Through an historical analysis of the transnational practices of economists during the Cold War, Johanna Bockman rejects the narrative that the revolutions of 1989 represented the victory of ‘Western economics’, and especially neoliberalism, over ‘East-European socialism’. Rather, Bockman shows that the space of exchange, as well as policy experimentation in socialist states such as Yugoslavia and Hungary, led to the articulation of alternative, decentralised, ‘market socialisms’ from the 1950s up until the 1980s. Instead of operating within separate and incommensurable paradigms of ‘capitalist’ and ‘socialist’ economics, Bockman shows how neoclassical theory and its long tradition of comparing distinct economic systems became the central episteme allowing for the transnational exchange of ideas between economists of both the East and the West. This review-essay evaluates the book’s central claims but argues that the book stands on weaker ground when arguing that a reformed socialism was a viable option in Eastern Europe after 1989.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Åslund Anders How Capitalism was Built: The Transformation of Central and Eastern Europe, Russia, the Caucasus, and Central Asia 2007 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Bohle Dorothee & Greskovits Béla Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery 2012 Ithaca Cornell University Press
Centeno Miguel A. & Silva Patricio The Politics of Expertise in Latin America 1998 New York St Martin’s Press
Crowley Stephen & Stanojevic Miroslav ‘Varieties of Capitalism, Power Resources, and Historical Legacies: Explaining the Slovenian Exception’ Politics & Society 2011 39 2 268 295
Fourcade Marion Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s 2006 Princeton Princeton University Press
Harvey David A Brief History of Neoliberalism 2005 Oxford Oxford University Press
King Lawrence P. & Sznajder Aleksandra ‘The State-Led Transition to Liberal Capitalism: Neoliberal, Organizational, World-Systems, and Social Structural Explanations of Poland’s Economic Success’ American Journal of Sociology 2006 112 3 751 801
Lavigne Marie International Political Economy and Socialism 1991 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
Mitchell Timothy Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity 2002 Berkeley University of California Press
Ong Aihwa Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty 2006 Durham, NC Duke University Press
Polanyi Karl The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Time 2001 [1944] Boston Beacon Press
Rose Nikolas & Miller Peter ‘Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government’ British Journal of Sociology 1992 43 2 173 205
Sachs Jeffrey D. Poland’s Jump to the Market Economy 1993 Cambridge, MA The MIT Press
Sachs Jeffrey D. & Woo Wing Thye ‘Experiences in the Transition to a Market Economy’ Journal of Comparative Economics 1994 18 3 271 275
Schumpeter Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy 1950 New York Harper & Row Publishers
Sachs 1993; Sachs and Woo 1994.
Åslund 2007.
Harvey 2005.
Fourcade 2006.
Lavigne 1991.
Schumpeter 1950, p. 172.
Polanyi 2001.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 380 | 77 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 258 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 90 | 17 | 0 |
Through an historical analysis of the transnational practices of economists during the Cold War, Johanna Bockman rejects the narrative that the revolutions of 1989 represented the victory of ‘Western economics’, and especially neoliberalism, over ‘East-European socialism’. Rather, Bockman shows that the space of exchange, as well as policy experimentation in socialist states such as Yugoslavia and Hungary, led to the articulation of alternative, decentralised, ‘market socialisms’ from the 1950s up until the 1980s. Instead of operating within separate and incommensurable paradigms of ‘capitalist’ and ‘socialist’ economics, Bockman shows how neoclassical theory and its long tradition of comparing distinct economic systems became the central episteme allowing for the transnational exchange of ideas between economists of both the East and the West. This review-essay evaluates the book’s central claims but argues that the book stands on weaker ground when arguing that a reformed socialism was a viable option in Eastern Europe after 1989.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 380 | 77 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 258 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 90 | 17 | 0 |