In this paper, I outline what I take to be the most important theoretical claims and innovations of ‘twenty-first century socialism’ in Venezuela. These, I argue, consist of an emphasis on human development through popular-economy initiatives, and the importance of building popular power through the state, rather than by ignoring or fighting against it. I then present evidence on Venezuela’s Socialist Production Units, one of Venezuela’s newest state-supported popular-economy organisations. I argue that, consistent with the twenty-first-century socialism approach, SPUs are sites of human development in which participants are learning to challenge capitalist social relations, while establishing new values and practices. Therefore, we can think of Venezuela’s popular economy as expressing a sharpened class contradiction.
However, my case study also shows that holding hands with human development is class struggle directed against the state. This reveals a central theoretical and practical paradox in twenty-first century socialism, namely that, while nurturing initiatives that challenge capital, the Venezuelan state also emerges as an important barrier to overcoming the class relation. This, I argue, is not wholly consistent with the views of theorists of twenty-first century socialism that understand Venezuela’s popular economy as forming a new form of dual power or a parallel state, and who therefore downplay the importance of struggles against the state within the popular economy. The strategic implication is that struggles between popular-economy participants and the state cannot be avoided, and indeed will need to be fostered if the project for twenty-first century socialism is to continue.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Albert Michael ‘Which Way Venezuela?’ 2008 accessed 7 October 2013 available at: <http://www.zcommunications.org/which-way-venezuela-by-michael-albert.html>
Álvarez Víctor & Rodriguez Davgla ‘Guía teórico-práctica para la creación de EPS’ Banco Industrial de Venezuela 2007
Azzellini Dario Azzellini Dario & Ness Immanuel ‘Workers’ Control under Venezuela’s Bolivarian Revolution’ Ours to Master and to Own 2011 Chicago Haymarket Press
Bárcena Alicia ‘Spreading the Wealth’ Finance and Development 2011 accessed 7 October 2013 48 1 20 22 available at: <http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2011/03/barcena.htm>
Braverman Harry Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century 1974 New York Monthly Review Press
Bruce Iain The Real Venezuela: Making Socialism in the 21st Century 2008 London Pluto Press
Burawoy Michael The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism 1985 London Routledge
Castañeda Jorge G. ‘Latin America’s Left Turn’ Foreign Affairs 2006 85 3 28 43
Chávez Hugo ‘Propuesta del Candidato de la Patria Comandante Hugo Chávez para la Gestión Bolivariana Socialista 2013–2019’ 2012 accessed 7 October 2013 available at: <http://blog.chavez.org.ve/programa-patria-venezuela-2013-2019/#.UMYuG3y9KK0>
Ciccariello-Maher George ‘Dual Power in the Venezuelan Revolution’ Monthly Review 2007 59 4 42 56
Díaz Benito ‘Políticas públicas para la promoción de cooperativas en Venezuela (1999–2006)’ Revista Venezolana de Economía Social 2006 6 1 149 183
Eastwood Jonathan Ponniah & Eastwood ‘The Revolution in Venezuela’ 2011 2011
Ellner Steve ‘The Perennial Debate over Socialist Goals Played Out in Venezuela’ Science and Society 2010 74 1 63 84
El Militante ‘Entrevista A Los Trabajadores Despedidos De Invepal Maracay’ 2006 accessed 15 October 2013 available at: <http://www.elmilitantevenezuela.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5278:entrevista-a-los-trabajadores-despedidos-de-invepal-maracay&catid=107:lucha-obrera&Itemid=166>
Freire Paulo Ramos Myra Bergman Pedagogy of the Oppressed 1970 New York Continuum
Graterol Yetzenia & Díaz Benito ‘Situación económica y balance social de las cooperativas que participan en la gestión del servicio público de agua potable en el Estado Trujillo, Venezuela’ Cayapa. Revista Venezolana de Economía Social 2007 7 13 30 58
Greanville Post ‘Venezuela’s Minimum Wage to Rise 32.25% in 2012’ 2012 April 11 accessed 12 July 2012 available at: <http://www.greanvillepost.com/2012/04/11/venezuelas-minimum-wage-to-rise-32-25-in-2012/>
Harnecker Camila Piñeiro ‘Workplace Democracy and Collective Consciousness: An Empirical Study of Venezuelan Cooperatives’ Monthly Review 2007 59 6 27 40
Harnecker Marta ‘Latin America and Twenty-First Century Socialism: Inventing to Avoid Mistakes’ Monthly Review 2010 62 3 1 83
Lebowitz Michael A. Beyond Capital: Marx’s Political Economy of the Working Class 2003 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
Lebowitz Michael A. ‘Holloway’s Scream: Full of Sound and Fury’ Historical Materialism 2005 13 4 217 231
Lebowitz Michael A. Build It Now: Socialism for the Twenty-First Century 2006 New York Monthly Review Press
Lebowitz Michael A. ‘Venezuela a Good Example of the Bad Left of Latin America’ Monthly Review 2007 59 3 38 54
Lebowitz Michael A. ‘Socialism: The Goal, the Paths and the Compass’ The Bullet 2010 accessed 21 February 2010 available at: <http://www.socialistproject.ca/bullet/315.php>
Llerena Mónica ‘Empresas sociales y política de competencia. Working Paper’ 2006 accessed 1 May 2009 available at: <http://www.redeconomia.org>
