The Governance of Economies and the Economics of Governance

in Historical Materialism
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Nearly all fractions within the political, economic, and social spheres gave responses to the recent financial crisis. In broad terms, both left-leaning and right-leaning scholars and commentators presented their explanations for the crisis, with confident agendas defining ‘what is wrong’ and how to deal with it. However, as intellectual history shows us, most of those explanations were no less fascinating precisely because they shared more that they acknowledged. A major divide has been over the role of governments in coordinating markets, or, in the case of Roberts’s The Logic of Discipline, the role of markets in coordinating governments. In this essay, I offer an overview of Alasdair Roberts’s arguments in The Logic of Discipline. Gradually, I extend the examined issues beyond the state-market dichotomy, arguing that only in understanding the interactive force of the two can a systemic analysis of capitalism hope to be plausible.

Historical Materialism

Research in Critical Marxist Theory

Sections

References

CrottyJames ‘Profound Structural Flaws in the us Financial System that Helped Cause the Current Global Financial Crisis’ Economic and Political Weekly 2009 13 44 127 135

CrottyJamesEpsteinGerald ‘Proposals for Effectively Regulating the us Financial System to Avoid Yet Another Meltdown’ Economics Department Working Paper Series 2008 Working Paper Number 2008–15 available at: <http://scholarworks.umass.edu/econ_workingpaper/17>.

FergusonThomasRogersJoel Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics 1986 New York Hill and Wang

FligsteinNeil The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies 2001 Princeton Princeton University Press

HarveyDavid ‘In What Ways Is “The New Imperialism” Really New?’ Historical Materialism 2007 3 15 57 70

HarveyDavid ‘Is this Really the End of Neoliberalism?’ Counterpunch 2009 March 13–15 available at: <http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/03/13/is-this-really-the-end-of-neoliberalism/>.

JessopBob The Future of the Capitalist State 2002 Cambridge Polity Press

LebaronFrédéric ‘Nobel Economists as Public Intellectuals: The Circulation of Symbolic Capital’ International Journal of Contemporary Sociology 2006 1 41 87 104

LebaronFrédéric ‘Central Bankers in the Contemporary Global Field of Power: a “Social Space” Approach’ The Sociological Review 2008 1 56 121 144

SmithRaymond D. ‘The Role of Greed in the Ongoing Global Financial Crisis’ Journal of Human Values 2010 2 16 187 194

SormanGuy Economics Does Not Lie: A Defense of the Free Market in a Time of Crisis 2009 New York Encounter Books

WilliamsonKevin D. ‘Pop Economics – Greed Did Not Cause the Financial Crisis; Bad Investments Did’ National Review 2009 19 61 16

WrayL. RandallTymoigneÉric ‘Macroeconomics Meets Hyman P. Minsky: The Financial Theory of Investment’ The Levy Economics Institute and University of Missouri – Kansas City 2008 Working Paper No. 543.

1

Smith 2010, p. 193.

2

Williamson 2009; Sorman 2009.

4

Ferguson and Rogers 1986, p. 7.

5

Harvey 2009.

6

Jessop 2002.

7

See for instance Harvey 2007.

8

Fligstein 2001.

9

Lebaron 2006, 2008. See also Fligstein 2001 for more on change and stability in market forms.

10

See for instance Wray and Tymoigne 2008.

11

Ferguson and Rogers 1986, pp. 46–7.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 4
Full Text Views 1 1 1
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0