Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Ashley Bohrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in conceptualising the relationship between oppression and capitalism as well as intense debate over the precise nature of this relationship. No doubt spurred on by the financial crisis, it has become increasingly clear that capitalism, both historically and in the twenty-first century, has had particularly devastating effects for women and people of colour. Intersectionality, which emerged in the late twentieth century as a way of addressing the relationship between race, gender, sexuality and class, has submitted orthodox Marxism to critique for its inattention to the complex dynamics of various social locations; in turn Marxist thinkers in the twenty-first century have engaged with intersectionality, calling attention to the impoverished notion of class and capitalism on which it relies. As intersectionality constitutes perhaps the most common way that contemporary activists and theorists on the left conceive of identity politics, an analysis of intersectionality’s relationship to Marxism is absolutely crucial for historical materialists to understand and consider. This paper looks at the history of intersectionality’s and Marxism’s critiques of one another in order to ground a synthesis of the two frameworks. It argues that in the twenty-first century, we need a robust, Marxist analysis of capitalism, and that the only robust account of capitalism is one articulated intersectionally, one which treats class, race, gender and sexuality as fundamental to capitalist accumulation.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aguilar, Delia 2012, ‘From Triple Jeopardy to Intersectionality: A Feminist Perplex’, Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, 32, 2: 415–428.
-
Alcoff, Linda Martín 2011, ‘An Epistemology for the Next Revolution’, Transmodernity: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1, 2: 67–78.
-
Alexander-Floyd, Nikol G. 2012, ‘Disappearing Acts: Reclaiming Intersectionality in the Social Sciences in a Post-Black Feminist Era’, Feminist Formations, 24, 1: 1–25.
-
Allen, Theodore W. 2012, The Invention of the White Race, two volumes, London: Verso.
-
Anderson, Kevin B. 2010, Marx at the Margins: On Nationalism, Ethnicity, and Non-Western Societies, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Barnett, Bernice McNair, Rose M. Brewer and M. Bahati Kuumba 1999, ‘New Directions in Race, Gender & Class Studies: African American Experiences’, Race, Gender & Class, 6, 2, 7–28.
-
Barrett, Michèle 1988 [1980], Women’s Oppression Today: The Marxist/Feminist Encounter, London: Verso.
-
Belkhir, Jean 1993, ‘Editor’s Introduction: Integrating Race, Sex, & Class in Our Disciplines’, Race, Sex & Class, 1, 1: 3–11.
-
Belkhir, Jean 1994, ‘The “Failure” and Revival of Marxism on Race, Gender, & Class Issues’, Race, Sex & Class, 2, 1: 79–107.
-
Belkhir, Jean Ait 2001, ‘Marxism Without Apologies: Integrating Race, Gender, Class; A Working Class Approach’, Race, Gender & Class, 8, 2: 142–171, <https://www.jstor.org/stable/41674975>.
-
Benn Michaels, Walter 2006, The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality, New York: Holt Books.
-
Bohrer, Ashley 2015, ‘Fanon and Feminism: The Discourse of Colonization in Italian Feminism’, Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 17, 3: 378–393, <https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2014.996180>.
-
Brown, Heather A. 2012, Marx on Gender and the Family: A Critical Study, Historical Materialism Book Series, Leiden: Brill.
-
Collins, Patricia Hill 1997, ‘On Wes and Fenstermaker’s Doing Difference’, in Men, Women, and Gender: Ongoing Debates, edited by Mary Roth Walsh, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
-
Collins, Patricia Hill 2000, Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, New York: Routledge.
-
Collins, Patricia Hill 2004, ‘Comment on Hekman’s “Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited”: Where’s The Power?’, in The Feminist Standpoint Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies, edited by Sandra Harding, New York: Routledge.
-
Cox, Nicole and Silvia Federici 1976, Counter-planning from the Kitchen. Wages for Housework: A Perspective on Capital and the Left, New York: New York Wages for Housework Committee.
-
Crenshaw, Kimberlé 1995, Critical Race Theory: The Key Writings that Formed the Movement, New York: The New Press.
-
Dalla Costa, Giovanna Franca 2008, The Work of Love: The Role of Unpaid Housework as a Condition of Poverty and Violence at the Dawn of the 21st Century, New York: Autonomedia.
-
Davis, Angela Y. 1981, Women, Race, and Class, New York: Random House.
-
Engels, Friedrich 1942 [1888], The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, in the Light of the Researches of Lewis H. Morgan, New York: International Publishers.
-
Federici, Silvia 2004, Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation, New York: Autonomedia.
-
Fraser, Nancy 2013, Fortunes of Feminism: From State-Managed Capitalism to Neoliberal Crisis, London: Verso.
-
Gedalof, Irene 2013, ‘Sameness and Difference in Government Equality Talk’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36, 1: 117–135.
-
Gimenez, Martha E. 2001, ‘Marxism and Class, Gender and Race: Rethinking the Trilogy’, Race, Gender & Class, 8, 2: 23–33.
-
Hartmann, Heidi 1981, ‘The Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism’, in Sargent (ed.) 1981.
-
hooks, bell 1981, ‘Sexism and the Black Female Slave Experience’, in Ain’t I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism, Boston, MA: South End Press.
-
James, Selma and Mariarosa Dalla Costa 1973, The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community, Bristol: Falling Wall Press.
-
Kandal, Terry R. 1995, The Woman Question in Classical Sociological Theory, Miami: University Press of Florida.
-
King, Deborah K. 1988, ‘Multiple Jeopardy, Multiple Consciousness: The Context of a Black Feminist Ideology’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14, 1: 42–72.
