Taking Mina Loy’s articulation of femininity in her poem ‘One O’Clock at Night’ as a point of departure, I examine a false dichotomy facing contemporary feminism: should we identify with or reject the gender imposed upon us? In conjunction with a materialist analysis which posits women as a class, this paper argues that Loy’s discussion of gender could provide a useful framework with which to critique the ‘soft abolitionist’ approach trending today; a largely online movement which assumes that the individual can permanently sever themselves from the confines of gender and construct an autonomous political subjectivity from this shared (and often openly traumatised) ‘non-identity’. I discuss criticisms by trans theorists of the notion that liberation can be located from within gender, and explore ways in which the identification- versus-rejection question has been engaged with in historical feminisms. This includes Monique Wittig’s partial rejection of the term ‘woman’, and a strand of 1970s radical feminism termed (by its critics) ‘the anti-woman line’. In its conclusion, this paper looks to the present – using the feminist-activist group Sisters Uncut as a case study. It asks whether a dialectical praxis, looking to the conversations around ‘identity’ had within historical feminist movements, could inject contemporary feminisms and struggles with a politics of solidarity or political subjecthood, cutting through debates based on narrow understandings of identity and non-identity.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ask a Non-Binary, available at: <http://askanonbinary.tumblr.com/>.
Bornstein, Kate 1994, Gender Outlaw: On Men, Women, and the Rest of Us, New York: Routledge.
Bornstein, Kate 1998, My Gender Workbook: How to Become a Real Man, a Real Woman, the Real You, or Something Else Entirely, New York: Routledge.
Butler, Judith 1990, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New York: Routledge.
C.E. 2012, ‘Undoing Sex: Against Sexual Optimism’, Lies: A Journal of Materialist Feminism, 1: 15–43.
Cornish, Megan et al. 2001 [1967], The Radical Women Manifesto: Socialist Feminist Theory, Program and Organizational Structure, Seattle: Red Letter Press.
Echols, Alice 1989, Daring to Be Bad: Radical Feminism in America, 1967–1975, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Endnotes 2013, ‘The Logic of Gender: On the Separation of Spheres and the Process of Abjection’, Endnotes, 3: 56–91, available at: <https://endnotes.org.uk/issues/3/en/endnotes-the-logic-of-gender>.
Facebook Diversity 2015, post from 26 February, available at: <https://www.facebook.com/facebookdiversity/posts/774221582674346>.
Faye, Shon 2017, post from 7 June, available at: <https://www.facebook.com/shonfaye90210/>.
Firestone, Shulamith 2015 [1970], The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, London: Verso.
Gayle, Damien and Ruth McKee 2016, ‘Activists Surround Yarl’s Wood Detention Centre with Wall of Noise’, The Guardian, 10 September, available at: <https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/sep/10/activists-demand-closure-yarls-wood-surround-centre-wall-noise>.
Grant, Judith 2005, ‘Gender and Marx’s Radical Humanism in The Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844’, Rethinking Marxism: A Review of Economics, Culture and Society, 17, 1: 59–77.
Loy, Mina 1997, The Lost Lunar Baedeker: Poems of Mina Loy, edited by Roger L. Conover, Manchester: Carcanet.
Nelson, Maggie 2016, The Argonauts, London: Melville House.
Potts, Morgan 2016, ‘Gender Discourse: An Open Letter to Sisters Uncut’, 2 July, available at: <http://morganpotts.com/2016/gender-discourse-an-open-letter-to-sisters-uncut/>.
Raymond, Janice G. 2006, ‘Sappho by Surgery: The Transexually Constructed Lesbian-Feminist’, in Stryker and Whittle (eds.) 2006.
Roberts, Amber 2016, ‘We Talked to the Growing Online Community of “Otherkin”: People who Identify as Non-Human’, Vice, 16 July, available at: <https://www.vice.com/en_uk/article/mvxgwa/from-dragons-to-foxes-the-otherkin-community-believes-you-can-be-whatever-you-want-to-be>.
Rose, Jacqueline 2016, ‘Who Do You Think You Are?’, London Review of Books, 38, 9: 3–13, available at: <www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n09/jacqueline-rose/who-do-you-think-you-are>.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1991a [1960], Critique of Dialectical Reason. Volume I: Theory of Practical Ensembles, edited by Jonathan Rée, translated by Alan Sheridan-Smith, London: Verso.
Sartre, Jean-Paul 1991b [1985], Critique of Dialectical Reason. Volume II: The Intelligibility of History, edited by Arlette Elkaim-Sartre, translated by Quintin Hoare, London: Verso.
Sisters Uncut 2016, ‘Sisters Uncut: Safer Spaces Policy’, 20 November, available at: <http://www.sistersuncut.org/saferspaces/>.
Somerset House 2017, ‘Trans* Manifestos: Thinking against Essentialised Binaries’, Gender, Sexuality and Violence Research Network seminar, 26 April, <https://chasegsv.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/trans-manifestos-thinking-against-essentialised-binaries/>.
Spott, Verity 2015, Trans* Manifestos, Cambridge: Shit Valley Press.
Spott, Verity 2017, ‘Pronoun Manifesto’, 5 April, available at: <https://twotornhalves.blogspot.co.uk/2017/04/pronoun-manifesto.html>.
Stone, Sandy 2006, ‘The Empire Strikes Back: A Posttransexual Manifesto’, in Stryker and Whittle (eds.) 2006.
Stryker, Susan and Stephen Whittle (eds.) 2006, The Transgender Studies Reader, New York: Routledge.
Whittle, Stephen 2006, ‘Foreword’, in Stryker and Whittle (eds.) 2006.
Wittig, Monique 1992a [1981], ‘One Is Not Born a Woman’, in Wittig 1992c.
Wittig, Monique 1992b [1982], ‘The Category of Sex’, in Wittig 1992c.
Wittig, Monique 1992c, The Straight Mind and Other Essays, Boston: Beacon Press.
Yay Pronouns!, available at: <http://yaypronouns.tumblr.com/>.
Young, Iris Marion 1994, ‘Gender as Seriality: Thinking about Women as a Social Collective’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19, 3: 713–738.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 687 | 84 | 9 |
Full Text Views | 256 | 11 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 244 | 36 | 9 |
Taking Mina Loy’s articulation of femininity in her poem ‘One O’Clock at Night’ as a point of departure, I examine a false dichotomy facing contemporary feminism: should we identify with or reject the gender imposed upon us? In conjunction with a materialist analysis which posits women as a class, this paper argues that Loy’s discussion of gender could provide a useful framework with which to critique the ‘soft abolitionist’ approach trending today; a largely online movement which assumes that the individual can permanently sever themselves from the confines of gender and construct an autonomous political subjectivity from this shared (and often openly traumatised) ‘non-identity’. I discuss criticisms by trans theorists of the notion that liberation can be located from within gender, and explore ways in which the identification- versus-rejection question has been engaged with in historical feminisms. This includes Monique Wittig’s partial rejection of the term ‘woman’, and a strand of 1970s radical feminism termed (by its critics) ‘the anti-woman line’. In its conclusion, this paper looks to the present – using the feminist-activist group Sisters Uncut as a case study. It asks whether a dialectical praxis, looking to the conversations around ‘identity’ had within historical feminist movements, could inject contemporary feminisms and struggles with a politics of solidarity or political subjecthood, cutting through debates based on narrow understandings of identity and non-identity.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 687 | 84 | 9 |
Full Text Views | 256 | 11 | 3 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 244 | 36 | 9 |