Lucena Héctor & Carmona Hermes ‘Empresas recuperadas: Posibilidades y limitaciones a partir de la experiencia con INVEPAL’ 2006 accessed 7 October 2013 available at: <http://svs.osu.edu/documents/Hector_Lucena_y_HermesCarmona-EMPRESASRECUPERADASCASOINVEPAL.pdf>
Martinez Carlos, Fox Michael & Farrell JoJo Venezuela Speaks!: Voices from the Grassroots 2010 Oakland PM Press
Marx Karl & Engels Friedrich The German Ideology 1970 [1846] New York International Publishers
Motta Sara Nilsen Alf, Motta Sara, Nilsen Alf Gunvald & Nilsen Alf Gunfald ‘Notes Towards Pre-figurative Epistemologies’ Social Movements in the Global South: Dispossession, Development and Resistance 2011 Basingstoke Palgrave Macmillan
PDVSA ‘Anexo 12. Guía General Corporativa para la implantación Programa EPS en PDVSA’ 2006 accessed 21 July 2010 available at: <http://200.5.41.139/reps/doc/Ficha_Descriptiva_Programa_EPS.doc>
Ponniah Thomas & Eastwood Jonathan The Revolution in Venezuela 2011 Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press
Poulantzas Nicos Camiller Patrick State, Power, Socialism 1978 London Verso
Schugurensky Daniel Bekerman Zvi, Burbules Nicholas C. & Silberman Keller Diana ‘This Is Our School of Citizenship: Informal Learning in Local Democracy’ Learning in Hidden Places: The Informal Education Reader 2006 New York Peter Lang
Schugurensky Daniel & Lerner Josh van der Veen Ruud, Wildemeersch Danny, Youngblood Janet & Marsick Victoria ‘Who Learns What in Participatory Democracy? Participatory Budgeting in Rosario, Argentina’ Democratic Practices as Learning Opportunities 2007 Rotterdam Sense Publishers
Schugurensky Daniel & Pinnington Elizabeth Daly Katherine, Schugurensky Daniel & Lopes Krista ‘Civic Learning and Political Engagement through Participatory Budgeting: The Case of Guelph, Canada’ Learning Democracy by Doing: Alternative Practices in Citizenship, Learning and Participatory Democracy 2009 Toronto Transformative Learning Centre, University of Toronto
Vieta Marcelo & Ruggeri Andrés McMurtry J.J. & Reed Darryl ‘The Worker-Recuperated Enterprises as Workers’ Cooperatives: The Conjunctures, Challenges, and Innovations of Self-Management in Argentina and Latin America’ Co-operatives in a Global Economy: The Challenges of Co-operation across Borders 2009 Newcastle Cambridge Scholars Publishing
Weisbrot Mark Ponniah & Eastwood ‘Venezuela in the Chávez Years: Its Economy and Influence on the Region’ 2011 2011
Wilpert Gregory Changing Venezuela by Taking Power: The History and Policies of the Chávez Government 2007 London Verso
Castañeda 2006.
Lebowitz 2007.
Bárcena 2011.
Eastwood 2011, p. 6.
Weisbrot 2011, pp. 204–5.
Lebowitz 2010.
Marx and Engels 1970, p. 64.
Álvarez and Rodriguez, p. 19.
Wilpert 2007.
Harnecker 2010, p. 62.
Cf. Poulantzas 1978.
Lebowitz 2005, p. 228.
Ciccariello-Maher 2007.
Ellner 2010.
Harnecker 2010, p. 62.
Martinez, Fox and Farrell (eds.) 2010, pp. 7–8.
Martinez, Fox and Farrell (eds.) 2010, p. viii.
Bruce 2008, p. 138.
Cf. Harnecker 2007.
Graterol and Díaz 2007.
Harnecker 2007. I was not able to find reliable up-to-date figures.
Lucena and Carmona 2006.
Vieta and Ruggeri 2009, p. 30.
Lucena and Carmona 2006; El Militante 2006.
Harnecker 2007.
Chávez 2012.
Albert 2008; Azzellini 2011.
PDVSA 2006.
Freire 1970; Motta 2011.
Lebowitz 2003, 2005, 2006.
Lebowitz 2010, p. 62.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 770 | 100 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 226 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 126 | 8 | 0 |
In this paper, I outline what I take to be the most important theoretical claims and innovations of ‘twenty-first century socialism’ in Venezuela. These, I argue, consist of an emphasis on human development through popular-economy initiatives, and the importance of building popular power through the state, rather than by ignoring or fighting against it. I then present evidence on Venezuela’s Socialist Production Units, one of Venezuela’s newest state-supported popular-economy organisations. I argue that, consistent with the twenty-first-century socialism approach, SPUs are sites of human development in which participants are learning to challenge capitalist social relations, while establishing new values and practices. Therefore, we can think of Venezuela’s popular economy as expressing a sharpened class contradiction.
However, my case study also shows that holding hands with human development is class struggle directed against the state. This reveals a central theoretical and practical paradox in twenty-first century socialism, namely that, while nurturing initiatives that challenge capital, the Venezuelan state also emerges as an important barrier to overcoming the class relation. This, I argue, is not wholly consistent with the views of theorists of twenty-first century socialism that understand Venezuela’s popular economy as forming a new form of dual power or a parallel state, and who therefore downplay the importance of struggles against the state within the popular economy. The strategic implication is that struggles between popular-economy participants and the state cannot be avoided, and indeed will need to be fostered if the project for twenty-first century socialism is to continue.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 770 | 100 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 226 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 126 | 8 | 0 |