-
Lorde, Audre 1984, Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
-
Losurdo, Domenico 2011, Liberalism: A Counter-History, translated by Gregory Elliott, London: Verso.
-
Lugones, Maria 2003, Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition against Multiple Oppressions, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
-
Lugones, Maria 2007, ‘Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System’, Hypatia, 22, 1: 186–209.
-
Mann, Susan Archer 2012, Doing Feminist Theory: From Modernity to Postmodernity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Mann, Susan Archer 2013, ‘Third Wave Feminism’s Unhappy Marriage of Poststructuralism and Intersectionality Theory’, Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 4: 54–73.
-
Marx, Karl 1967 [1876], Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, edited by Friedrich Engels, New York: International Publishers.
-
Marx, Karl 1993 [1857–1858/1939], Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy (Rough Draft), translated by Martin Nicolaus, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
-
Marx, Karl 1994, Selected Writings, edited by Lawrence H. Simon, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
-
Marx, Karl and Frederick Engels 2004 [1846/1932], The German Ideology. Part One, with Selections from Parts Two and Three and Supplementary Texts, edited by C.J. Arthur, New York: International Publishers.
-
May, Vivian M. 2014, ‘“Speaking into the Void?”: Intersectionality Critiques and Epistemic Backlash’, Hypatia, 29, 1: 94–112.
-
McClintock, Anne 1995, Imperial Leather: Race, Gender, and Sexuality in the Colonial Contest, New York: Routledge.
-
Melamed, Jodi 2011, Represent and Destroy: Rationalizing Violence in the New Racial Capitalism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Mies, Maria 1986, Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour, First Edition, London: Zed Books.
-
Mintz, Sidney Wilfred 1985, Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History, New York: Viking.
-
Mitchell, Eve 2013, ‘I Am a Woman and a Human: A Marxist Feminist Critique of Intersectionality Theory’, Libcom.org, 12 September, available at: <https://libcom.org/library/i-am-woman-human-marxist-feminist-critique-intersectionality-theory-eve-mitchell>, accessed 26 November 2014.
-
Mohanty, Chandra Talpade 1988, ‘Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses’, Feminist Review, 30: 61–88.
-
Morgan, Jennifer L. 2004, Laboring Women: Reproduction and Gender in New World Slavery, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Perelman, Michael 2000, The Invention of Capitalism: Classical Political Economy and the Secret History of Primitive Accumulation, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Quijano, Anibal 2000, ‘Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America’, Nepantla: Views from South, 1, 3: 533–580.
-
Roberts, Dorothy E. 1997, Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty, New York: Pantheon Books.
-
Roediger, David R. and Elizabeth D. Esch 2014, The Production of Difference: Race and the Management of Labor in U.S. History, New York: Oxford University Press.
-
Sargent, Lydia (ed.) 1981, Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism, Boston, MA: South End Press.
-
Smith, Andrea 2005, Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide, Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
-
Smith, Barbara 1998, The Truth That Never Hurts: Writings on Race, Gender, and Freedom, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
-
Smith, Beverly and Barbara Smith 1983, ‘Across the Kitchen Table: A Sister-to-Sister Dialogue’, in This Bridge Called My Back: Writings by Radical Women of Color, edited by Cherrie Moraga and Gloria Anzaldúa, Second Edition, New York: Kitchen Table Press.
-
Spelman, Elizabeth V. 1988, Inessential Woman: Problems of Exclusion in Feminist Thought, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
-
Stanley, Amy Dru 1998, From Bondage to Contract: Wage Labor, Marriage, and the Market in the Age of Slave Emancipation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
The Combahee River Collective 1977, The Combahee River Collective Statement, April, available at: <http://circuitous.org/scraps/combahee.html>.
-
Vogel, Lise 1983, Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Toward a Unitary Theory, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
-
Walby, Sylvia 1988, Gender Segregation at Work, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
-
Weeks, Kathi 2011, The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
-
Williams, Eric Eustace 1994, Capitalism & Slavery, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
-
Young, Iris Marion 1981, ‘Beyond the Unhappy Marriage: A Critique of Dual Systems Theory’, in Sargent (ed.) 1981.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 8555 | 2206 | 566 |
| Full Text Views | 3879 | 625 | 162 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 6899 | 1520 | 417 |
Intersectionality and Marxism: A Critical Historiography
In: Historical MaterialismSearch for other papers by Ashley Bohrer in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
In recent years, there has been renewed interest in conceptualising the relationship between oppression and capitalism as well as intense debate over the precise nature of this relationship. No doubt spurred on by the financial crisis, it has become increasingly clear that capitalism, both historically and in the twenty-first century, has had particularly devastating effects for women and people of colour. Intersectionality, which emerged in the late twentieth century as a way of addressing the relationship between race, gender, sexuality and class, has submitted orthodox Marxism to critique for its inattention to the complex dynamics of various social locations; in turn Marxist thinkers in the twenty-first century have engaged with intersectionality, calling attention to the impoverished notion of class and capitalism on which it relies. As intersectionality constitutes perhaps the most common way that contemporary activists and theorists on the left conceive of identity politics, an analysis of intersectionality’s relationship to Marxism is absolutely crucial for historical materialists to understand and consider. This paper looks at the history of intersectionality’s and Marxism’s critiques of one another in order to ground a synthesis of the two frameworks. It argues that in the twenty-first century, we need a robust, Marxist analysis of capitalism, and that the only robust account of capitalism is one articulated intersectionally, one which treats class, race, gender and sexuality as fundamental to capitalist accumulation.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 8555 | 2206 | 566 |
| Full Text Views | 3879 | 625 | 162 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 6899 | 1520 | 417 |