-of-world.html>
Norfield Tony ‘Value Theory and Finance’ Research in Political Economy 2013 28 161 195
ONS The Pink Book 2012 July available at: <http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/bop/united-kingdom-balance-of-payments/2012/index.html>
Warnock Francis E. & Warnock Veronica C. ‘International Capital Flows and US Interest Rates’ International Finance Discussion Papers 2005 Number 840 Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System September 2005
Norfield 2012a, p. 129.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 98.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 99.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 100.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 104.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, pp. 104–5.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006a, p. 87.
Bryan and Rafferty 2007, p. 153.
BIS 2010a, p. 32. There is yet another currency-related ‘derivative’ along these lines called a ‘currency swap’, in which, among other things, it is usually agreed to exchange principal amounts in different currencies at a pre-agreed exchange rate at maturity. The currency swaps market is only around 6–7% of the size of the single-interest-rate swap market, however, and I will not discuss it here.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 103.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b, p. 12.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b, p. 5.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 104.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 100.
They refer to Chen, Filardo, He and Zhu 2011, after stating that ‘the world’s leading central banks now have massive holdings of a range of securities and derivatives on their books, all in the name of managing market liquidity and securing forms of monetary stability’ (Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 102). However, Chen et al. do not refer to central banks buying derivatives, but buying bond-type securities (Chen, Filardo, He and Zhu 2011, p. 235). One might argue that the Federal Reserve’s ‘Maiden Lane’ assets, resulting from the demise of Bear Stearns and AIG, are ‘derivatives’, but they are also made up from mortgages, loans and various MBS and CDOs.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b, p. 106.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b, pp. 131–2.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b, p. 153.
Marx 1974, Chapter 24, p. 397.
Bryan and Rafferty 2006b, p. 136.
BIS 2010a, Table B4, p. 12.
ONS 2012, Table 3.6.
Bryan and Rafferty 2012, p. 107.
See Warnock and Warnock 2005.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 663 | 109 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 203 | 15 | 12 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 148 | 36 | 27 |
This paper contributes to the debate on the role of financial derivatives for capitalism. It responds to Bryan and Rafferty’s defence of their analysis and their critique of my own. The paper argues that their analysis confuses what a financial derivative does, and mixes together different kinds of derivative – and non-derivative – that play very different roles. After detailing these points, the paper discusses the relationship between gold, money and derivatives, rejecting their notion that derivatives are some kind of new ‘commodity money’. An important theme absent from Bryan and Rafferty’s analysis is the relationship of financial trading and derivatives markets to parasitism in the imperialist world economy. To illustrate this, the paper notes advantages enjoyed by the major financial powers – the US and the UK – that are the main centres for the origination of derivatives and for derivatives trading.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 663 | 109 | 11 |
Full Text Views | 203 | 15 | 12 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 148 | 36 | 27 |