Do you want to stay informed about this journal? Click the buttons to subscribe to our alerts.
After highlighting the philological and theoretical fortes of Peter Thomas’s The Gramscian Moment, the intervention questions his assumption of Gramsci’s allegedly ‘neutral’ concept of ideology. This interpretation is one-sided in that it leaves out the ideology-critique adopted via Labriola and practised throughout Gramsci’s work. Gramsci’s perspective of rendering people’s common sense more coherent opens up a more democratic perspective than Kautsky’s and Lenin’s notion that socialist class-consciousness is to be brought ‘from without’. The intervention argues that the reconstruction of a ‘Luxemburg-Gramsci line’ is of importance for today’s debates and struggles.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adolphi Wolphram ‘ “Die Linie Luxemburg-Gramsci” und linke Theorie und Praxis heute. XI. Internationale Tagung des InkriT vom 7. bis 10. Juni 2007’ Utopie Kreativ 2008 209 234 41
Althusser Louis & Balibar Étienne Brewster Ben Reading ‘Capital’ 2009 London Verso
Argument-Redaktion Die Linie Luxemburg-Gramsci. Zur Aktualität und Historizität marxistischen Denkens 1989 Berlin/Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Brie Michael Radikale Realpolitik. Plädoyer für eine andere Republik 2009 Berlin Karl Dietz Verlag
Elliot Gregory Althusser: The Detour of Theory, Historical Materialism 2009 Book Series, Chicago Haymarket Books
Frosini Fabio Gramsci e la filosofia. Saggio sui ‘Quaderni del Carcere’ 2003 Rome Carocci
Gramsci Antonio Hoare Quintin & Nowell-Smith Geoffrey Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci 1971 New York International Publishers
Gramsci Antonio Gerratana Valentino Quaderni del carcere 1975 Turin Einaudi
Gramsci Antonio Bochmann Klaus , Haug W.F. & Jehle Peter Gefängnishefte. Kritische Gesamtausgabe 1991–2002a Volume 1 Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Gramsci Antonio Bochmann Klaus , Haug W.F. & Jehle Peter Gefängnishefte. Kritische Gesamtausgabe 1991–2002b Volume 6 Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Gramsci Antonio Boothman Derek Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks 1995 London Lawrence and Wishart
Hall Stuart Nelson Cary & Grossberg Lawrence ‘The Toad in the Garden: Thatcherism among the Theorists’, in Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture 1988 Chicago University of Illinois Press
Haug Frigga Rosa Luxemburg und die Kunst der Politik 2007 Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Haug Wolfgang Fritz Elemente einer Theorie des Ideologischen 1993 Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Haug Wolfgang Fritz ‘Introduction’, in Gramsci 1991–2002b 1994
Haug Wolfgang Fritz ‘ “Historisch-kritisch” (“Historico-critique”)’, in Historisch Kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus 2004 Volume 6/I Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Haug Wolfgang Fritz ‘Historical-Critical Dictionary of Marxism: “Historical-Critical” ’ Historical Materialism 2006 14 2 259 70
Hudis Peter & Anderson Kevin B. The Rosa Luxemburg Reader 2004 New York Monthly Review Press
Kautsky Karl ‘Die Revision des Programms der Sozialdemokratie in Oesterreich’ Neue Zeit 1901 20 1 68 82
Labriola Antonio Gerratana Valentino & Guerra Augusto Saggi sul materialismo storico 1964 [1896] Rome Editori Riuniti
Labriola Antonio Kerr Charles H. Essays on the Materialist Conception of History 1966 [1896] New York Monthly Review Press
Labriola Antonio Sbarberi Franco Discorrendo di socialismo e di filosofia, in Scritti filosofici e politici 1973 [1897] Turin Einaudi
Lenin Vladimir Ilyich Collected Works 1960–70a Volume 1 Moscow Progress Publishers
Lenin Vladimir Ilyich Collected Works 1960–70b Volume 5 Moscow Progress Publishers
Lenin Vladimir Ilyich Collected Works 1960–70c Volume 36 Moscow Progress Publishers
Lih Lars T. Lenin Rediscovered: ‘What Is to Be Done?’ in Context, Historical Materialism 2005 Book Series, Chicago Haymarket Books
Luxemburg Rosa Gesammelte Werke 1970–5a Volume 1/I Berlin/GDR Karl Dietz Verlag edited by the Institute for Marxism-Leninism at the cc of the sed
Luxemburg Rosa Gesammelte Werke 1970–5b Volume 1/II Berlin/GDR Karl Dietz Verlag edited by the Institute for Marxism-Leninism at the cc of the sed
Luxemburg Rosa Gesammelte Werke 1970–5c Volume 4 Berlin/GDR Karl Dietz Verlag edited by the Institute for Marxism-Leninism at the cc of the sed
Marx Karl Fowkes Ben Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. 1976 Volume One Harmondsworth Penguin Books
Marx Karl & Engels Friedrich Marx/Engels Collected Works 1975–2005a Volume 3 London Lawrence and Wishart
Marx Karl & Engels Friedrich Marx/Engels Collected Works 1975–2005b Volume 5 London Lawrence and Wishart
Marx Karl & Engels Friedrich Marx/Engels Collected Works 1975–2005c Volume 6 London Lawrence and Wishart
Marx Karl & Engels Friedrich Marx/Engels Collected Works 1975–2005d Volume 26 London Lawrence and Wishart
Marx Karl & Engels Friedrich Marx/Engels Collected Works 1975–2005e Volume 35 London Lawrence and Wishart
Projekt Ideologietheorie Theorien über Ideologie 1979 Berlin Argument-Verlag
Projekt Ideologietheorie Faschismus und Ideologie 1 1980 Berlin Argument-Verlag
Projekt Ideologietheorie Weber Klaus Faschismus und Ideologie 2007 Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Rehmann Jan ‘Ideology Theory’ Historical Materialism 2007 15 4 211 39
Rehmann Jan Theories of Ideology: The Powers of Alienation and Subjection, Historical Materialism 2013 Book Series, Leiden Brill
Röttger Bernd Die ‘Linie Luxemburg-Gramsci’: Perspektiven kritischer Gewerkschaftsforschung 2008 Hamburg Argument-Verlag
Thomas Peter D. The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism, Historical Materialism 2009 Book Series, Leiden Brill
Weiss Peter Notizbücher 1971–1980 1981 Volume 1 Frankfurt Suhrkamp Verlag
Thomas 2009, p. 271.
