A Combined Argument: Beyond Wallerstein?

in Historical Materialism
No Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

In How the West Came to Rule, Alexander Anievas and Kerem Nişancıoğlu offer an alternative to both Political Marxism and world-systems analysis (WSA) by going beyond the nation-state as the unit of analysis in the former and the marginalisation of articulation and combination between modes of production in the latter. Their account also gives more room to non-European actors neglected in other interpretations of the rise of the West. However, I argue that their argument is much closer to WSA and that their critique of Wallerstein regarding Eurocentrism, the origins of capitalism and the role of wage labour in the capitalist world-system is problematic. Furthermore, Anievas and Nişancıoğlu do not offer a sufficiently rigorous definition of combination, leading to an overextension of the concept.

A Combined Argument: Beyond Wallerstein?

in Historical Materialism

Sections

References

AllinsonJamie C. and Alexander Anievas 2009‘The Uses and Misuses of Uneven and Combined Development: An Anatomy of a Concept’Cambridge Review of International Affairs221: 4767.

AllinsonJamie C. and Alexander Anievas 2010‘Approaching “The International”: Beyond Political Marxism’ in Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism edited by Alexander AnievasLondon: Routledge.

AnievasAlexander and Kerem Nişancıoğlu 2015How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of CapitalismLondon: Pluto Press.

ArrighiGiovanni 1994The Long Twentieth Century: Money Power and the Origins of Our TimesFirst EditionLondon: Verso.

ArrighiGiovanni 1998‘Capitalism and the Modern World-System: Rethinking the Nondebates of the 1970’s’Review211: 113129.

ArrighiGiovanni 2007Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First CenturyLondon: Verso.

ArrighiGiovanni and Jessica Drangel 1986‘The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semi-peripheral Zone’Review101: 975.

BhambraGurminder K. 2011‘Talking Among Themselves? Weberian and Marxist Historical Sociologies as Dialogues without “Others”’Millennium: Journal of International Studies393: 667681.

BlautJames M. 1993The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric HistoryCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BrennerRobert 1977‘The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism’New Left ReviewI104: 2592.

BuzanBarry and George Lawson 2015The Global Transformation: History Modernity and the Making of International RelationsCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chase-DunnChristopher 1990‘Resistance to Imperialism: Semiperipheral Actors’Review131: 131.

Chase-DunnChristopher and Marilyn Grell-Brisk 2016‘Uneven and Combined Development in the Sociocultural Evolution of World-Systems’ in Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée edited by Alexander Anievas and Kamran MatinLondon: Rowman & Littlefield.

ComninelGeorge 1987Rethinking the French Revolution: Marxism and the Revisionist ChallengeLondon: Verso.

DavidsonNeil 2012How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions?Chicago: Haymarket Books.

Foster-CarterAidan 1978‘The Modes of Production Controversy’New Left ReviewI107: 4777.

FrankAndre Gunder 1998ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian AgeBerkeley: University of California Press.

GoldstoneJack A. 2009Why Europe? The Rise of the West in World History 1500–1850 New York: McGraw-Hill.

GoodyJack 2006The Theft of HistoryCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

HobsonJohn M. 2012The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory 1760–2010Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

LaclauErnesto 1971‘Feudalism and Capitalism in Latin America’New Left ReviewI67: 1938.

PomeranzKenneth 2000The Great Divergence: China Europe and the Making of the Modern World EconomyPrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

SkocpolTheda 1977‘Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique’American Journal of Sociology825: 10751090.

SternSteve J. 1988‘Feudalism, Capitalism and the World-System in the Perspective of Latin America and the Caribbean’American Historical Review944: 829872.

TerlouwC.P. 1993‘The Elusive Semiperiphery: A Critical Examination of the Concept of the Semiperiphery’International Journal of Comparative Sociology341: 87102.

WallersteinImmanuel 1974The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century New York: Academic Press.

WallersteinImmanuel 1988‘Feudalism, Capitalism, and the World-System in the Perspective of Latin America and the Caribbean: Comments on Stern’s Critical Tests’The American Historical Review934: 873885.

WallersteinImmanuel 1991The Capitalist World-Economy: EssaysCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

WallersteinImmanuel 1992‘The West, Capitalism, and the Modern World-System’Review154: 561619.

WallersteinImmanuel 1996Historical Capitalism with Capitalist CivilizationLondon: Verso.

WallersteinImmanuel 2004World-Systems Analysis: An IntroductionDurham, NC: Duke University Press.

WallersteinImmanuel 2011‘Prologue to the 2011 Edition’ in The Modern World System I. Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth CenturyBerkeley: University of California Press.

Warwick Research Collective 2015Combined and Uneven Development: Towards a New Theory of World-LiteratureLiverpool: Liverpool University Press.

ZolbergAristide 1981‘Origins of the Modern World System: A Missing Link’World Politics332: 253281.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 83 83 37
Full Text Views 133 133 56
PDF Downloads 38 38 14
EPUB Downloads 1 1 1