Thomas 2009, pp. XIX, 39.
Haug 1994, p. 1199.
Frosini 2003, p. 16.
Thomas 2009, pp. 106, 108.
Marx and Engels 1975–2005b, p. 3.
Thomas 2009, pp. 386 et sqq.
Althusser and Balibar 2009, p. 155.
Marx and Engels 1975–2005b, p. 3.
Thomas 2009, p. 394. Cf. Q11, §12.
Thomas 2009, pp. 397–8.
Thomas 2009, p. 449.
Cf. the critique in Rehmann 2013, pp. 155–60, 173–8.
Thomas 2009, p. 101, n. 46; p. 225, n. 62.
Cf. Thomas 2009, pp. 246 et sqq.
Marx and Engels 1975–2005a, pp. 91, 142.
Cf. Haug 2006, pp. 264–5. It would be a rewarding task to show that Marx’s method of historical-critical reconstruction and Gramsci’s philological critique have the potential to encompass Derrida’s deconstruction as well as to transcend and ‘sublate’ it.
Thomas 2009, p. 249.
Thomas 2009, p. 253.
Thomas 2009, p. 281; emphasis mine, JR.
Thomas 2009, pp. 277–8, 291–2, 298, 377.
Cf. Q10.I, §10 (Gramsci 1995, pp. 351–4) and Q10.II, §31i (Gramsci 1995, pp. 383–9).
Q 10.II, §41xii; cf. Gramsci 1995, pp. 395–6.
Cf. Marx and Engels 1975–2005e, pp. 87, 542; Marx 1976, pp. 169, 682.
Marx and Engels 1975–2005c, p. 506.
Cf. Labriola 1966, pp. 98, 123; Labriola 1964, pp. 77, 91. In regard to ‘critical communism’ versus premature ‘ideologies of communism’, cf. Labriola 1966, pp. 73–4; Labriola 1964, pp. 52–3.
Cf. Labriola 1966, pp. 126–7; Labriola 1964, p. 93.
For example, Thomas 2009, pp. 21–2, 250, 260–1, 342–43.
Q10.II, §24, 1263.
Q11, §12, 1378; Gramsci 1971, p. 326.
Gramsci 1971, pp. 330–1.
Cf. Hall 1988, p. 56, as well as Projekt Ideologietheorie 1980, p. 37 (Projekt Ideologietheorie 2007, pp. 57–8).
Luxemburg 1970–5a, p. 373.
Haug 2007, p. 82.
Haug 2007, pp. 84, 171 et sqq.
Haug 2007, p. 180.
Weiss 1981, p. 608.
Thomas 2009, p. 198.
Thomas 2009, p. 213.
Thomas 2009, p. 235; cf. Q13, §18.
Lenin 1960–70a, p. 151.
Gramsci 1971, pp. 441, 445; Q11, §17, 1412, 1415; cf. §37, 1455 et sqq.
Lenin 1960–70b, p. 375; cf. p. 422.
Cf. Lih 2005, pp. 637, 645–6, 655–6.
Lenin 1960–70c, p. 605.
Gramsci 1971, p. 189; cf. Q13, §36.
For example, Thomas 2009, pp. 6, 9, 108, 292.
Althusser and Balibar 2009, pp. 149–50, 153–4.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 588 | 90 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 66 | 16 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 113 | 30 | 2 |
After highlighting the philological and theoretical fortes of Peter Thomas’s The Gramscian Moment, the intervention questions his assumption of Gramsci’s allegedly ‘neutral’ concept of ideology. This interpretation is one-sided in that it leaves out the ideology-critique adopted via Labriola and practised throughout Gramsci’s work. Gramsci’s perspective of rendering people’s common sense more coherent opens up a more democratic perspective than Kautsky’s and Lenin’s notion that socialist class-consciousness is to be brought ‘from without’. The intervention argues that the reconstruction of a ‘Luxemburg-Gramsci line’ is of importance for today’s debates and struggles.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 588 | 90 | 1 |
Full Text Views | 66 | 16 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 113 | 30 | 2 |